Skip to content


Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 415 results (2.495 seconds)
1766

Taxier Vs. Sweet

Court : US Supreme Court

j 50 trover is never intended to recover the specific article it lies therefore for money not in a bag though bunb for the plaintiffs the admiralty has not the sole power of determining any injury whatever arising on the high sea common law maintain a constant controul over the courts of civil law jurisdiction they have obliged an ecclesiastical court to admit case of the wrong doer from the sentence of condemnation therefore to the sentence of reversal it is but one transaction

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1776

Wheeler Vs. Hughes

Court : US Supreme Court

parts of the statutes expressly refering to inland bills of exchange and making promissory notes negotiable as bills of exchange the which in the nature of things are not in his power that to say the assignee must make inquiry before he known to have used the language of the act of parliament would have been penning laws in a language not understood bills notes c a practice peculiar to this province and therefore most plainly demonstrating that this law made such a change

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1778

Respublica Vs. Carlisle

Court : US Supreme Court

with arms or ammunition provision or any other article or articles for their aid or comfort or by carrying on a and the united states of america into the hands and power of the king of great britian being a foreign enemy caution with respect to the allegata et probata in a civil cause ought a sortiori to be exercised in a capital impertinent to the overt act laid in the indictment and therefore not admissible 2 wils 148 9 it was urged that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1781

Respublica Vs. Chapman

Court : US Supreme Court

administered in pennsylvania antecedent to the establishment of the present constitution the powers of sovereignty were then lodged with congress under independence on the 4th july 1776 every state in the union was solemnly declared to be free and independent but even the executive council had sixteen or seventeen persons in their power who though not attainted were in circumstances similar to the council were appointed treason which is nothing more than a criminal attempt to destroy the existence of the government might certainly march 1777 the state was incapable of affording protection and therefore was not entitled to allegiance before that time on this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1781

The Resolution

Court : US Supreme Court

moreson then as well as kender mason had property on board moreson also mentions in his letter that afterwards there was it asked was it not subject to british capture the article it is said stipulates that the trade shall be carried here beyond a doubt comprehended for she was a belligerent power when the ordinance passed but it is said this ordinance that it is in the predicament of neutral property and therefore was not originally prize upon these facts and allegations two

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1781

The Resolution

Court : US Supreme Court

of kender mason if mason then had any property on board that property must have been in such parts of the against the captors but does not affect the claimants the articles of capitulation bind great britain france and america it is to dutch capture war prohibiting all commerce between the belligerent powers and not only liable to british and dutch capture but soon as information of the decree was received there has therefore been no laches page 2 u s 19 20 in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1782

MORRiS' LESSEE Vs. VANDEREN

Court : US Supreme Court

ld raym 311 bull nifi prius 229 290 3 blackst 368 2 wils 273 3 burr 1255 gilb l e 102 by mckean c f that the court has a discretionary power to admit circumstantial evidence of the existence of a record in the course of this cause that no act of parliament made in england previous to the settlement of the province have recourse to professional characters in matters of law and therefore the law protects the client against the danger and the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1782

Wilcox Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

as they did not want or take with them those articles which they might stand in need of these facts likewise all the rights and credits which the subjects of either power had against the other are revived for during the war the citizens of america whilst we by their acts of parliament are debarred of the like privilege it is hard that was paid nor any possession delivered of the salt if therefore it was not a compleat contract the salt was the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1784

Talbot Vs. Commanders and Owners of Three Brigs

Court : US Supreme Court

the completion and final ratification of the confederation it is constituted a court of appeals for reviewing re considering and correcting by enemies or certainly advised of an intended invasion by indians nor grant commissions to any ships or vessels of war arms powder ball two coils of cordage and some other articles they then put a person on board her as prize the court of the admiral hath no manner of conusance power or jurisdiction of any contract plea or quarrel or of trespass as this should refuse to take cognizance because the criminal taking was a capture as prize or under colour that conveniently at least not easily separated we will at present therefore pass so the second principal question reserving till that shall

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1784

Respublica Vs. Doan

Court : US Supreme Court

of attainder compatible with the letter and spirit of the constitution of this state which establishes with such strong sanctions the consequence which could not be as the king had the power to refuse page 1 u s 86 93 the writ on any other and what acts of assembly or of parliament second whether there have been any and what modern instances mansfield in wilkes s case expresses himself thus flight in criminal cases is itself a crime if an innocent man files is given by the coroner and is in these words therefore the said a b by the judgment of the coroner

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //