Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 91 of about 4,465 results (0.160 seconds)

Rambhai Manja Nayak, Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1983)34CTR(Guj)230; (1983)1GLR623; [1983]142ITR211(Guj)

..... any moneys or other assets which have not been or which ought to be disclosed by the transferee for the purpose of the act, or the indian income-tax act, 1922, or the wealth-tax act, 1957. 8. before initiating such proceedings, the competent authority must record his reasons for doing so. sub. s. (2) of ..... satisfy the conditions of art. 31(2) of the constitution. we are, however, presently examining the challenge on the basis that the newly introduced chapter in the act covers two distance subjects, namely, acquisition of immovable property and realisation of penalty. in other words, we are examining the validity of the said provisions ..... was, however, not taken consideration while making the aforesaid observation). 40. two questions, therefore, arise for consideration, namely : (1) does the newly added chapter in the act seek to compulsorily acquire immovable property for a public purpose; and (ii) whether the amount payable for the acquired property fixed by the impugned legislation is .....

Haji Siddik Haji Umar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC259; 1983(1)SCALE48; (1983)1SCC408; [1983]2SCR249

..... (xii of 1949), or under any other corresponding law 'repealed by the administration of evacuee property ordinance, 1949 (xxvii of 1949), then notwithstanding anything contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force, such proceeding shall be disposed of as if the definitions of 'evacuee property' and 'evacuee' contained in ..... saurashtra on july 3, 1954. this decision again was not questioned in any court. a notification under section 12 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954 was issued in respect of the properties in question on june 8, 1955. no further effective action appears to have been taken by haji umar kasam ..... the meaning of this act and accordingly, any order made or other action taken by the custodian or, any other authority in relation to such property shall be deemed to have been validly and lawfully made or taken.28. finality of orders under this chapter-save as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, every order made by .....

Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1983WLN295

..... a decree for account could also be passed against a principal in a proper case. similarly a decree for 'count could be passed against an infringe of a patent, copyright or trade mark on the best's that the order of the right might treat the infringe as his agent. similarly, where there were mutual accounts between the plaintiff and ..... the precise amount which was due to him from the defendant the contracts were entered into in the year 1956 and the work had also been finished in the year 1957; yet the final bills were not settled till the plaintiff filed the suit on november 16, 1965. further the plaintiff was not in a position to know the exact ..... v. banwari lal tandon : air1959all546 , if was held that although there was no provision for a suit by an agent against his principal, either in the contract act or in the limitation act, & normally such a suit would not lie but in the circumstance specified, a suit for accounts was maintainable. it was father observed as under in the aforesaid case .....

Rajesh Tarachand Sajdeh Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1983)LC427DTri(Mum.)bai

..... by the advocate, it is seen that the revision petition was received in the ministry on 25-10-82 by which date new chapter xv of the customs act had already come into existence under notification no. g.s.r. 597 (e) dated 11-10-82 and g.s.r. ..... i.r. 1954 s.c. 4; and a.i.r. 1953 page 411, a.i.r.1963 page 1094 and a.i.r. 1957 supreme court page 637 and read out the relevant head notes. he also submitted a copy of the bombay high court's judgment in the ..... treated as an informer and his identity has to be kept secret and cannot be disclosed under provisions of section 125 of the evidence act. this alleged infirmity cannot be treated as hitting the acceptability of the statement of shri sajdeh.the statement itself has been signed by ..... the submissions of the advocate on the grounds that the original statement dated 14-8-80 was recorded under section 108 of the customs act. under provisions of this law, the person summoned was bound to state the truth and therefore the statement dated 14-8-80 was .....

Kartar Singh Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in : (1983)5ITD75(Asr.)

..... which have not been or which ought to be disclosed by the transfer for the purpose of income-tax, 1922, income-tax act, 1961 or wealth-tax act, 1957. hence in pursuance of section 269c of the income-tax act, 1961. i hereby initiate the proceedings for the acquisition of the aforesaid property by the issue of notice under section 269d() of ..... or any area described in item (b) of the aforementioned provision. the action for acquisition under chapter xxa of the act started on the basis of a complaint dated 7-7-1980 received by the iac. the iac asked the inspector to make enquiries and after getting his report ..... undisputed position is that the jand sold is agricultural and was not situated in an area mentioned as an exception in section 2(14)(iii) of the income-tax act, 1961 ('the act'). in other words, the land is situated in a village, which is not comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, etc, as described in item (a) .....

Arizona Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

..... states government's treatment of indian tribes, its failure to protect indian water rights for use on the reservations it set aside for them, is one of the sorrier chapters." national water comm'n, water policies for the future -- final report to the president and to the congress of the united states 475. president nixon admitted as much ..... (1929), 281 u. s. 281 u.s. 179, decree entered, 281 u. s. 281 u.s. 696 (1930), temporarily modified, 352 u. s. 945 (1956), 352 u.s. 983 (1957), superseded, 388 u. s. 388 u.s. 426 (1967); new jersey v. new york, 283 u. s. 336 , decree entered, 283 u. s. 805 (1931), modified, 347 u. s ..... directive, this court has applied to disputes between states over entitlement to water from interstate streams. nor was the local law of prior appropriation necessarily controlling. the project act itself was held to have created a comprehensive scheme for the apportionment among california, nevada, and arizona of the lower basin's share of the mainstream waters of the .....

M. Karunanidhi Vs. Dr. H.V. Hande and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC558; 1983(1)SCALE344; (1983)2SCC473; [1983]2SCR629

..... one of us (venkataramiah, j.) had occasion to deal with the corresponding sub-section (3) of section 89 of the jammu & kashmir representation of the people act, 1957 which reads:every election petition should be accompanied by as many copies thereof as there are respondents mentioned in the petition and every such copy shall be attested by ..... ) any schedule or annexure to the petition shall also be signed by the petitioner and verified in the same manner as the petition.16. the next chapter which is chapter iii deals with the trial of election petitions but here we are concerned only with sub-section (1) of section 86 which interdicts that the high court ..... a law made by parliament under article 327 of the constitution to provide for adjudication of disputes regarding such elections. part vi of the act is headed 'disputes regarding elections' and chapter ii in that part deals with the presentation of election petitions to the high court. section 80 provides that no election shall be called .....

Diamond Publications Vs. Hind Pustak Bhawan

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 23(1983)DLT423

..... english speaking gowk published under pustak bhandar and pustak mahal. the plaintiffs got it registered in 1976 under the copyright act, 1957 and also got the trade mark rapidex registered in december, 1977 under the trade and merchandize marks act, 1958. they spent 6 to 8 lakhs of rupees by way of advertisement and publicity over it and ..... and confirmed the exparte injunction. hence, this appeal. (3) i have heard the learned counsel for the parties. there is no infringement of the trade mark. some chapters of the offending book are ^ shown to be similar to those of the plaintiffs' book but their earlier editions do not have the same material. there was, ..... english speaking coune. the plaintiffs complained that the defendants have infringed the trade mark and copyright of the plaintiffs. they have also copied the scheme of presentation of the text matter of the said publication of the plaintiffs. the chapters prepared by the defendants in respect of their book are on the same pattern as that .....

Anderson Vs. Celebrezze

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . v. socialist workers party, 440 u.s. at 440 u. s. 186 ; sweezy v. new hampshire, 354 u. s. 234 , 354 u. s. 250 -251 (1957) (opinion of warren, c.j.). [ footnote 17 ] in short, the primary values protected by the first amendment -- "a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues ..... to provide early access for presidential candidates. recently, in cbs, inc. v. fcc, 453 u. s. 367 (1981), this court held that, under the federal communications act, a presidential candidate had a right to television access as early as december, 1979, some 11 months before the election. [ footnote 2/6 ] the court says that, ..... the united states: a socioeconomic analysis to 1870, pp. 28-57 (1981). [ footnote 24 ] cf. oregon v. mitchell, 400 u. s. 112 (1970) (upholding act of congress forbidding states to disqualify voters in presidential elections for failure to meet state residency requirements). [ footnote 25 ] a similar analysis applies to the court of appeals' assertion .....

State of Bihar Vs. Radha Krishna Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC684; 1983(1)SCALE789; (1983)3SCC118; [1983]2SCR808

..... diverse fact and figures, data and documents spreading over a period of almost two centuries. the last chapter consists of the oral evidence of the pedigree propounded by the plaintiffs and we shall deal with the ..... by a deceased person can only be admitted where it is clearly shown that the entires relate to an act or acts done by the deceased person and not by third parties.57. these observations, however, have to be ..... amol kuer . . . nand prasad . (adopted) .--------------------------------------. . . . . . bansgopal hari kishore ram sankata . . (childless) kumar prasad ram chandra . (childless) (childless) (living) .------------------------. . . bhagwati prasad ilaka singh (d. 29th (childless) june, 1957) . . .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . radha sri ram sheo ashta maina ram bhagi- krishna krishna krishna krishna bhuja kesari rathi (plain = shail tiff) kumari . . . . .------------. .-------------. . . .....