Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 95 of about 4,465 results (0.108 seconds)

Budha Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1985Raj104; 1984()WLN291

..... to sub-section (1), as from the date of the commencement of the rajasthan tenancy (amendment) act, 1979, hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the 'said date', become subject to the other provisions contained in this chapter, the khatedar tenant of that part of the land held by him in which he has not acquired ..... , 1970 - 4. the rajasthan colonisation (bhakra project gadolia lohars allotment of government lands) rules, 1955. 5. the rajasthan colonisation (chambal project government lands allotment and sale) rules 1957. 6. the rajasthan colonisation (grant of land for residence in chak abadi) rules, 1959. 7. the rajasthan colonisation (allotment of land to co-operative societies) rules, 1959. ..... articles 14, 19 or 31(2). even if it were not so, they would be under the protective umbrella of article 31b. indubitably, the provisions of chapter iib are a law related to agrarian reform and thus protected.' (paras 31 and 34)83. in my considered opinion, the principles laid down by the apex .....

M. Krishna Murthy and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Prad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1985]152ITR163(AP)

..... not include any stock-in-trade, consumable stores or raw materials held for the purpose of his business or profession. true, some intangible assets like technical know-how, copyright, trademark and so on are treated as capital assets. they have value in terms of money. the question is whether leave standing to the credit of an employee has ..... s. 40(c)(iii), which was the forerunner of s. 40(a)(v), which later re-emerged as s. 40a(5). all these provisions occur in the chapter dealing with the computation of business income and impose a ceiling upon the extent of deduction to be allowed in respect of its business expenditure incurred by a company in ..... finding that it was incorrectly decided, superseded the judgment by enacting the explanation to s. 10(14) with retrospective effect from april 1, 1962, by the finance act, 1975, by which the position was clarified that the allowance was meant for meeting personal expenses at the place where the duties of the office are ordinarily performed. in .....

Capital Cities Cable, Inc. Vs. Crisp

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , it is possible for cable systems to comply with the oklahoma ban by simply abandoning their importation of the distant broadcast signals covered by the copyright act. but such a loss of viewing options would plainly thwart the policy identified by both congress and the fcc of facilitating and encouraging the importation ..... revision, the court had determined that the retransmission of distant broadcast signals by cable systems did not subject cable operators to copyright infringement liability because such retransmissions were not "performances" within the meaning of the 1909 copyright act. teleprompter corp. v. columbia broadcasting system, inc., 415 u. s. 394 (1974); fortnightly corp. v. united ..... ordinarily consider questions not specifically passed upon by the lower court, see california v. taylor, 353 u. s. 553 , 353 u. s. 557 , n. 2 (1957), this rule is not inflexible, particularly in cases coming, as this one does, from the federal courts. see, e.g., youakim v. miller, 425 u. s. 231 .....

Entertaining Enterprises, Madras and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1984Mad278

..... be construed as including any work produced by any process analogous to cinematography. though the indian copyright act, 1957, was modelled on the english copyright act, 1956, when the english copyright act was amended providing for copyright in respect of television the indian act was not amended. but, on the other hand, it introduced chapter viii regarding the rights of broadcasting authorities, and section 37 provided that 'where any programme ..... is broadcast by radio-diffusion by the government or any other broadcasting authority, a special right to be known as 'broadcast reproduction right' shall subsist in such programme'. even though the copyright act, 1957 did not provide for any copyright in respect of shows shown .....

Kesar Singh Guleria Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1202

..... his application for temporary release, to visit and to be with the ailing relative as frequently and for as long a period as possible. para 741 of chapter xxv of the manual for the superintendence and management of jails in the punjab gives enough discretion to the inspector general of prisons to confine or transfer any ..... a more dangerous criminal and that such intermittent bouts of temporary release from incarceration may soften his criminal proclivity.11. now, while implementing the relevant provisions of the act and rules and while exercising thereunder the powers relating to the temporary release of prisoners, the administration is under a duty to bear in mind certain cardinal and ..... are fulfilled, the competent authority will be under an obligation to exercise the discretion in furtherance of such purpose (see : in re : kerala education bill, 1957 air 1958 sc 956 at page 975). the exercise of power of releasing a prisoner on parole or furlough must not, therefore, be looked upon as an .....

Allen Vs. Wright

Court : US Supreme Court

..... u. s. 501 (1975)). see 441 u.s. at 441 u. s. 112 . cf. conley v. gibson, 355 u. s. 41 , 355 u. s. 45 -46 (1957). [ footnote 2/2 ] as i have recognized in n. 1, supra, we must accept as true the factual allegations made by the respondents. it nonetheless should be noted that significant ..... [respondents'] approach would have the federal courts as virtually continuing monitors of the wisdom and soundness of executive action; such a role is appropriate for the congress, acting through its committees and the 'power of the purse;' it is not the role of the judiciary, absent actual present or immediately threatened injury resulting from unlawful governmental ..... we held that plaintiffs had not alleged a judicially cognizable injury. "[a]ssertion of a right to a particular kind of government conduct, which the government has violated by acting differently, cannot alone satisfy the requirements of art. iii without draining those requirements of meaning." 454 u.s. at 454 u. s. 483 . see also united .....

Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC1622; (1984)86BOMLR536; 1984CriLJ1738; 1984(2)SCALE445; (1984)4SCC116; [1985]1SCR88

..... not been proved conclusively so as to raise an irresistible inference that manju's death was a case of blatant homicide.127. this now brings us to an important chapter of the case on which great reliance appears, to have been placed by mr. jethmalani on behalf of the appellant. unfortunately, however, the aspect relating to ..... a few cases --tufail's case : (1969)3scc198 (supra). ramgopal's case : 1972crilj473 (supra). chandrakant nyalchand seth v. state of bombay (criminal appeal no. 120 of 1957 decided on 19-2-1958), dharambir singh v. state of punjab (criminal appeal no. 98 of 1958 decided on 4-11-1958). there are a number of other cases where ..... . john roberts in their book the melancholy marriage' observe that-studies of attempted suicide cases have also revealed the high incidence of marital problems which lie behind the act. in our own study of 100 consecutive cases (roberts and hooper 1969), we found that most of them could be understood if the patients' interactions with others .....

Goa, Daman and Diu Board of Secondary Education Vs. Kumari Hema Laad a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC1584; 1984(2)SCALE171; (1984)4SCC58; [1985]1SCR430; 1984(16)LC1108(SC)

..... clauses (1) and (2) of rule 37 of the rules framed by the administrator of goa, daman and diu under goa, daman and diu secondary and higher secondary education board act as ultra vires and invalid insofar as they prohibit inspection and/or revaluation of answer books. in reaching the said conclusion on the validity of the impugned rules the high ..... high court and uphold the validity of clauses (1) and (2) of rule 37 of the rules framed under the goa, daman and diu secondary and higher secondary education board act. these appeals are allowed and the writ petitions filed in the high court will stand dismissed. the appellant will get its costs from the respondents.

V.P. Dhingra Vs. Nihal Singh, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1985Delhi8; ILR1985Delhi482

..... this petition under article 227 of the constitution of india raises an important question of the inter- pretation of section 15(3) of the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and rules 79(a), 81 and 82 of the delhi municipal corporation (election of councillors) rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the rules). the decision ..... delegated. the rules have been framed in exercise of the powers conferred by section 31 of the act. rules covering the disputes regarding elections are contained in part iv. chapter i of it provides for the definitions in rule 79. chapter ii deals with the election petitions and contains rules 80 to 91. the rules are to be ..... considered as of the same effect as if contained in the act. the rules made under the act are to be treated for all .....

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Farasol Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1987]163ITR364(Raj)

..... liability to deduct tax at source from the payments made to non-residents and that in view of the aforesaid payment by the assessee under part b of chapter xvii of the act, the appellate assistant commissioner deleted the disallowance of rs. 2,36,007 made by the income-tax officer. with regard to the expenses claimed by the ..... by the assessee in respect of that venture during prior years must be allowed while assessing the profits of that venture.15. in gustad dinshaw irani's case : [1957]31itr92(bom) the assessee was a partner in several firms doing restaurant business in bombay and during the course of the assessment for the assessment year 1951-52, ..... assessment year in question, the said expenses could be claimed by the assessee. in support of the aforesaid submission, shri aneja has placed reliance on gustad dinshaw irani v. cit : [1957]31itr92(bom) gappumal kanhiyalal v. cit : [1961]42itr446(all) and security printers of india (p.) ltd. v. cit [1970] 78 itr 766 (all). shri surolia, on .....