Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... the report of the advisory committee of the copyright act, dated 5 november 1993. [2] section 29(1) provides: the judge or acting judge who is from time to time designated as commissioner of patents in terms of section 8 of the patents act, 1978, shall also be the copyright tribunal (in this chapter referred to as the tribunal) for the purposes ..... tortuous statutory scheme in terms of which the tribunal derives its power. as pointed out by dean in handbook of south african copyright law,[10]the factual matrix set out in chapter 3 of the act has to be read mutatis mutandis to accommodate the adjudication of disputes arising out of s 9a. this means that one has ..... of this act. section 36 provides for appeals from the tribunal to this court. [3] sampra was accredited as a representative .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... ] in this country the various customs statutes over many years have allowed for the imposition of anti-dumping duties. the current provisions are contained in chapter vi of the customs and excise act. the provisions have altered since the statute was enacted but at the time relevant to this appeal they existed substantially in their current form. the ..... 1995] zacc 9; 1995 (4) sa 615 (cc) para 36; minister of home affairs v liebenberg [2001] zacc 3; 2002 (1) sa 33 (cc) para 11. 64. act 33 of 1957. 65. [1995] zacc 8; 1995 (4) sa 877 (cc) para 33. 66. the passage is repeated in the current edition. daniel greenberg craies on legislation (9th ed, ..... them in the future to continue charging and collecting such duties. to this end they sought an order declaring the second schedule to the customs and excise act,60(the act), constitutionally invalid and asking the court to suspend the operation of that order, both retrospectively and prospectively. the effect of the suspension, so they thought, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... in the digest 44.2 sv de exceptione rei iudicatae. 2. johannes voet the selective voet being the commentary on the pandects (ganes translation, 1957) vol 6 at 560. the passage appears in a chapter headed the exception of res judicata. 3. wolff no v solomon (1898) 15 sc 297 at 306-307. 4. nestl (south africa) ..... of action. it alleges that since the conclusion of the agency agreement womag and the sachs family have failed to fulfil their obligations under the agreement and acted in a way that has created friction with caesarstones nominated distributor. on those grounds caesarstone contends that the agreement was cancelled and lapsed in december 2007 and ..... womag would receive a commission on the fob price of all sales made by caesarstone to the newly appointed distributor. in return for this commission it would act as caesarstones marketing advisor and representative, promoting its brand and products, assisting and overseeing the distributor. in addition womag had the right in its own name .....
Tag this Judgment!