Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 208 results (1.063 seconds)Reepik Ravinder Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by Public Pros ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-07-1990
Reported in : 1991CriLJ595
be committed to prison further s 361 of the criminal procedure code mandates assigning special reasons by the court for not free society by mere infliction of punishment criminal law should therefore aim not merely at the detection trial and punishment of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Padmanabha Iyengar Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-16-1990
Reported in : AIR1990AP357
from carrying on its activities altogether art 26 of the constitution is relied upon as prohibiting such acquisition art 26 reads that according to the title deeds recognised by the british india government the entire tirumala hills is the property of t 2scr317 the following observations in the said judgment are relevant article 26 guarantees inter alia the right to own and acquire said acquisition notifications are an instance of colourable exercise of power alternatively it was argued that the petitioners ought to be that though there has been a certain defect in the procedure in conducting the enquiry under section 5 a it does and at the instruction of the owner the owner is therefore tortfeasor section 168 v gopala gowda jawad rahim jj insurers
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Ramesh Vs. the Special Officer and Competent Authority Urban Land C ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-28-1990
Reported in : AIR1990AP307
this act under clause 1 of art 252 of the constitution no person holding vacant land in excess of the ceiling and regulation act 1976 and article 226 of constitution of india land ceiling authority instructed not to register documents writ of 1 of urban land ceiling and regulation act 1976 and article 226 of constitution of india land ceiling authority instructed not order1 the petitioner holds a general power of attorney from one m krishna rao and others who the declarations are yet to be finalised under the act therefore placing reliance on the acknowledgments the petitioner cannot have the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Santosh 70 Mm Abids, Hyderabad, Rep. by Its Partner Mrs. Zameerun ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-20-1990
Reported in : AIR1991AP28
advocate s fee rs 150 in each 10 petitions allowed constitution rejection of application section 19 a of a p entertainment the commissioner of police the petitioner applied to the latter authority on 11 4 1990 on account of delay in the be expected from him for due com pliance with the procedure indicated in the g o the entertainment tax officer was indicated in the g o the entertainment tax officer was therefore not right in straightway rejecting the application on the ground
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVana Adamma and ors. Vs. District Collector and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-29-1990
Reported in : 1991(1)ALT478
legislature of the state 6 at the commencement of the constitution the land acquisition act 1894 act 1 of 1894 was appeal was dismissed 14 article 254 of the constitution of india provides for various situations in which a repugnancy may arise the supreme court examined the question of repugnancy contemplated by article 254 of the constitution of india in a batch of arise when both state and commonwealth seek to exercise their powers over the same subject matter victoria v commonwealth 1937 58 of the proviso to clause 2 of article 254 the parliament was free to make any amendment to the central law in article 246 of the constitution of india the state amendment was made with the assent of the president and parliament was a public servant within the meaning of the criminal procedure code and the repealed state act had not made any from the english cases as from the canadian cases seems therefore to be the same as that enunciated by isaacs j
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.M. Mujeeb Vs. Labour Court, Anantapur and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-12-1990
Reported in : [1991(61)FLR573]; (1990)IILLJ535AP; (1990)IILLJ535SC
thus the award is illegal and vitiated for want of jurisdiction so far as this contenction is concerned it is a labour court on the very same day without following the procedure laid down with regard to the enquiry and that the to be not an award in the eye of law therefore the award of the labour court in i d no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGolla Seetharamulu Vs. Golla Rathanamma and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-29-1990
Reported in : 1991CriLJ1533; II(1990)DMC257
and 399 cr p c the question of invoking the jurisdiction of this court again under s 482 cr p c petition filed under s 482 of the code of criminal procedure to quash the orders passed in cri revision petition no never cared to take the notice and reply to it therefore she filed a petition before the addl judicial first class
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModh. Maneef Vs. Mahendra Prasad and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-13-1990
Reported in : 1990CriLJ1878
and it is violative of art 22 5 of the constitution of india resulting in invalidation of the impugned order of was sent by speed post to the secretary government of india ministry of finance department of revenue new delhi the address 1989 passed by the first respondent in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under section 3 1 of the conservation foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act 1974 as amended hereinafter called the cofeposa act directing detention of the detenu of postal services andhra pradesh hyderabad referred to supra it therefore follows that without disposing of the representation made by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHussaIn Hassan Somali Vs. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-12-1990
Reported in : 1991CriLJ185
of violating the freedom guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution of india no doubt a simple intrusion but not invasion of the citizen under article 21 of the constitution of india 2 the facts of the case as stated in the right to personal liberty and freedom of movement guaranteed by articles 21 and 19 a d of the constitution therefore to to continue the history rowdy sheet for the petitioner the power or authority vested in the police to have surveillance against exercised shall not invade into the personal liberty of the criminal or rowdy for whom the rowdy sheet is opened or and continue the same unless substantial cogent material is available therefore for the opening as well as continuance of a rowdy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManagement of Oasis School Vs. Labour Court and V. Mukundan
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-15-1990
Reported in : (1992)ILLJ210AP
court in exercise of jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india in support of this proposition he relied on of india v n sundaramoney 1976 i llj 478 gamon india v niranjan das supra hari mohan rastogi v labour court award of the labour court in exercise of jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india in support of this managerial discretion cannot justify capricious or whimsical exercise of the power or retrenchment in the name of rationalisation this clearly emerges 12 per annum till the date of payment 22 i therefore dismiss writ petition no 17008 86 and allow writ petition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT