Skip to content


Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: allahabad Year: 1955 Page 1 of about 224 results (1.141 seconds)
Apr 13 1955 (HC)

R.B. Lal Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-13-1955

Reported in : AIR1955All618; 1955CriLJ1443

for carrying railway earnings from the station to the imperial bank and also for collecting other income earned by the railway permit granted or countersigned by a regional or state transport authority authorising the use of the vehicle in that place in of goods for hire or reward sub section 2 is therefore not relevant to the determination of the question which we

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 1955 (HC)

Baqridan and ors. Vs. Bashir Ahmad Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-10-1955

Reported in : AIR1956All94

is conceded that no sanction was obtained from the central board and consequently the consent decree passed by the lower appellate dealt with appeals from decrees passed by courts exercising original jurisdiction that appeals from decrees passed by appellate courts were governed 108 and order 23 rule 3 of code of civil procedure 1951 when one of the plaintiffs claimed to be mutawalli contention and held that the appeal did not lie he therefore dismissed the appeal but granted leave to file an appeal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 05 1955 (HC)

Sia Ram Vs. Radhey Shiam

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-05-1955

Reported in : AIR1956All332

had to admit that the finding returned by the learned civil judge cannot be attacked 3 this being protected land and in any case the sale deed cannot be set aside therefore for the reasons given i uphold the operative part of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 1955 (HC)

Lajja Ram Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-22-1955

Reported in : AIR1955All671; 1955CriLJ1547

some other connection criminal holding identification parade section 9 of indian evidence act 1872 application made before magistrate for conducting identification no doubt that the holding of identification parade is a procedure not prescribed by any law but one which can be days before he was produced before the magistrate there was therefore ample time for the prosecution to have puthim up for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 1955 (HC)

State Vs. Beni Bahadur Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-11-1955

Reported in : 1957CriLJ268

magistrate of deoria who did not belong either to the indian civil service or of the united provinces civil service in act provides that the authority appointed shall have all the powers of a civil court under the code of civil procedure to be a civil court under the code of civil procedure for other purposes or a criminal court under the code within the meaning of section 15 of the act and therefore was not eligible to apply to the district magistrate for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 25 1955 (HC)

State Vs. Sheo Shanker

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-1955

Reported in : AIR1956All326; 1956CriLJ659

words in the section which is beyond the court s jurisdiction the intention of the legislature obviously is not to release be inflicted by courts are mentioned in section 53 penal code death is one punishment and transportation another but there is to jail but he must be sentenced to imprisonment we therefore sentence him to imprisonment till the rising of the court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1955 (HC)

Gaya Deen Vs. Mst. Amrauti

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-04-1955

Reported in : AIR1955All630

final disposal property adverse possession sections 101 to 103 of indian evidence act 1872 onus of proving adverse possession and presumption does not appear to their lordships to be supported by authority nor is it tenable unless it were clearly shown that surviving coparcener smt newasi s possession of the property would therefore be adverse unless it was shown that she held it

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 1955 (HC)

President, Municipal Board Shahjahanpur, Through Bishan Chandra Vs. Di ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-17-1955

Reported in : AIR1956All369

of u p municipalities act 1916 and article 226 of constitution of india have no authority to regulate the conduct of p municipalities act 1916 and article 226 of constitution of india have no authority to regulate the conduct of the meeting incorrect on these facts the petitioner filed a petition under article 226 of the constitution on 4 5 1955 praying that or for any other purpose it does not limit the powers of this court to be exercised only when final orders 2 claimed by him the u p municipalities act was amended by u p act 7 of 1953 section 48 which is sufficiently probable and not too distant and if the procedure by which that ultimate action may be questioned is too him to give any explanation of such charges the conduct therefore on account of which it is proposed to take action

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 1955 (HC)

Vimal Kishore Mehrotra Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-1955

Reported in : AIR1956All56; 1956CriLJ13

dispute to publicize the facts of the dispute violates the constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and of the press this 1932 and article 22 1 226 of the constitution of india section 7 prohibits several acts in certain cases it may governed by clause 1 and not by clause 5 of article 22 however under both the clauses certain information has to unlawful possession under the liverpool corporation act he had no power to arrest him without a warrant under that act so unconstitutional 5 sub section 1 of section 7 criminal law amendment act 23 of 1932 runs thus whoever a with intent unconstitutional but as already observed the operation of section 7 criminal law amendment act is not confined to peaceful picketing 8 332 h frankfurter j observed at page 343 experience has therefore counselled that safeguards must be provided against the dangers of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1955 (HC)

Waqf Estate of Nawab Mohd. Azmat Ali Khan Vs. U.P. State and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-07-1955

Reported in : AIR1956All416

of refugees act 1948 included in ninth schedule of the constitution by fourth constitutional amendment outcome by virtue of provisions of refugees act 1948 and article 31 b of constitution of india u p land acquisition rehabilitation of refugees act 1948 included the result therefore is that by virtue of provisions of article 31b this act should be deemed to be valid and contrary each of the said acts shall subject to the power of any competent legislature to repeal or amend it continue included in ninth schedule of the constitution by fourth constitutional amendment outcome by virtue of provisions of article 31 b declares j 1 this is a reference by the learned additional civil judge of muzaffarnagar under section 113 civil p c a in the 9th schedule of the constitution 3 the result therefore is that by virtue of provisions of article 31b this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //