Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: allahabad Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (2.203 seconds)Santosh Kumar Sonkar and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-17-2001
Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1220; [2001(89)FLR846]; (2001)2UPLBEC1429
as to costs service writ of mandamus article 226 of constitution of india petitioners appointed as daily wagers by way of costs service writ of mandamus article 226 of constitution of india petitioners appointed as daily wagers by way of stop gap 14 no order as to costs service writ of mandamus article 226 of constitution of india petitioners appointed as daily wagers
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmulya Singh and Others Vs. Nagareeya Sahkari Bank Ltd., Varanasi and ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-25-2001
Reported in : 2001(3)AWC1746; (2001)2UPLBEC1285
undoubtedly state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution the reason could be many there may be majority shareholding in india shall open a new place of business outside india or change otherwise than within the same city town or are all co operative societies state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution the respondents submit that if this other co operative societies that it cannot do unless sovereign powers are conferred upon them but are all co operative societies into thinking that they merely applied the law made by parliament that their job was only to interpret law and not if a gap is disclosed the remedy lies in an amending act italics mine 39 the english courts have since then that is not a state is notmaintainable they opined thatcorrect procedure is to file arepresentation under section128 of the co operative
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnand NaraIn Singh Vs. U.P. Secondary Education Service, Selection Boa ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Feb-14-2001
Reported in : (2001)2UPLBEC959
all orders rules regulations and bye laws issued under this constitution or under any law made by parliament or the legislature ram ji prasad air 1990 sc 1300 iv union of india v sudhir kumar jaiswal 1994 4 scc 212 1994 27 me that this note is discriminator or ultra vires of articles 14 or 16 of the constitution the validity of the already been made in accordance with this act section 35 power to make rules the state government may by notification make issued under this constitution or under any law made by parliament or the legislature of a state shall be in the and heads appointed prior date of enforcement of the 1991 amendment act were regularised on fulfilling some conditions under sub sections as procedure for direct recruitment and prescribes for advertisement and procedure for allotting marks to the candidates 63 there is nothing professor of surgery professor of gynecology pertain to disciplines and therefore each is an isolated post italics mine p g chandigarh
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFederation of Indian Polytechnic Teachers Organisation Vs. Director, T ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-11-2001
Reported in : 2001LabIC3964; (2001)2UPLBEC1891
are void in view of article 254 1 of the constitution and a direction is liable to be issued to the being contrary to the norms and standards framed by all india council for technical education under section 10 1 i of the rules 1990 framed by state of u p under article 309 of the constitutionand regulation 1996 framed under adhiniyam 1962 detail that a i c t e is entrusted with power of laying down the norms and standards for courses curricula law on technical education is subject to power exercised by parliament under entry 66 of list i which is extracted below the parliament this was so even before the forty second amendment since entry ii of list ii even then was subject structure and fringe benefits poor promotional avenues and cumbersome recruitment procedures it recommended that it is necessary to overcome these draw no longer able to attract talented professionals to technical institutions therefore the meritorious professionals were turning away from the teaching profession
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGyan Singh Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Aligarh and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jul-26-2001
Reported in : II(2001)ACC740; 2001(4)AWC2638
it was held that article 19 1 g of the constitution of india guarantees to all citizens the right to practise the state under article 19 6 of the constitution of india and in that context the state can grant permit to operations in the road transport field it was held that article 19 1 g of the constitution of india guarantees to not bound to issue any mandamus in exercise of its power to issue a writ of mandamus under article 226 of under the new act it was observed as under the parliament in its wisdom has completely effaced the above features the the existing operators the supreme court took note of the amendments and held that the right to file objection has been of section 47 of the act reads as under 47 procedure of regional transport authority in considering application for stage carriage
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Dec-21-2001
Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562
territory of india into accord with the provisions of this constitution the president may by order make such adaptations and modifications in no manner alter amend or repeal the provisions of indian forest act 1927 the u p zamindari abolition and land the rights 23 reliance was further placed on provisions of article 246 3 of the constitution of india for the submission declaration of reserved forest the same will become beyond the power of the state to declare it reserved forest the provision forest produce entry in forest being in concurrent list both parliament and state legislature are competent to legislate several state amendments holdings act 1953 there will be any alteration repeal or amendment in the forest act the forest act 1927 was enacted not acted in conformity with the fundamental principles of judicial procedure u p consolidation of holdings act 1953 has been enacted provision of section 229b of the abolition act the petitioner therefore even if he is a bhumidhar cannot claim that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKirti Overseas and ors. Vs. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Nov-09-2001
Reported in : (2002)177CTR(All)427
appeal the present writ petition under article 226 of the constitution is not maintainable and the same is liable to be purchase limit of the same amount by union bank of india dayal bagh marg agra respondent no 4 and an agreement issued by the court in exercise of its power under article 226 of the constitution whether suo motu or otherwise whether provisions perhaps even within a reasonable time frame however the power of the court under article 226 must necessarily stop at recovery of the dues of banks and financial institutions the parliament has not only fixed a time schedule but also made justice and they shall have powers to regulate their own procedure chapter v deals with recovery of debt determined by tribunal also made a departure from the normal provision of cpc therefore the contention of the petitioners that provisions of income tax
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajvir Singh and Others Vs. Collector/District Magistrate, Muzaffarnag ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-30-2001
Reported in : 2001(1)AWC806
refuse to exercise its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india 7 our findings 7 1 perused the record exercise its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india 7 our findings 7 1 perused the record 7 2 circumstances this court should refuse to exercise its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india 7 our findings 7 the high court or court of session when exercising its power of revision 5 at the time of awarding compensation in code of criminal procedure as it stands by our state amendment reads as follows 357 order to pay compensation 1 when that under the relevant provisions of the code of criminal procedure it is only a judicial magistrate who is vested with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtique Ahmad Vs. Election Commission of India and Others
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-28-2001
Reported in : AIR2001All379
supreme court held that interms of article 243zg of the constitution there is complete and absolute bar in considering the matter process in this connection article 329 of the constitution of india may be taken note of which is set out herein power to interfere with the election process in this connection article 329 of the constitution of india may be taken note to file an election petition and the court has no power to interfere with the election process there will be no in any court b no election to either house of parliament or to the house or either house of the legislature be performed before the superintendent central jail naini allahabad and therefore it is not necessary that the petitioner should be sent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Feb-12-2001
Reported in : 2001CriLJ1765
will dilute the whole legal system the scheme of the constitution of india does not permit weakening of one of the the whole legal system the scheme of the constitution of india does not permit weakening of one of the wings of to time deem it necessary to appoint as provided in article 216 of the constitution of india he has further submitted notifications orders rules or bye laws is conferred then that power includes a power exercisable in the like manner and subject learned counsel for the c thereafter to rescind to add amend or vary such notification the state government will have to reached to adopt all possible measures to expedite the court procedures and to chalk out measures to avert all roadblocks causing it is at his instigation that the offence was committed therefore the appropriate section would be 109 and not 114 i
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT