Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 4,452 results (0.176 seconds)

Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78

..... to copyright. earlier, the law on copyright was governed by the indian copyright act, 1914, and the copyright act of 1911 passed by the parliament of the united kingdom as modified in its application to india by the indian copyright act, 1914, both of which acts are repealed by the present act of 1957. the act comprises in all 79 sections spread over subjectwise under 15 chapters. sections 1 to 6 of chapter i ..... provides for preliminaries such as title, extent, commencement of the act, definitions of various terms used in the act, viz., section 6 in particular, providing for decision .....

The Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Hansa Chemical Pharmacy

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1986(2)ARBLR303(Delhi); ILR1979Delhi236

..... sought to be ousted on the ground that the suit arises under chapter xii of the copyright act, 1957, and that the original jurisdiction in respect of such suits or other civil proceedings arising under the said chapter is that of the district court under section 62 of the said act. section 62 of the copyright act, 1957, reads as under : '62(1) every suit or other civil proceeding ..... section makes it clear that every suit or other civil proceeding arising under chapter xii in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by the copyright act, 1957, shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. i do not agree. the copyright act does not define the expression 'district court'. the question, thereforee, is what is .....

J.N. Bagga and ors. Vs. All India Reporter Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1969Bom302; (1969)71BOMLR409; 1969CriLJ1109; 1969MhLJ188

..... now be noted, i have already pointed out that there is no specific provision in the copyright act, 1957, regarding the place for filing criminal complaints. the provisions of the criminal procedure code regarding the place of an enquiry and trial in chapter xv are the only provisions which would help a court in finding our whether it has jurisdiction ..... . what is, therefore, alleged is that the advertisement in journals published at nagpur amount to 'an offer for sale' as contemplated by section 51(b)(i) of the copyright act 1957. not only the advertisement ..... soliciting customers to purchase the books and to place their orders with the publishers amount to 'an offer for sale' under section 51(b)(i) of the copyright act, 1957. the additional sessions judge, who made a reference on this point, has taken a contrary view.8. the two points of view, which are canvassed before .....

Espn Stars Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : LC2008(2)75; 2008(36)PTC492(Del)

..... reproduction rights are a special class of rights, recognized under part viii of the copyright act, 1957 (hereafter 'the act'). he relied upon section 37 for the purpose. according to counsel, section 37(3) provides, in clauses (a) to (e) acts deemed to be infringement of broadcast reproduction rights. according to the counsel, the unauthorized ..... section 37(3)(a) and also reproduction of the event under section 37(3)(d). learned counsel submitted that the only exception recognized under chapter viii of the act was the use, consistent with fair dealing, excerpts of any programme, in the broadcast of current event or bona fide review for teaching and ..... the express reference to certain provisions in section 39a rules out the application of all other provisions of the act in respect of broadcast reproduction rights which are a species of copyright and for which chapter viii constitutes a complete code. it was, thereforee, submitted that technical requirements such as the need to implead .....

Anuradha Paudwal and Another Vs. Brij Mohan Bhardwaj and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... sen, musician, m/s. sardar cassette company and m/s jain and company, on accusation of having committed the offence punishable under sections 61, 63, 65 and 69 of the copyright act, 1957 and sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 ipc. 3. the case set-up by the complainant, in brief, insofar as relevant was that, his father wrote many books. including the ..... violation of the provisions of' the copyright act. section 51 of chapter xi of the copyright act posits the variety of incidents of' infringement of copyright. whereas section 52 envisages the situation where certain acts will not amount to infringement of copyright acts. likewise, section 54 of chapter xii defines the expression of "owner of copyright", whereas civil ti remedies for infringement of such copyright has been provided under section 55 of .....

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Sushil Kumar Sitaldas Dhirani

Court : Kolkata

..... 2). person includes the registered proprietor and the registered user. section 62 of the copyright act: 62. (1) (2) jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this chapter.--every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this ..... act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. for the purpose of ..... company nor its branch office were at delhi and merely that the reseller sells its product neither fulfils the criterion enshrined under section 62 of the copyright act nor satisfies the conditions of section 20 of the code of civil procedure. the provision of section 20 of the code of civil procedure was .....

Holmes Vs. Hurst

Court : US Supreme Court

..... thus abandoned, we do not see how it could be reclaimed by collecting such parts together in the form of a book unless we are to assume that the copyright act covers the process of aggregation as well as that of intellectual production. the contrary is the fact. if the patent law furnishes any analogy in this particular -- and ..... be obtained after the several parts, whether published separately or collectively, had been in general circulation for years. surely this cannot be within the spirit of the act. under the english copyright act of 1845, provision is made for the publication of works in a series of books or parts, but it has always been held that each part of ..... is a book within the meaning of the act. henderson v. maxwell, l.r. 4 ch.div. 163; bradbury v. sharp, w.n. (1891) 143. we have not overlooked the inconvenience which our conclusions will cause if, in order to protect their articles from piracy, authors are compelled to copyright each chapter or installment as it may appear in a .....

Devendra Somabhai Naik Vs. Accurate Transheet Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2003Guj141

..... filed under section 72 of the copyright act, 1957 challenging the order passed by the copyright board dated 7th september, 2001, whereby it is held that article 137 of the limitation act, 1963 is not applicable to the application filed under section 50 of the copyright act, 1957. the board also held that the copyright board is, deemed to be ..... for the appellant submitted that the respondent herein filed an application under section 50 of the copyright act, 1957, on 4th may, 2000. according to him, it is filed beyond the time prescribed under article 137 of the limitation act, 1963. in the alternative, he submitted that the application was filed after five years of ..... to the provisions of section 72 wherein the jurisdiction of court in the matters arising under this chapter is provided and finally, he submitted that even under section 74 of the copyright act, 'registrar of copyrights and copyright board to possess certain powers of civil court'. he submitted that in view of these specific .....

Akhil Bhartiya Grahak Panchayat Vs. Bindumadhav

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... . it is contended that behind back of the association, in the year 2001, the defendant got registered aforesaid title and monogram under the copyright act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as act of 1957? for short) in is own name and he has shown himself as owner of the title and monogram. it is the case of ..... while considering the object behind provision of section 62 of the act 1957. section 62 of act 1957 is as under: 62. jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this chapter:- (1) every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right ..... conferred by this act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. ( .....

Shree Devendra Somabhai Naik Vs. Accurate Transheet Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)1GLR589; 2002(25)PTC434(Guj)

..... filed under section 72 of the copyright act, 1957 challenging the order passed by the copyright board dated 7th september, 2001, whereby it is held that article 137 of the limitation act, 1963 is not applicable to the application filed under section 50 of the copyright act, 1957. the board also held that the copyright board is, deemed to be ..... for the appellant, submitted that the respondent herein filed an application under section 50 of the copyright act, 1957, on 4th may, 2000. according to him, it is filed beyond the time prescribed under article 137 of the limitation act, 1963. in the alternative, he submitted that the application was filed after five years ..... to the provisions of section 72 wherein the jurisdiction of court in the matters arising under the chapter is provided and finally, he submitted that even under section 74 of the copyright act, 'registrar of copyrights and copyright board to possess certain powers of civil court'. he submitted that in view of these specific .....