Contend - Judgment Search Results
“contends That the Presence of the Counsel Representing the Bank Was ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-10-2013
on behalf of the management to argue the case despite several adjournments. Mr.Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner-Bank contends that this has resulted in miscarriage of justice. Furthermore written submissions had been placed on record of the
“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
following order was passed by this Court on 11.1.2013:- CRM not M-458 of 2013 (O&M) 2 “Learned counsel contended that the police did not add any new offence subsequently. The argument, inter-alia, is that the present case
“contends That on 24.1.2012 Petitioner Being Driver of Tempo Vs. Sta ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-21-2013
Criminal Misc. not M-40499 of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-40499 of 2012 Date of decision : May 21, 2013 Abdul Mazid ....Petitioner versus State of...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“learned Counsel Contends That from the Vs. State of Punjab and Othe ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
before this Court on 8.2.2010 when the following order was passed:- CRM M-42755 of 2013 -2- “Learned counsel contends that from the medico legal aspect of the case it is established that the petitioner and another person
“contends That the Dispute Between the Vs. State of Punjab --respond ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-31130 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.02.2014. Avinash Chawla & another --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
“contends That Son of Petitioners as Well as Vs. State of Haryana -- ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-32049 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.03.2014. Smt. Kamla Kataria & another --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA....
“contends That Petitioner Is Ready to Keep the Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-20196 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.03.2014. Navdeep Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
“counsel Contends That the Matrimonial Dispute Vs. State of Punjab - ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-02-2014
Cell, Patiala. On 31.3.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court: “Counsel contends that the matrimonial dispute between the parties has since been settled and even a compromise between the complainant
“contends That Though Report Under Section 173 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2014
CRM-M No.31188 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.31188 of 2013. Date of Decision : 01.05.2014. Ajit Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE...
“counsel Contends That the Petitioner Has Been Vs. State of Punjab - ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-2014
Tarn Taran. While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 27.1.2014:- “Counsel contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Submission raised is that at the time
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free