Skip to content


Consumer Dispute - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: consumer dispute Page 1 of about 77 results (0.039 seconds)
Dec 23 2005 (HC)

Deepa Vs. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006(1)KLT778

of the above order in the known language like a consumer may not feel any difficulty in understanding the meaning of adverse observations made against her, by the 1st respondent Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur, in an order passed by it. Seeking

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2002 (HC)

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

rely on behalf of party to the complaint before the Consumer Fora by physically remaining present on the date/dates of hearing. involve common issue as to whether parties before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (for short 'Consumer Forum') and Consumer Disputes Redressal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2003 (HC)

Tiptur Taluk Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Lim ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2003Kant307; ILR2003KAR1821; 2003(4)KarLJ18

to whether the claimants can answer to the definition of consumers or not because even assuming for purposes of argument that Section very specifically debars the Civil Court entertaining any such dispute notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 1997 (HC)

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1998Ker110; [1998]94CompCas717(Ker)

the subscriber against the petitioners is certainly maintainable before the Consumer Redressal Forum.4. Section 3 of the said Apt reads as more effective and speedy remedy available to the consumers. The dispute that can be sought redressal of by resorting to the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 2000 (HC)

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2000Ker250

331), while considering the scope of Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, held that the statutory authority not invested with has been provided, shall be determined inthe arbitration. All such disputes are not amenable for adjudication by the machinery set up

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 2004 (HC)

Mandira Mookerjee Vs. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum and o ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2005Cal108,2005(4)CHN694

granted on merit, as the case may be, by the Consumer Forum.4.3. On the other hand, he attempts to distinguish the Case No. 461 of 2003 pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, South 24 Parganas;d. Issue declaration that District Consumer

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2002 (HC)

Anand Kumar JaIn Vs. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhopa ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)MPHT430; 2002(3)MPLJ594

of such services. A complaint can be filed by a consumer. If the exposition of facts is appreciated in proper perspective the cheque. Thereafter the respondent No. 4 filed the Consumer Dispute before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum. Before the District

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2012 (HC)

Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Association Vs. Thrissur District Consumer ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2012(3)KLT277

or services provided, as the case may be, to such consumers: Provided further that the amount so obtained shall be credited They are aggrieved by the action of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thrissur in entertaining a complaint filed by the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2018 (HC)

K a Nagamani vs.national Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission & Anr

Court: Delhi

regard to enforcing the orders passed in respect of the consumer complaint. The petitioner contends that the proceedings to enforce an 14 would plainly not be an orders in a consumer dispute.34. At this stage, it is relevant to refer to Section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2003 (HC)

Atul Ch. Sarma Vs. President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal For ...

Court: Guwahati

in AIR 1996 Madras 427 held that the definition of consumer under Section 2(1)(d) does include the services rendered by Advocate. of with the approval of the first mentioned person;''(e) 'consumer dispute' means a dispute where the person against whom a complaint

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //