Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Contend - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 10 2013

“contends That the Presence of the Counsel Representing the Bank Was ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-10-2013

on behalf of the management to argue the case despite several adjournments. Mr.Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner-Bank contends that this has resulted in miscarriage of justice. Furthermore written submissions had been placed on record of the


Jan 24 2013

“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

following order was passed by this Court on 11.1.2013:- CRM not M-458 of 2013 (O&M) 2 “Learned counsel contended that the police did not add any new offence subsequently. The argument, inter-alia, is that the present case


May 21 2013

“contends That on 24.1.2012 Petitioner Being Driver of Tempo Vs. Sta ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-21-2013

Criminal Misc. not M-40499 of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-40499 of 2012 Date of decision : May 21, 2013 Abdul Mazid ....Petitioner versus State of...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 16 2014

“learned Counsel Contends That from the Vs. State of Punjab and Othe ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-16-2014

before this Court on 8.2.2010 when the following order was passed:- CRM M-42755 of 2013 -2- “Learned counsel contends that from the medico legal aspect of the case it is established that the petitioner and another person


Feb 25 2014

“contends That the Dispute Between the Vs. State of Punjab --respond ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-25-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-31130 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.02.2014. Avinash Chawla & another --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...


Mar 11 2014

“contends That Son of Petitioners as Well as Vs. State of Haryana -- ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-11-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-32049 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.03.2014. Smt. Kamla Kataria & another --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA....


Mar 10 2014

“contends That Petitioner Is Ready to Keep the Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-10-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-20196 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.03.2014. Navdeep Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...


May 02 2014

“counsel Contends That the Matrimonial Dispute Vs. State of Punjab - ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-02-2014

Cell, Patiala. On 31.3.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court: “Counsel contends that the matrimonial dispute between the parties has since been settled and even a compromise between the complainant


May 01 2014

“contends That Though Report Under Section 173 Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-01-2014

CRM-M No.31188 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.31188 of 2013. Date of Decision : 01.05.2014. Ajit Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE...


May 05 2014

“counsel Contends That the Petitioner Has Been Vs. State of Punjab - ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-05-2014

Tarn Taran. While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 27.1.2014:- “Counsel contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Submission raised is that at the time


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial