Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 28 - Judgment Search Results

State Vs. Shankar Bhaurao Khirode

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1959Bom437; (1959)61BOMLR591; 1959CriLJ1153; ILR1959Bom1088

taken cognizance of the case under section 190 of the criminal procedure code and therefore the fact that sanction of government is perfectly consistent with section 8 1 of the criminal law amendment act which as already stated enables the court of had been made under section 10 of the criminal law amendment act which provided that all cases triable by a special special judge under section 7 1 of criminal law amendment act 1952 2 the present reference has been made by the 1 of section 6 are triable by special judges only section 8 deals with the procedure and powers of special judges

iqbal Singh Vs. State, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1977CriLJ501; ILR1977Delhi100

order the petition accordingly fails and is hereby dismissed i criminal law amendment act 1952 sections 6 and 8 criminal procedure section 2 a does not dispense with the requirement of law to examine a person to whom pardon was tendered before far they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment act it being within the province of a special judge of the amendment act 23 section 8 of the amendment act being a specific provision entitling a special judge to take 5 2 of the prevention of corruption act 1947 and sections 161 and 165 indian penal code triable by a special

Major E.G. Barsay and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1958CriLJ1144

and 3 are not only charged with the offence of criminal conspiracy to do certain illegal acts including offences under section where a person subject to military naval or air force law is brought before a magistrate and charged with an offence decision of mr as the provisions of the criminal law amendment act 1952 seem to be in pari materia with the act it may comprise the commission of a number of acts if that be the true position in respect of a offences dealt with by chapter vi of the army act sections 34 to 68 dealing with purely military offences section 69 tried by a court martial at one time under rule 28 2 a charge means an accusation contained in a charge

Raju @ Rajan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Inspector of P ...

Court : Chennai

ipc would not stand attracted for the aforesaid reasons this criminal appeal shall stand allowed the conviction and sentence passed by 2 s age was above 18 and below 20 criminal law amendment act 2013 13 of 2013 under which sexual intercourse s age was above 18 and below 20 criminal law amendment act 2013 13 of 2013 under which sexual intercourse with interaction between her and appellant a1 could also be an act of volition so considered the appellant safely cannot be convicted and below 20 criminal law amendment act 2013 13 of 2013 under which sexual intercourse with a girl below aged 18 prayer criminal appeal filed under section 374 r w 382 of the code of criminal procedure

Matsheng Jacob Chake Vs. the State

Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

endumeni municipality 2012 4 sa 593 sca para 18 summary criminal procedure rdquo euro amendment of s 309 1 a the cla was repealed by s 2 of the criminal law sentencing amendment act 38 of 2007 the sentencing act which 593 sca para 18 summary criminal procedure rdquo euro amendment of s 309 1 a of the criminal procedure act december 2007 s 309 1 a of the criminal procedure act read as follows 1 a any person convicted of any v alam 2011 2 sacr 553 wcc approved comparative citation 2013 zasca 141 subject to leave to appeal being granted in terms of section 309b or 309c appeal against such conviction and against any

K.M. Sundaram, Executive Committee Member, Communist Party of India, T ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1971)1MLJ196

to 10 and they followed the procedure provided under the criminal procedure code in making such arrests section 54 of the indian penal code and section 7 1 of the criminal law amendment act these arrests were made by the police officers penal code and section 7 1 of the criminal law amendment act and was remanded by s d m gudalur respondent code and section 7 1 of the criminal law amendment act 1932 are cognizable i e that a police officer may by the government of tamil nadu making the offences under sections 188 and 506 indian penal code cognizable and non bailable

In Re: Bisabathuni Ramalingayya

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad391

and 148 penal code are bailable under the code of criminal procedure by analogy the offence under section 17 1 criminal is afraid that the language used in section17 3 criminal law amendment act of 1908 will make it impossible for this afraid that the language used in section17 3 criminal law amendment act of 1908 will make it impossible for this court other government officers or do any other violent or dangerous act if released on bail so i direct him bisabathuni ramalingayya right in suitable cases to be released on bail under sections 497 and 498 criminal p c section 17 3 merely

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

of the case by mr nambiar was that accused in criminal cases must be treated alike no distinction should be made wait no hurry representatives elected by the people to make laws must determine policies which ought to govern people the ct affects alike all persons similarly situated is not within the amendment in the execution of admitted powers unnecessary proceedings are often be a member or takes part in any of its activities or collects funds he is liable to be punished with non bailable notwithstanding anything contained in the criminal procedure code section 496 cr p c provides for the grant of bail was provided rashid ahmad v municipal board kairana 1950 1scr566 28 i have therefore no hesitation in holding that the restrictions

Zahoor Ahmad Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1975CriLJ978; 1974(7)WLN298

special judges only thus excluding the jurisdiction of the ordinary criminal courts sub section 3 of section 7 however provides that this serious evil certain provisions were made by the criminal law amendment act a special forum was created with a view enumerated in sec tion 6 1 of the criminal law amendment act my answer to the question is that the word offences in section 6 1 of the criminal law amendment act meaning of bhim raj also rendered assistance to the court ahmed assistant registrar co operative department jalore for offences under section 161 indian penal code and section 5 2 of the this revision application is accepted and the ordar dated february 28 1973 of the court below in set aside prevention of

Khazansingh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj221

to give effect to section 5 1 a of the criminal law amendment amending act 1966 mr the language of section relevant law and the changes made therein 5 the criminal law amendment act act no xlvi of 1952 amended the indian joint application praying that in view of the criminal law amendment amending act 1966 they being commissioned officers of the indian or criminal therefore the hearing of the reference of an action and all matters in difference is not a trial within unless the charge is framed the language of both sub sections 5 1 a and 5 1 b is identical to 1920 pat 595 manohar dass v birandari air 1936 lah 280 and mt barkat bibi v fateh ali air 1949 lah