Constructive - Year 1992 - Judgments

Mar 21 1992 (HC)

Aditya Constructions, Reptd., by Its Partner, Sri Chiranjilal Vyas Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-21-1992

Reported in: 1992(3)ALT597

..... 3 b of the multistoreyed building regulations provides that every multistoreyed building to be constructed reconstructed added or altered and situated within the development area of hyderabad but ..... hyderabad municipal corporation act the floors in and height of the building and zone construction were severely restricted 7 petitioner submits that the zoning restrictions whereby different areas .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 1992 (SC)

M/S. Continental Construction Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Cen ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-15-1992

Reported in: AIR1992SC803; (1992)2CompLJ50(SC); (1992)101CTR(SC)386; [1992]195ITR81(SC); JT1992(1)SC140; 1992(1)SCALE65; 1992Supp(2)SCC567; [1992]1SCR57

..... showing the starting and completion dates for each complex and major installation including construction of the preliminary works submission of functional plants and general designs and periods ..... utilisation of technical knowledge or rendering of technical services necessary to bring about the construction assembly and installation however we need not theoretically eliminate all possibility of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 1992 (TRI)

income-tax Officer Vs. Mohd. Construction Co.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on: Sep-25-1992

Reported in: (1992)43ITD574(JP.)

..... issues involved were under sub clause iii shri birla himself conceded that the issue that construction companies were not engaged in manufacturing or production of articles or things has already ..... deprived of the benefit of investment allowance if they were engaged in the business of construction only and which may be available to industrial undertakings other than small scale industrial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 1992 (HC)

Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-11-1992

Reported in: (1993)113CTR(Bom)381; [1994]208ITR291(Bom)

..... split into two parts the first part dealing only with the business of construction irrespective of what the construction activity relates to and the second part should be confined to the ..... this clause artificially so as to make a bifurcation between the business of construction irrespective of what is constructed and the business of manufacture or production of articles or things specified in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 1992 (HC)

M/S. Trinmurthy Constructions Vs. Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi Gadgil

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-18-1992

Reported in: AIR1993AP95

..... submitted fresh application thereafter the plaintiff advertised in the news papers about the proposed construction of the residential complex and also invited applications for recruitment of staff required in ..... relied upon the two advertisements made in deccan chronical about the proposal of the construction of the residential complex on the suit schedule premises and inviting applications for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 1992 (HC)

Shri Mahalaxmi Construction Corporation and ors. Vs. Chief Engineer, Y ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-08-1992

Reported in: 1993(0)MPLJ295

..... of sindh phase ii of madikheda dam district shivpuri for that petitioner no 1 mahalaxmi construction corporation through one vijay choudhary a constituted attorney of the two partnership firms and chairman ..... suggestions made by the intending tenderers were supplied with the tender documents to petitioner mahalaxmi construction corporation thereafter it was for them to take a decision as the date and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 1992 (HC)

V.K. Constructions Works Ltd. Vs. the Bank of Rajasthen Ltd. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-1992

Reported in: II(1992)BC344; 48(1992)DLT468; 1992(23)DRJ371

..... and the arbitration clause is only contained in the underlying contract i e the construction agreement 15 regarding the first point counsel for the defendant submits that a contract ..... guarantee bank guarantee invocation thereof mobilization advance and performance guarantees six independent contracts for construction of dwelling units applications for grant of injunction under order 39 rules 1 and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 1992 (HC)

R.S. Avtar Singh and Co. Vs. National Projects Construction Corporatio ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-31-1992

Reported in: 47(1992)DLT599; 1992(23)DRJ184

..... the contract was entered into between the parties petitioner was to construct four godowns of total capacity of 19 580 metric tonnes with ..... the parties if the arbitrator takes a reasonable view on the construction of a clause the court will not interfere unless the ..... the basis of original drawings as well as the pace of construction even the respondent failed to extend the schedule period of completion .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1992 (HC)

Nangia Construction (India) Ltd. Vs. International Airport Authority o ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-21-1992

Reported in: 47(1992)DLT351; 1992(22)DRJ379; 1992RLR144

..... reproduced as under at the request of m s nangia constructions india pvt ltd the captioned guarantee is amended as under ..... a contract with indian airlines which included inter alia the construction and fabrication of aircraft testing centre engine repair centre in ..... 000 furnished for land on which labour huts had been constructed stipulation for removal on completion of project possession of land .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 1992 (HC)

H.U. Construction Company and anr. Vs. the State of Raj. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Sep-07-1992

Reported in: 1993(1)WLC280; 1992(2)WLN275

..... find no force in the writ petitions filed by h u construction company and rajasthan ministerial services association bearing s b civil writ ..... minor minerals concession rules 1986 rules 32 amp 34 auction neither construction company nor j nor g deposited earnest money rs 5 00 ..... lakhs held their offer is fictituous neither h u construction company nor shri jafarkhan and shri r c gupta have come .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Constructive - Judgment Search Results