Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: delhi Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 168 results (1.049 seconds)Kishan Lal Vs. the State
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-26-1969
Reported in : 5(1969)DLT511
61 of the punjab excise act as extended to the union territory of delhi hereinafter referred to as the act 2 against the oft repeated charge against police officers of planting articles 8 the question is whether the association of jamil ahmad the provisions of section 103 of the code of criminal procedure did nto apply to the search of a motor car being briven by the petitioner and that the petitioner was thereforee in possession of the illicit liquor the learned magistrate rejected
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSumer Chand Vs. Sulekh Chand
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-17-1969
Reported in : 1970CriLJ1550; 6(1970)DLT149
and sulekh chand was challaned under section 506 of the indian penal code after recording the evidence the magistrate acquitted the chand was challaned under section 506 of the indian penal code after recording the evidence the magistrate acquitted the accused but called for in the circumstances of this case 4 i thereforee dismiss this revision petition ln his report to the police
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRatti Ram Tobacco Dealer Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors
Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-12-1969
Reported in : 1978(2)ELT505(Del)
the above subject and to say that the government of india had carefully considered your case while passing the revisional orders in view of the fact that there was no statutory power on the part of the revisional authority namely the central under section 35 and accordingly it cannto be regarded as procedure relating to appeal within section 12 of the central excises 5 1963 applying section 129 of the customs act is thereforee invalid 2 the petitioner s appeal in this case was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHafiz Zahir-ud-dIn Ahmad Vs. Shib Narain
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-21-1969
Reported in : ILR1970Delhi376
reasons given in the order that i am making in civil revision no 383 d of 1962 there is no substance there is no substance in this contention 10 the result thereforee is that this appeal is allowed the order dated april
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnique Motors and General Insurance Co. Vs. S.K. Vaiyapuri and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-23-1969
Reported in : AIR1970Delhi90; [1970]40CompCas1025(Delhi); 6(1970)DLT52
rule must be so read as to make it lawful constitutional and consistent with the smooth working of the system which any insurer has his principal place of business or domicile indian nationals are debarred from carrying on the business of insurance 3 read with rule 17 h is ultra virus of article 14 of the constitution as these provisions confer unbridled arbitrary extent a refinement of the broader doctrine of separation of powers the constant increase of social and economic regultion has necessitated is to operate or legislative control is retained by the parliament over the rule making power this sub section is an 64 t were inserted in the act by the insurance amendment act 1950 act xlvii of 1950 these sections were inserted procedures for cancellation of registration and that one of the procedures is more prejudicial than the other the question of any it would not be possible for the past years and thereforee the provisions for reviving the registration cannot ever apply to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.V. Puri Vs. Assistant Controller, Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi a ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-09-1969
Reported in : ILR1969Delhi898
on the ground that it contravened article 14 of the constitution referring to the preamble of the act which stated that a restriction being imposed to regulate travels involving trips outside india which invariably involved foreign exchange directly in some cases and assessment to tax according to his fancy and so contravened article 14 of the constitution rejecting this argument in m n cannto be said that there is abdication of the legislative power by the legislature 14 this is now settled law as rules made under this act was struck down because the parliament was found nto to have laid down any criteria or by a procedure established by law section 18b is that procedure established by law if it is otherwise valid as we any other provisions of the act in this regard and thereforee this section was void this obviously would be so in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.C. Sharma Vs. Union of India Through the Secy., Ministry of Health, ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-30-1969
Reported in : AIR1970Delhi1
powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 of the constitution the president promulgated the central health services rules 1963 constituting but the mother cancelled her tickets and remained behind in india the husband thereupon started procededings before the high court of to do so subject to superannuation this would show that article 311 was not attracted at all by the exclusion of called the rules of 1967 2 in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 of the constitution health service before the commencement of the central health services amendment rules 1966 continue to be a member of the service be removed from the said post except after following the procedure laid down under article 311 of the constitution and the petitioner thereforee requested me to leave them open they are thereforee left open 12 for the above reasons the writ petition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLabh Singh Atma Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-18-1969
Reported in : AIR1970Delhi171
made by the president under article 77 3 of the constitution of india the business of the government is unauthorized to more convenient transaction of the business of the government of india these rules are called the transation of business rules under of an opportunity of showing cause within the meaning of article 311 of the constitution the plea that the appellant was partem rule h the case involved the question of residuary power of central government the right to oral hearing was discretionary rule applicable to the case of the parties was the amended rule 30 which did no provide for partition of the house of lords held that the board having followed the procedure indicated by the rules framed under the statute in question of business to act for the government it is clear thereforee that the deputy secretary who rejected the petitioner s application
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabulal Amthalal Mehta Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-08-1969
Reported in : ILR1969Delhi860
on the ground that it offended article 14 of the constitution the decision in that case dated the 8th july 1957 the learned solicitor general on behalf of the union of india pointed out that the above said observation of the supreme customs act of 1878 on the ground that it offended article 14 of the constitution the decision in that case dated of any evidence or material in the possession of the authority so that he may examine accept or contradict the same 2 in 1961 if section 178a of the act as amended does nto govern the goods seized in this case there alteration in the substantive law and nto merely of a procedure even apart from this reasoning it is sufficient to note were smuggled goods in the very nature of this case thereforee this case has to be decided on the burden of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaymon Engineering Works Vs. the Union of India Through Ministry of In ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-24-1969
Reported in : ILR1969Delhi564
instant case petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying that this hon ble court be pleased difference between the actual price paid by the raymon company india private limited and the price for which it was sold of section 269 1 in the instant case petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying that in the sense that the central government can exercise this power only when it is required under any provision of the for the first time after the commencement of the companies amendment act 1960 65 of 1960 shall nto have any effect stood before the amendment in the year 1960 in a criminal matter there was a prosecution in respect of the accused promoter though made legally it was well within their power thereforee especially in the context of financial condition of the company
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT