Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 301 results (1.169 seconds)K. Raghavender Reddy and Others Vs. Government of A.P. and Others
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-08-2001
Reported in : 2001(3)ALD140; 2001(3)ALT504
..... to the provisions contained in article 368 of the constitution of india only the procedure prescribed therefor could be invoked for the purpose of amending the constitution and thus the purported amendment made by reason of ..... parliament as also of the people in the whole of india this honourable court has jurisdiction to deal with the matter by virtue of article 226 2 of the constitution of india .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.P. Transco Vs. Sri Gowri Sankar Cable Industries and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-22-2001
Reported in : 2002(3)ALT134
relation to entry 33 a of list iii of the constitution 63 in central bank of india v ravindra and ors the union list or the concurrent list see union of india v h s dhillon 1972 83itr582 sc s p mittal undertaking b make reservation of any article or class of articles for exclusive production by an ancillary or small scale industrial state and parliament have power to make laws the executive power of state shall be subject to limitation of the executive are being laid on the table of each house of parliament 52 reading the definition of industrial undertaking and small scale important to notice the statement of objects and reasons for amendment act 4 of 1984 which is in the following terms civil court the procedure provided under the code of civil procedure shall have to be followed whereas in the event the held bad in law section 6 2 of the act therefore in our opinion is not invalid in law w p
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-18-2001
Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)
also recommended modifications to the existing provisions relating to the constitution and functions of the board under clause c it recommended b f c a former member of law commission of india ministry of law and justice government of india now residing a photostat copy of the registered deed of memorandum and articles of association of sri srinivasa educational society kakinada the said be arrived at is that respondent no 2 with the power at his command wants to oppress the voice of the in mind that petitioner no 9 was a member of parliament when he was in the good books of his father on july 29 1993 in resolution no 6 resolved to amend article 13 of the articles of association enabling the company have powers of the court tinder the code of civil procedure not only in respect of matters specified in the present only 52 persons consented for filing of the applications and therefore the condition laid down in section 153c 3 a i
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. B. Srinivas Vs. Dr. P. Krishna Malakonda Reddy and Others
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-13-2001
Reported in : 2001(3)ALD490; 2001(3)ALT521
reason that an authoritative pronouncement has been made by a constitution bench of the supreme court with majority of 4 1 by the learned counsel appearing for the medical council of india 4th respondent herein 5 though dnb qualification has been declared legislation including that of invocation of its executive power under article 162 of constitution of india this was followed in ajay central government even after the amendments made in 1964 the power that is given to the council is the power to section 33 of the act the very object of the parliament in enacting section 33 is to channelise the framing of the indian medical council act 1933 and it underwent further amendments from time to time section 10a which has been incorporated significance that the university was entitled to adopt its own procedure and as the dnb was held to be equivalent to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Raghuram Babu Vs. Director General of Railway Protection Force, New ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-07-2001
Reported in : 2001(6)ALD18; 2001(5)ALT543
right to life as adumbrated under article 21 of the constitution of india it is thus one thing to say that must be taken to purposive interpretation in reserve bank of india v peerless company 1987 2scr1 it was held interpretation must approximates to an independent ground falling within the prohibition of article 14 of the constitution to enjoy a legislation put differently rationality we hold is a condition for valid exercise of power by the state 24 the right to equality includes the to engage a friend to defend his case 3 the parliament enacted the railway protection force act 1957 hereinafter referred to mandal praja parishad zilla praja parishad amendment act 1991 which amended sections 26 and 57 of the principal act virtually taking instant case the rule making authority while laying down the procedure for holding a departmental enquiry provided that the delinquent be kept appearing in section 34 are of general import necessarily therefore such wordsmust receive a general construction unless there is something
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Balaji and anr. Vs. Govt. of A.P., Panchayat Raj Dept. and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-23-2001
Reported in : 2002(3)ALT14
must be interpreted having regard to the intent of the constitution makers 40 the court it is well settled must ascertain schedule in terms of article 244 of the constitution of india as also act 40 of 1996 had been enacted cannot the scheduled areas as referred to in clause 1 of article 244 of the constitution 10 section 4 b c and particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power such regulations may a prohibit or restrict the transfer of to remedy secondly it was apparent that the draftsman and parliament had by inadvertence overlooked and so omitted to deal with f of article 371 f outside the limitations on the amending power itself the provisions according to the apex court must is not in accordance with the legislative purpose in the code called a purposive and strained construction 33 in dpp v the members of scheduled tribe only the writ petition is therefore allowed no costs 43 after the pronouncement of the judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Narender Goud and Others Vs. Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribubal ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-08-2001
Reported in : 2001(2)ALD537; 2001(2)ALT521
legislature or executive provided these authorities do not transgress their constitutional limits or statutory powers 15 in mallikarjuna rao s case of its power under article 309 of the constitution of india whenever such special rules come up for interpretation before a role over the rule making power of the executive under article 309 of the constitution 16 as indicated herein before in rules were framed by the state in exercise of its power under article 309 of the constitution of india whenever such to remedy secondly it was apparent that the draftsman and parliament had by inadvertence overlooked and so omitted to deal with whether the state government can be directed to frame or amend the existing statutory rules to alter the conditions of service to function and exercise their discretion by strictly following the procedure prescribed therein the functioning of democracy depends upon the strength the aforementioned service jurisprudence in a case of this nature therefore the doctrine of purposive interpretation should be invoked and in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohd. Abdul Subhan Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-01-2001
Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)507; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)297
except according to the procedure established by law is the constitutional mandate under article 21 the magistrate has no inherent power 209 of criminal procedure code 1978 and section 302 of indian penal code 1860 bail granted to respondents accused under section the procedure established by law is the constitutional mandate under article 21 the magistrate has no inherent power to remand the constitutional mandate under article 21 the magistrate has no inherent power to remand the accused to custody in the absence of my considered view is consistent with the intention of the parliament in bringing the amendment and scheme of the code as 1978 itself having regard to the object and reasons in amending clause a of section 209 of the code it was a of section 209 has been amended under the criminal procedure code amendment act 45 of 1978 the objects and reasons of police referred the case as one of civil nature therefore the complainant vidyasagar reddy filed a private complaint before the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Shyam Sunder Prasad and Others Vs. Commissioner, Mch, Hyd. and Oth ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-13-2001
Reported in : 2001(5)ALD851; 2001(6)ALT209
the word satisfied employed in article 356 1 of the constitution held the word satisfied has been defined in shorter oxford 3 of schedule vii with legislative entry at 42 of indian constitution the amending act 68 of 1984 being a later in the above decision interpreting the word satisfied employed in article 356 1 of the constitution held the word satisfied has the petitioners as a slum area in exercise of the powers under section 3 1 of the andhra pradesh slum improvement view of amending act 68 of 1984 enacted by the parliament incorporating some amendments into the land acquisition act 1894 ii act 68 of 1984 enacted by the parliament incorporating some amendments into the land acquisition act 1894 ii that under section of 1973 on the file of ii additional judge city civil court hyderabad and the same was decreed on 23 4 things indicating that the situation in question has arisen although therefore the sufficiency or otherwise of the material cannot be questioned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Devaiah Vs. Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-22-2001
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD408; 2002(1)ALT241
a larger bench findings 5 the matters relating to the constitution of the tribunal for the purpose of adjudication of disputes anr 1960 2scr331 t shepherd and anr v union of india andors 1988 illj162sc s r nayak j i have had to a tribunal constituted under the special constitutional dispensation qua article 323a and g whether the 1985 act is a complete firm opinion that where a statute gives a power such power implies that all legitimate steps may be taken to exercise i of viith schedule to the constitution of india the parliament has the legislative power to constitute tribunals for adjudication of analysis of the historical imperatives that have occasioned the constitutional amendment the 42nd b the incorporation of article 323 a and vis order xxi rule 92 of the code of civil procedure it held the settled principles of interpretation are that the of standards and have observed as follows one may expect therefore to find non legal specialist personnel on tribunal non legal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT