Constructive - Judgment Search Results

The King (at the Prosecution of Arthur Zadig) Vs. Halliday

Court: House of Lords

..... downs in the region of individual liberty are on this construction possible without even altering the words of an existing regulation ..... of habeas corpus when the basis of his possible liberation is constructively denied the method is not unknown to english history but ..... the light of that practice the wide and entirely inferential construction of words about regulations for safety and defence which has .....

Mani Lall Sing Vs. the Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 44Ind.Cas.770

..... out or altering streets providing open spaces for purposes of ventilation or recreation demolishing or constructing buildings acquiring land for the said purposes and 2 for re housing of persons of ..... 78 should have been framed for such stray cases and that under the circumstances the construction contended for on behalf of the respondent should be preferred but the act contemplates alteration .....

Chicago, M. and St.P. Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... department or has been considered by this office or the department and permission for such construction has been specifically given after filing the third map the company sought permission from ..... the supervisor of the reserve saying advance permission given today st paul railroad company to construct railroad through coeur d alene subject usual stipulations supervise clearing and piling and scale .....

Owensboro Vs. Owensboro Water Works Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... while the second was granted for the existence of the corporation was evidence confirming this construction 3 respecting the contract concerning hydrants the second company became successor of the first only ..... used by the parties to the contract is indefinite or ambiguous and hence of doubtful construction the practical interpretation by the parties themselves is entitled to great if not controlling .....

Louisville Bridge Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... operate to confer an irrepealable franchise to maintain the bridge as authorized and originally constructed nor did they create a vested right demanding compensation under the fifth amendment when ..... upon appellant no irrepealable franchise to maintain its bridge precisely as it was originally constructed and created no vested right entitling appellant to compensation under the fifth amendment in .....

Farmers Irrigation Dist. Vs. O'Shea

Court: US Supreme Court

..... nebraska into irrigation districts and for the purpose of buying irrigating canals already constructed or partially constructed and paying for the same that the farmers irrigation district is the owner ..... statutory authority to acquire by purchase any irrigation ditches canals or reservoirs already constructed the supreme court of nebraska construing this statute as imposing the obligation to build .....

Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Ry. Co. Vs. Clough

Court: US Supreme Court

..... supreme court of the state the obligation assumed by companies deriving their franchises thereunder to construct their railways over streams watercourses and canals so as not to interfere with the free ..... its property without due process of law because in ascertaining the compensation the cost of constructing gates and a tower for operating them planking the crossing filling between the rails putting .....

The Secretary of State for India in Council, Through the Collector Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1918Mad608; 41Ind.Cas.24

..... tahsildar to the collector that the masonry weir at pettaikulam was constructed under the orders of the range officer and that it was ..... the next point for consideration refers to outlet no 2 the construction made by the defendant in the channel not far from the ..... kunnakudi channel flows into the periakulam no such channel has been constructed the question of three fifths and two fifths can only arise .....

United States Vs. California Bridge and Constr. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... have produced a different understanding than in the case of the principal having annulled a construction contract for default the united states relet the contract at higher cost under supplemental ..... cross appeal from the judgment denying recovery on the government s counterclaim the california bridge construction company hereinafter referred to as the bridge company on december 21 1898 with the .....

Darnell Vs. Edwards

Court: US Supreme Court

..... middle of june 1914 the road is of standard gauge and construction ballasted and built in a first class manner its traffic consists ..... points along the line to the terminus at batesville pending the construction of the road the batesville southwestern railroad company was organized as ..... revenue 1 20 of the amount expended by him in the construction of the road we are clear that this contention is .....