Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 88 of about 4,465 results (0.133 seconds)

Oct 20 1981 (TRI)

Ram Gopal Neotia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (1982)1ITD160(Kol.)

..... thousand rupees, the income-tax officer shall refer the case to the inspecting assistant commissioner who shall, for the purpose, have all the powers conferred under this chapter... for the imposition of penalty.a perusal of this provision makes it abundantly clear that the iac will have the jurisdiction over the subject-matter of a ..... and the assessee, and so these appeals by the assessee were not competent, the departmental representative has relied on the following decisions: cit v. army & navy stores ltd. [1957] 31 itr 959 (bom.), jivatlal purtupshi v. cit [1967] 65 itr 261 at page 267 (bom.), m.n. annaiah v. cit [1970] 76 itr 582 at ..... any preexisting relationship between the parties or not. it is not necessary, in order to attract the applicability of the doctrine of promissory estoppel, that the promisee, acting in reliance on the promise, should suffer any detriment. what is necessary is only that the promisee should have altered his position : the alteration of position need .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1981 (HC)

Everest Pictures Circuit, Salem Vs. S. Karuppannan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1982Mad244; (1982)1MLJ100

..... a preliminary issue and accepted the contention of the civil revision petitioner, the defendant in the suit, that as per section 62 of the copyright act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as the act, the suit ought to have been instituted only in the district court and ordered the return of the plaint. as against the order of ..... with the jurisdiction of courts, reads as follows-'62. (1) every suit or other civil proceedings arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of any other right conferred by this act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction.(2) ..............'bearing these provisions in mind, we have to decide whether the ..... having jurisdiction. further the court-fee was paid u/s. 25(c) of the court-fees act, which relates to the courtfee payable for reliefs under the copyright act. if the suit is not one contemplated under the copyright act then the relief of declaration and injunction will have to be valued according to the other provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1981 (SC)

Western Coalfields Limited Vs. Special Area Development Authority, Kor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC697; (1982)2CompLJ793(SC); 1981(3)SCALE1775; (1982)1SCC125; [1982]2SCR1

..... land and that, therefore, the amendment was subject to the overriding power of parliament as declared in section 15 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957. by the aforesaid declaration and the enactment of section 15, the whole of the field relating to minor minerals had come within the jurisdiction of parliament and ..... authority; to make provision for the compulsory acquisition of land required for the purpose of the development plans and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid'. chapter viii of the act, consisting of sections 64 to 71, is entitled 'special areas'. section 64 empowers the state government to declare any area as a special area by ..... 135 create, by their own force, the liability to be brought to property tax and the right to levy that tax. they provide:notwithstanding anything contained in this chapter, as and from the financial year 1976-77, there shall be charged, levied and paid for each financial year a tax on the lands or buildings or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 1981 (FN)

Widmar Vs. Vincent

Court : US Supreme Court

..... teach, what may be taught, how it shall be taught, and who may be admitted to study." sweezy v. new hampshire, 354 u. s. 234 , 354 u. s. 263 (1957) (frankfurter, j., concurring in result); see university of california regents v. bakke, 438 u. s. 265 , 438 u. s. 312 -313 (1978) (opinion of powell, j., ..... constituted protected "speech." rather, the dissent seems to attempt a distinction between the kinds of religious speech explicitly protected by our cases and a new class of religious "speech act[s]," post at 454 u. s. 285 , constituting "worship." there are at least three difficulties with this distinction. first, the dissent fails to establish that the ..... it is financing or otherwise supporting religious worship -- in maintaining a definitive separation between church and state -- is such an end. that the state truly does mean to act toward this end is amply supported by the treatment of religion in the state constitution. [ footnote 3/8 ] thus, i believe the interest of the state is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1982 (HC)

M. Thangavelu Chetty Vs. Chinnasamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ142

..... )(b), which is as follows:a. notwithstanding anything contained in the tamil nadu agriculturists relief act, 1938, the tamil nadu pawnbrokers act, 1943, the tamil nadu moneylenders act, 1957, the tamil nadu debt relief act, 1972, the tamil nadu indebted agriculturists' (temporary relief) act, 1976, the tamil nadu indebted persons (temporary relief) act, 1976, or in any other law for the time being in force or in ..... , contract or decree of court to the contrary, all debts payable by an agriculturist at the commencement of this act shall be scaled down in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.according to the supreme court, section 14 of the 1938 act which provides for separation of a debt incurred by a hindu family some members of which are agriculturists while others .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1982 (HC)

M. Thangavelu Chetty Vs. Chinnasamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1983Mad21

..... ), which is as follows:-'4, notwithstanding anything contained in the tamil nadu agriculturists relief act, 1938, the tamil nadu pawn brokers act, 1943, the tamil nadu moneylenders act, 1957, the tamil nadu debt relief act, 1972, the tamil nadu indebted agriculturists (temporary relief) act, 1976, the tamil nadu indebted persons (temporary relief) act, 1976, or in any other law for the time being in force or in ..... , contract or decree of court to the contrary, all debts payable by an agriculturist at the commencement of this act shall be sealed down in accordance with the provisions of this chapter'.'11. according to the supreme court, section 14 of the 1938 act which provides for separation of a debt incurred by a hindu family some members of which are agriculturists while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1982 (FN)

Railway Labor Executives' Assn. Vs. Gibbons

Court : US Supreme Court

..... (rejecting claim that statute applying, and referring by name, only to a single former president is a bill of attainder). cf. morey v. doud, 354 u. s. 457 (1957) (invalidating a statute expressly exempting the american express co. by name), overruled in new orleans v. dukes, 427 u. s. 297 (1976) (per curiam). in reviewing the ..... e), congress added the words "to employees" after "liability," apparently in reference to the tucker act remedy alluded to in new 124(c). [ footnote 6 ] section 124(c) provides that "[n]othing in this chapter or in the milwaukee railroad restructuring act . . . shall limit the right of any person to commence an action in the united states ..... ] prior to the drafting of the constitution, at least four states followed the practice of passing private acts to relieve individual debtors. nadelmann, on the origin of the bankruptcy clause, 1 am.j.legal hist. 215, 221-223 (1957). given the sovereign status of the states, questions were raised as to whether one state had to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1982 (SC)

V.T. Khanzode and ors. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC917; [1982(44)FLR317]; (1982)ILLJ465SC; 1982(1)SCALE316; (1982)2SCC7; [1982]3SCR411; 1982(1)SLJ466(SC)

..... 1948 framed under section 58 of the act, the terms and conditions of service of the staff (including officers) of the respondent bank were revised and regulated. these regulations were amended from time to time. provisions regarding record of service, seniority and promotion are contained in regulations 27 to 30 (chapter iii), which read thus :27. record ..... vested in it. in b.n. nagarajan v. state of mysore : (1967)illj698sc rule 3 of the mysore state civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1957 provided that recruitment to the state civil services shall be made by a competitive examination or by promotion and that the method of recruitment and qualifications shall be ..... namely, group iv with effect from april 1, 1955. the industrial finance department and the department of non-banking companies were added to group ii in september 1957 and march 1966, respectively. group v was created for the staff of the industrial department bank of india with effect from april 1, 1965. the composition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1982 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Rameshwar Prasad

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1983MP59

..... division bench of this court in union of india v. ibrahim gulaba, 1965 mplj 572: (air 1966 madh pra 52) in somewhat similar circumstances observed that rule 9 in chapter ii of the madhya pradesh high' court manual. 1960, provides that when the taxing officer certifies the under-stamping to be bona fide on an application duly made for the ..... of limitation. the decision in ganesh prasad's case (air 1953 sc 431) (supra) was followed by this court in goppolal v. ganpat-civil revision no. 395 of 1957, decided on 5-8-1958 and it was held that because of the late payment of court-fee and on condonation of that delay, the opposite party cannot make a ..... railways are exonerated of the liability. it was also pointed out that such a burden is also discharged by raising an adverse presumption under section 114 of the evidence act if the railway administration fails to produce relevant material on record, this decision is not helpful to the appellant in the present case as the forwarding note has not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1982 (HC)

Madan Lal JaIn Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi282; [1985]57CompCas782(Delhi); 21(1982)DLT432; 1982RLR549

..... : what is the extent of jurisdiction of motor accident claims tribunal constituted under section 1 10 of the act sections 110 to i i of were substituted in the act by act 100 of 1956 with effect from 16-2-1957. previously all claims for compensation arising out of motor accident were treated as ordinary civil suits to be adjudi ..... appellant. the respondents are not involved in any motor vehicle accident and as such the claim against them cannot be entertained by a claims tribunal under the act. the remedy if any against the respondents on account of their negligence in properly maintaining the roads lies only before the civil court and not before the tribunal ..... . the claims for compensation are restricted to the category of persons mentioned in section 110b of the act, i.e. the driver, owner or the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident. these sections occur in the chapter dealing with insurance of motor vehicles against third party risk. the object behind these sections is only .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //