Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 131 results (0.997 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agro Insecticides and Allied Industries
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-24-1978
Reported in : [1981]127ITR796(AP)
also made to the judgment of the supreme court in indian overseas bank ltd v cit 1970 77itr512 sc in para to claim exemption before the aac which has the same powers as the original authority the revenue has therefore made an for the year were rs 3 639 the aac was therefore of the view that the assessee could have created development
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi. Navakoti Vs. the Regional Transport Officer, Nellore
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-16-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP11
dated 1 7 1967 notification i in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the andhra pradesh motor vehicles a p gazette dated the 27th march 1963 at subsequently amended the governor of andhra pradesh hereby directs that with effect on routes other than the one prescribed in the permit therefore we consider the contention raised in this regard is far
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Murthy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-29-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP85
s 6 to prefer an appeal to the appellate tribunal constitution of the tribunals and appellate tribunal consists of single member 19 19 1 31c 46 and 254 of constitution of india creditors challenged validity of different provisions of act petitioners contended of the act was to implement the policy enunciated in article 46 of the constitution 19 even going by the merits failure to produce the movable property the tribunal is given power to enforce such production by issuing necessary or orders 13 art 14 it is beyond the amending power of the parliament 18 in kesavananda v state of kerala air1973sc1461 the majority art 31 c as it is amended by the 42nd amendment sets at naught art 14 it is beyond the amending protection of the act section 14 bars the jurisdiction of civil court which are within the purview of the tribunals constituted the impugned act has received the assent of the president therefore in the state of andhra pradesh it prevails over the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakshminarayan Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-15-1978
Reported in : [1979]117ITR628(AP)
c j 1 this petition under art 226 of the constitution is filed by the assessee lakshminarayan questioning the validity of a is received or is deemed to be received in india in such year by or on behalf of such person 3a and 217 1a of income tax act 1961 and article 226 of constitution of india interest imposed on assessee for laid down in the act section 5 deals with the scope of total income section 5 to the extent relevant says without reference to and applications of the provisions of the amendment act 2005 undisputedly when the landlords filed their suits the on the date of its coming into force before the civil courts or appellate revisional or executing courts these cases are section 16 3 which corresponds to the present section 64 therefore that decision can have no application to the question involved
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. Leelavathamma Vs. the Regional Transport Officer, Nellore
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-22-1978
Reported in : AIR1978AP382
60 of motor vehicles act 1939 and article 226 of constitution of india whether finding of transport authority in proceeding under motor vehicles act 1939 and article 226 of constitution of india whether finding of transport authority in proceeding under section 60 act 1963 section 60 of motor vehicles act 1939 and article 226 of constitution of india whether finding of transport authority by analogy to the decisions of all tribunals which have jurisdiction whether by the law of this country or by the being used the remaining provisions of chap iv prescribe the procedure to be followed etc in granting permits s 60 deals already been exonerated in the proceedings under s 60 and therefore he was under no liability to pay difference of tax
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalari Nagabhushana Rao Vs. the Collector, Panchayat Wing, Guntur and ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-26-1978
Reported in : AIR1978AP444
andhra pradesh gram panchayats act 1964 and article 226 of constitution of india removal of sarpanch by collector challenged before state the supreme court in a k kraipak v union of india 1970 1scr457 relied upon by the learned government pleader in 50 4 of andhra pradesh gram panchayats act 1964 and article 226 of constitution of india removal of sarpanch by collector district collector or any other authority while exercising its appellate powers any consultation with or interference by the district collector or it is sufficient for our purpose to hold that the procedure adopted by the appellate authority herein is illegal apart from no prejudice that has been caused to the appellant and therefore the order is not violative of the principles of natural
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter Of: Veera Jiwatrum Chugani
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-04-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP144
court fees and suits valuation act 1956 article 265 of constitution of india and section 218 and 222 of succession act at the time of his death in another country the indian probate will not enable the executor to recover them although shall he calculated at the rate or rates specified in article 6 of schedule 1 article 6 of schedule i provides held that the assets obtained from england were within the jurisdiction of the high court of calcutta at the time of india and the question is answered accordingly 15 order accordingly civil court fees article 6 to section 53 of andhra pradesh follow the decision of the british indian court this judgment therefore clearly supports the contention of the petitioner that the court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSomasundarshan Goud Vs. the District Collector, Hyderabad and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-30-1978
Reported in : AIR1978AP420
114 of indian evidence act 1872 and article 226 of constitution of india proceedings initiated by collector of hyderabad at instance indian evidence act 1872 and article 226 of constitution of india proceedings initiated by collector of hyderabad at instance of collector act 1890 section 114 of indian evidence act 1872 and article 226 of constitution of india proceedings initiated by collector of 3 clearly lays down that the collector may delegate the power of signing the certificate to any officer and in this public officers other than the collector or by local authority therefore the collector of bombay is entitled to recover sums recoverable
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTirunuru Subbareddi and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-25-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP127
application by the petitioner landholders under art 226 of the constitution of india is to quash the acquisition proceedings relating to the provisions of art 254 2 of the constitution of india the state act shall prevail in the state of andhra the payment of rs 100 is colourable exercise of the power and the provisions of law are not complied with the sub sec 1 of section 6 of the act and therefore substituted provision as per c1 a of sub sec 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.V. Subba Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-25-1978
Reported in : AIR1978AP453
the circumstances without costs advocate s fee rs 150 constitution constitutional validity sections 9a 13 13 1 15 15 1 and 19 1 g 31 and 265 of the constitution of india and for the issuance of a consequential direction restraining the and development act 1957 and as well ultra vires of articles 14 19 1 f 19 1 g 31 and 265 seen it is stated in the counter affidavit that the power to levy dead rent is not traceable to sub section the insertion of section 9a into the principal act the parliament did not think it fit to relegate that to the was amended by the mines and minerals regulation and development amendment act 1972 by that amending act section 15 3 of which contemplate the issuance of notifications in accordance with the procedure ordained by the provisions specified supra in view of the employed in section 15 3 of the act what is therefore discernible from the comparison of both section 13 as well
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT