Constructive - Judgment Search Results

KleIn Vs. Burke Construction Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jury which resulted in a disagreement subsequent to the commencement of the action by the construction company viz on march 19 1920 petitioners instituted a suit in equity against that company ..... congress after its exercise has begun cannot well be described as a constitutional right the construction company however had the undoubted right under the statute to invoke the jurisdiction of the .....

Terral Vs. Burke Construction Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in contravention of the constitution of the united states the burke construction company a corporation organized under the laws of the state of ..... p 744 that it was organized for the purpose of doing construction work and carrying on interstate commerce and was actually so engaged ..... penalty fixed is not less than 1 000 a day the construction company avers that this act is in contravention of 2 article .....

United States Vs. Northeastern Construction Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 326 1922 u s supreme court united states v northeastern construction co 260 u s 326 1922 united states v northeastern construction company no 122 argued november 24 1922 decided december 4 .....

Great Northern Ry. Co. Vs. Merchants Elevator Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and to apply that meaning to the undisputed facts that operation was solely one of construction and preliminary resort to the commission was therefore unnecessary the petition for certiorari was asked ..... was sustained without preliminary resort to the commission the question involved was solely one of construction of a tariff or otherwise a question of law and not one of administrative discretion .....

United States Vs. Southern Pacific Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... california in 1866 congress passed an act to incorporate the atlantic pacific railroad company to construct a railroad near the thirty fifth parallel of latitude from springfield missouri to the pacific ..... of the central pacific obtained control of the southern pacific and subsequently the latter was constructed from goshen through tehachapi pass with one fork to a junction with the atlantic pacific .....

Wyoming Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with more means followed and reclaimed lands farther away then companies with large capital constructed extensive canals and occasional tunnels whereby water was carried to lands remote from the ..... s evidence one of her principal witnesses said with regard to financial practicability of construction of reservoirs on poudre river capable of conserving extraordinary floods will state that they .....

Texas Vs. Eastern Texas R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in intrastate commerce the company neither owns nor operates any other line the road was constructed in 1902 to serve extensive lumber industries but in subsequent years the adjacent timber was ..... that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require the construction or operation or construction and operation of such additional or extended line of railroad and no carrier .....

Hemangini Devi and anr. Vs. Raja Bejoy Singh Dudharia

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 73Ind.Cas.223

..... for the removal of an over bridge which the defendants had constructed over the pathway on the allegation that the pathway was a ..... that the plaintiff was precluded by reason of acquiescence in the construction of the overbridge from having it demolished 3 the court of ..... they wrote a letter to the plaintiff asking for permission to construct an over bridge the principal ground upon which the doctrine of .....

Sloan Shipyards Corp. Vs. U.S. Fleet Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... contracted may 18 1917 with a shipbuilding company for the construction of vessels on december l 1917 unlawfully took possession of ..... the laws of the district of columbia for the purchase construction and operation of merchant vessels the corporation to be ..... mass of urgent legislation in respect to the government s construction and operation of shipping made indispensable by the peculiar exigencies .....

Grant Smith-porter Ship Co. Vs. Rohde

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sitting in admiralty negligence of the employer respondent grant smith porter ship company in the construction and maintenance of a scaffold is alleged as the ground for recovering of damages ..... his injury to proceed in admiralty against respondent for the damages suffered the contract for constructing the ahala was nonmaritime and although the uncompleted structure upon which the accident occurred .....