Constructive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constructive Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 355 results (0.033 seconds)Construction Society Limited Vs. M.S. Hashmi
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: May-05-1999
..... present appeal filed by police employees co operative house construction society anishabad hence onward referred as society is directed ..... personnel thus violating the bye laws of the housing construction society 3 he therefore urged that the irregularities committed ..... addressed to the secretary police employees co operative house construction society limited patna the location of the office of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. Employees Union Vs. Hindustan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(5)ALT251; (2001)IIILLJ192AP
..... by various organisations in that process the respondent company obtained a contract for certain construction works including the erection of blast furnace from visakhapatnam steel project visakhapatnam 3 ..... of india and section 9a of industrial disputes act 1947 company issued circular withdrawing construction allowance that was being to its employees petitioner union challenged validity of circular .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHydel Construction Ltd. Vs. H.P. State Electricity Board
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-07-1999
Reported in: AIR2000HP19
..... 2 the brief facts of the case are that for the construction of underground power house underground switch yard transformer hall and ..... the provisions of the contract agreement by the executive engineer bhaba construction division no 4 hpseb bhabanagar on 31 10 1989 certifying ..... have relied upon the judgment of the supreme court in hind construction contractors v state of maharashtra air 1979 sc 720 to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProgressive Constructions Ltd., Hyd Vs. Superintending Engineer, Irrig ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-21-1999
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD141; 1999(4)ALT281
..... the counsel have agreed for final disposal of the writ petition 2 the petitioner progressive constructions limited seeks to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 ..... 3 facts of the case in brief are as follows the matter relates to the construction of chitravathi balancing reservoir near pamapalli village balance work and rectification works at cuddapah district .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-08-1999
Reported in: AIR1999SC3710; [2000]99CompCas297(SC); 1999(3)CTC618; JT1999(8)SC142; 1999(6)SCALE486; (1999)8SCC436; [1999]Supp3SCR554; 2000(1)LC336(SC)
..... be used by the contractor exclusively for mobilisation expenditures including the acquisition of constructional plant in connection with the works should the contractor misappropriate any portion of ..... multipurpose project icha galudih complex adityapur jamshedpur bihar whereas m s the hindustan construction company limited incorporated in bombay under the companies act 1956 and having their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLanco Constructions Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Govt. of A.P., Irrigation and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)ALD5; 1999(4)ALT176
..... by the faction leaders otherwise it would be highly difficult for them to execute the construction works moreover the lowest tender quoted by xxxxxxx name withheld for confidentiality purpose with ..... the appellant the contention appears to be well founded reputed firms like l t orissa construction corporation hscl and jp industries participated in the tenders the superintending engineer and the chief .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBank Bandhu Co-operative Group Society Vs. Manasvi Construction Engine ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-31-1999
Reported in: (1999)123PLR850
..... the allegation of the petitioner that an agreement had been executed between the parties for construction of the flats houses by the petitioner for respondent no 1 therefore by clear implication ..... was having incapability to handle such projects due to which it could not undertake the construction work and thereby it suffered cost escalation and other consequences which ultimately caused loss to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Development Authority Vs. Skipper Construction and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-19-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)SCALE317
..... in the light of the terms of the contract between skipper construction company and d d a and the other respective parties thereto ..... that the question of deciding the inter se liabilities between skipper construction company and d d a has already been concluded by earlier ..... by learned senior counsel mr m l verma appearing for skipper construction co and also the learned senior counsel mr m n krishnamani .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Development Authority Vs. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-17-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)CTC507; JT1999(10)SC223; (2000)2MLJ64(SC); 1999(7)SCALE559; (2000)10SCC130; [1999]Supp5SCR512
..... 1 on may 6th 1996 this court delivered judgment in delhi development authority v skipper construction co p ltd air1996sc2005 thereafter various other issues regarding the skipper group of companies continued ..... in the rest of this judgment delhi development authority is described as dda and skipper construction company p ltd is described as skipper for convenience part a3 in october 1980 skipper .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaba Constructions and Another Vs. Ashok Korada and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-12-1999
..... and final reimbursement of all amount claimed by messrs baba constructions for constructing the said unit ..... as twelve months from the date of obtaining permission for construction from municipal corporation of hyderbad the above period shall be ..... period of four months depending upon the non availability of construction material or any unforseen circumstance either created by any government .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial