Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 28 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: criminal law amendment act 2013 section 28 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 537 results (1.533 seconds)Suo Moto Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jun-01-2005
Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1385; 2005(4)WLC163
prosecution despite the system being heavily dependent on the victim criminal justice has been concerned with the offender and his interests towards the last quarter of the twentieth century the common law world realized the adverse consequences arising from this inequitable situation upholding decency and dignity of the womanhood the criminal law amendment act 1983 had added sub sections 2 3 in section the court management there has been an emphasis on procedural activism in the instant case the learned judge presiding the fast the society which includes the victim 2 nothing in sub section 1 extends to any printing or publication of the name the administrator union territory of delhi air 1981 sc 746 28 the mallimath committee has also made recommendations as to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Babbu Barkare @ Dalap Singh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-13-2005
Reported in : AIR2005SC2846; 2005CriLJ3117; JT2005(11)SC257; 2005(4)MPHT1; 2005(II)OLR(SC)414; (2005)5SCC413
the nature and gravity of the crime but not the criminal which are germane for consideration of appropriate punishment in a most valuable and priceless possession that is dignity 9 the law regulates social interests arbitrates conflicting claims and demands security of 375 and 376 have been substantially changed by criminal law amendment act 1983 and several new sections were introduced by the relevant circumstances in a dispassionate manner by the court such act of balancing is indeed a difficult task it has been c and 376 d rape is defined in section 375 sections 375 and 376 have been substantially changed by criminal law dennis councle mcgdautha v state of california 402 us 183 28 l d 2d 711 that no formula of a foolproof
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Munna Choubey and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-24-2005
Reported in : AIR2005SC682; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)510; 2005(1)BLJR330; (2005)3CALLT62(SC); 2005CriLJ913; JT2005(2)SC122; (2005)2SCC710
1 376 2 376a 376b 376c 376d 450 criminal law criminal law amendment act 1983 sections 375 376a 376b 376c 376d 376 1 376 2 376a 376b 376c 376d 450 criminal law criminal law amendment act 1983 sections 375 376a 376b 376c 2 376a 376b 376c 376d 450 criminal law criminal law amendment act 1983 sections 375 376a 376b 376c 376d reduction of of law when faced with such evidence and such cruel acts to give the lesser punishment for the accused would be respondents faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 450 376 1 109 1 of the indian penal code dennis councle mcgdautha v state of callifornia 402 us 153 28 l d 2d 711 that no formula of a foolproof
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDilip Pandurang Kamath and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through C ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-14-2005
Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR1193
sub section 2 of section 309 of the code of criminal procedure 1973 is not applicable to the sessions judge in the apex court has considered the provisions of the criminal law amendment act 1952 and relevant provisions of the criminal procedure we suggest the government of maharashtra to effect the appropriate amendments in sub section 5 of section 5 of the mcoc the sub section 5 of section 5 of the mcoc act are very much desired by this amendment under special circumstances which has already been granted by exercise of power under section 309 2 of the code of criminal procedure 1973 this under section 309 of the code of criminal procedure 1973 28 in this respect we make a reference to the matter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnurag Tripathi Son of Late Ravi Shankar Tripathi Vs. State of U.P. an ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-25-2005
Reported in : 2005CriLJ3474
no 94 2005 under section 302 307 332 ipc 7 criminal law amendment act at police station gopiganj and the revisionist judicial magistrate has committed illegality and error by misinterpreting the law cited above therefore the impugned order be set aside 11 under section 302 307 332 ipc and 7 criminal law amendment act against unknown persons copy of the f i r section 302 307 332 ipc and 7 criminal law amendment act against unknown persons copy of the f i r is the opposite parties who were named in the application under section 156 3 cr p c they have also not yet revisionist s application under section 156 3 cr p c 28 accordingly this revision is allowed the impugned order dated 14
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsokan Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-03-2005
Reported in : 2005CriLJ3848; 2005(3)KLT770
examine those witnesses was also specifically provided the code of criminal procedure was amended in the year 1973 section 209 of in a judicial proceeding or before any person authorized by law to take it is relevant for the purpose of proving special rules 1999 unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications the case is admissible under section 33 of the evidence act in the case of those accused persons as well 5 the new code in view of the mandatory provisions of section 306 5 of the code of criminal procedure after examining these appeals are filed by the accused who were convicted 28 the counsel appearing for the appellants in all these appeals
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhojraj Kisan Bhagat Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-04-2005
Reported in : 2005(4)MhLj513
dispute that respondent no 2 and his driver were facing criminal prosecution bearing criminal case no 773 of 1998 for the the act the bench was considering section 8 of criminal law amendment act 1952 which is identically worded in paragraph 18 act the bench was considering section 8 of criminal law amendment act 1952 which is identically worded in paragraph 18 of 1947 especially when sections 161 to 165 a both inclusive act no 45 of 1960 have been omitted by introducing section under section 161 of indian penal code and also under sections 145 and 147 e of the bombay police act this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZubair S/O Mumtaz (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-16-2005
Reported in : 2005CriLJ3040
sections 452 376 506 120b 201 ipc and section 7 criminal law amendment act p s chhapar district muzaffar nagar 3 granted bail earlier 10 the apex court in the aforesaid law report has further observed that suffice it to say that 376 506 120b 201 ipc and section 7 criminal law amendment act p s chhapar district muzaffar nagar 3 the allegation committed rape on that girl and because the role of actually raping the girl was not assigned to mukhtar rahi riyasat 2003 under sections 452 376 506 120b 201 ipc and section 7 criminal law amendment act p s chhapar district muzaffar
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishan Lal Son of Sohan Lal and NavIn Kumar JaIn Son of Vinay Kumar Ja ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-15-2005
Reported in : 2005CriLJ227
482 467 468 120b i p c and section 7 criminal law amendment act police station brindawan district mathura after taking courts below shall decide the said application in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties by a 468 120b i p c and section 7 criminal law amendment act in the circumstances there is no allegation of misappropriation is only under section 424 i p c land acquisition act 1894 c a no 1 1894 section 4 sushil harkauli on the contrary the first information report was registered under sections 332 353 419 420 481 482 467 468 120b i
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiv Karmpal Sahu, Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Oct-28-2005
Reported in : [2006(108)FLR984]; [2006(1)JCR245(Jhr)]
who himself was a terrorist extremist or is a listed criminal subsequently the then government of bihar through its home special the indian penal code and section 17 of the criminal law amendment act a copy of which has been enclosed as indian penal code and section 17 of the criminal law amendment act a copy of which has been enclosed as annexure of the indian penal code and 27 of the arms act he was also suspect accused in ramakant jaiswal s murder 120 b of the indian penal code as also under section 17 of the c l a act was instituted has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT