Skip to content


Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 118 results (2.567 seconds)
Jan 04 1963 (HC)

The State Vs. Bhimrao and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-04-1963

Reported in : AIR1963Mys239; 1963CriLJ293; (1963)1MysLJ148

attracted that is precisely what the courts below have held indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 90 so as to attract the article of limitation act therefore article 57 is not attracted and the suit is not barred judge bidar tinder section 438 of the code of criminal procedure recommending that the order passed by the munsiff magistrate in on 17 11 1961 is bad in law and has therefore to be set aside

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 1963 (HC)

P. Narasimha Iyengar Vs. Lakkanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-10-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Kant41; AIR1964Mys41; (1963)2MysLJ373

based upon a compromise between the parties it gave full scope to the parties to enter into any arrangements they possibly the provisions of section 47 of the code of civil procedure 4 i am supported in this view by a number to the conclusion that this appeal should fail it is therefore dismissed no costs 7 appeal dismissed s abdul nazeer j

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 1963 (HC)

Veerathaiah and anr. Vs. Ramaswamy Iyengar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-11-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Kant11; AIR1964Mys11; 1964CriLJ52; ILR1963KAR435; (1963)1MysLJ253

magistrate to answer the charge under section 352 of the indian penal code and the case was fixed for examination of withdrawal of warrant cases section 249 merely refers to the power of a magistrate of the first class or of any criminal trial which is governed by the code of criminal procedure containing no provisions for granting such permission can it be code and that the order of conviction and sentence should therefore be quashed section 265 of the code deals with the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 1963 (HC)

The State of Mysore Vs. Gowri Vithal Deshbhandari and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-11-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Kant113; AIR1964Mys113

later accidents from the actuarial tables for males for south india zone the expectation of life at the age of 34 the corporation has got exclusive power and any exercise of power by the state government would be without authority of law court of the civil judge senior division karwar in original civil suit number 139 1955 in which the respondents 1 to the death of deceased vithal and he died in 1956 therefore the 3rd defendant would have received the benefits for a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 1963 (HC)

G.K. Kumar Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-23-1963

Reported in : 1963CriLJ466

workman entitled to balance of gratuity appealed by employer appellate authority held that order does not call for interference writ petition by a court of law under the code of criminal procedure but in the ordinary sense of that expression namely that to the police station for necessary investigation 8 i am therefore of the view that the conviction of accused 3 cannot

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1963 (HC)

P.H. Alphonso Vs. C.F. De Costa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-25-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Kant187; AIR1964Mys187; (1963)1MysLJ596

the matter of judicial review under article 226 of the constitution of india the high court is empowered to consider the not all within the scope of section 263 of the indian succession act 1925 the learned district judge upheld the contention well settled that in the matter of judicial review under article 226 of the constitution of india the high court is which is made by an executor in exercise of the powers vested in him bylaw is voidable at the instance of is empowered to consider the correctness or otherwise of the procedure adopted by the officers of a public authority in arriving i e cannot be used by the grantee and has therefore become ineffective since the proper administration of the estate and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1963 (HC)

K.T. Venkata Gowda Vs. Devamma

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-25-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Kant40; AIR1964Mys40; (1963)1MysLJ582

13 appeal dismissed s abdul nazeer j code of civil procedure 1908 mdash order 23 rule 3 b representative suit mdash for sale in execution of her decree 12 this appeal therefore fails and is dismissed but since the respondent has not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1963 (HC)

The State of Mysore Vs. Seetharam

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-25-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Mys50; 1964CriLJ410; ILR1963KAR469; (1963)1MysLJ520

of session for an offence under section 302 of the indian penal code be quashed in consequence of the said order 438 read with sections 464 and 465 of he criminal procedure code it was alleged in that application that from the the accused can understand things etc is not known i therefore re quest that the question of getting expert medical opinion

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 1963 (HC)

The State Vs. Kampu Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-28-1963

Reported in : AIR1965Kant95; AIR1965Mys95; 1965CriLJ456; (1964)1MysLJ538

sections 341 of criminal procedure code and section 395 of indian penal code 1860 accused 16 charged for offence punishable under the provisions of this section the high court has wide powers to take such action and to give such directions as accused 16 cannot be made to understand proceedings of court procedure under section 341 to be followed in that case trial

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 1963 (HC)

K.T. Appanna Vs. Corporation of City of Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-29-1963

Reported in : AIR1963Kant338; (1963)1MysLJ571

fee for a licence under section 297 it should also constitute the source for the fixation of a fee for a indisputable that the corporation is the authority which has the power to fix a fee for the licence under section 297 clause of section 36 which was an exhaustive and complete code on the regulation and licensing of hotels also conferred power advance at the rate fixed by the corporation the position therefore is while the act requires a licence it does not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //