Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: delhi Year: 1976 Page 1 of about 188 results (1.266 seconds)Pran Nath Lekhi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-16-1976
Reported in : AIR1977Delhi167; 1977CriLJ1130; ILR1977Delhi146B
determine the policy and to translate it into law the constitutionality of which is to be presumed unless there are strong declare that a grave emergency exists whereby the security of india is threatened by internal disturbance sd f a ahmed president mitter j in the privy purses case clause 5 of article 352 creates a specific and absolute bar in unambiguous language scheme of the constitution the relevant provisions thereof including article 368 are kept in mind there can be no difficulty in the proclamation the declaration was made in exercise of the powers conferred by clause 1 of article 352 of the constitution such proclamation is to be laid before each house of parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of two in specified fields there is no judicial review the 38th amendment thereforee does not mitigate against the scheme of our constitution been held was that article 368 related only to the procedure for amending the constitution but did not confer on the by resolutions of both the houses of parliament it follows thereforee the action of the executive in declaring an emergency under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Kumar Vs. the State
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-19-1976
Reported in : 1977CriLJ881
section 13 2 of the act the court had no jurisdiction under section 13 2 of the act to deal with not present today the order for sending the same is thereforee reserved till the next day of hearing 11 the aforequoted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer (Admn.) Range Iii and Company Circle Vii, New Delhi ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-24-1976
Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Del)0166B
in deciding this appeal this court can exercise all the powers that it would have if this was an appeal under if this was an appeal under the code of civil procedure the provision of order 41 rule 23 provide that when decided on a preliminary point by the official liquidator and thereforee the matter should be remanded back for a decision by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKali Ram(***) Vs. Ram Rattan
Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-26-1976
Reported in : 13(1977)DLT250
in section 44 was proved the court has no general power of dissolving partnerships and could not dissolve a partnership without mark in the manner prescribed by the code of civil procedure i think the court should insist on the proper proof not be dissolved and no decree could have been passed thereforee in no event can the judgments of the two courts
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-i, Central Revenue Building, New Del ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-30-1976
Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Del)165
to arise out of such a finding the tribunal was thereforee justified in dismissing the application filed by the revenue under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanhiya Lal Bansal Vs. Raj Nath Sharma and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-22-1976
Reported in : 14(1978)DLT69; 1978RLR294
from the tenant she had no intention of conveying her powers as guardian of the minor it has been found that open to one of the joint owners to waive notice thereforee the tenant cannot contend that the first notice ex aw5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSavitri Devi Abdali and ors. Vs. Ram Bhaj Datta
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-13-1976
Reported in : 12(1976)DLT334; 1976RLR138
the premises are situated was granted by the president of india for a period of 99 years commencing from 14th february smt bhagwanti devi it was held that the controller had jurisdiction to decide the existence of relationship of landlord and tenant not claiming any title in the property themselves again the civil court is not competent to determine the dispute between the so it has a very high probative value and has thereforee been properly relied upon by both the authorities below in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCapital Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Official Liquidator
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-1976
Reported in : [1978]48CompCas176(Delhi)
the public account of india in the reserve bank of india to the credit of the central government from out of before the amounts are disbursed to them the court has power under section 392 of the companies act 1956 to supervise amount was recovered from the debtors of the company and thereforee a scheme of arrangement was propounded by shri j n
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.N. Lekhi Etc. Vs. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi Etc.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-20-1976
Reported in : 1977CriLJ906; ILR1977Delhi6
the suspension of articles 19 21 and 22 of the constitution of india it was ruled that the petitioner had no of articles 19 21 and 22 of the constitution of india it was ruled that the petitioner had no locus standi dismissed in liminc the case involved a petition filed under article 226 of the constitution by a person detained under maintenance sampat v state 1969crilj1555 adetenu is not a convict the power to detain is not a power to punish the power and that scrutiny of the amended article disclosed that the parliamentb in using the same expression as were found in article compensation used in article 31 2 fell for consideration the amended article 31 2 by virtue of the fourth amendment act or when helikes but has to eat what the jail code provides for himand at the time when he is by normal vocation and is thus prevented fromsupporting his family detention thereforee would assume punitivenature it being not the objective of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.P. Dube Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-12-1976
Reported in : ILR1977Delhi79; 1976RLR595
section 61 and certain other orders section 78 provides forthe constitution of a tribunal to hear the appeals section 79 confersthe by this petition under article 226 of the constiution of india the petitioner who claims to be the secretary or thedelhi h l anand j 1 by this petition under article 226 of the constiution of india the petitioner who claims vested by rule 77 of the ruleswere in excess of powers inasmuch as rule 77 did not empowerthe registrar to make march 1975 the society electedsmt mukul bannerjee a member of parliament and prithvisingh gaur respondent no 3 as its president and 11 inter alia empowers the registrarto refuse to register the amendment of the bye laws but obliges himto communicato the order of the committee in certain circumstances and by a certain procedure as the impugned orders do not fall either in the the manner in which the registrar dealt withthese matters may thereforee appear to be both unreasonable and unfortunate it is not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT