Confiner - Judgment Search Results
Raju (Now Confined in Central Jail) Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-1985
Reported in: 29(1986)DLT286
Malik Sharief-ud-Din, J.1. One Mohan Lal, brother of the appellant and the appellant were tried by Additional Sessions Judge Delhi for an offence under Section 302 aided with Section 34 IPC and by his order dated...
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay-i Vs. Confinance Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-29-1972
Reported in: [1973]89ITR292(Bom)
Kantawala, J. 1. The questions of law in this reference are as under : 'Whether, having regard to the admitted fact that the assessee's method of accounting was mercantile, the interests of Rs. 9,275 for the...
Kanta Prasad (Presently Confined in Jail) vs.the State Gnctd of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h November, 2017 CRL.A. 1359/2015 KANTA PRASAD (PRESENTLY CONFINED IN JAIL) Through: Mr. K.Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GNCTD OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“petitioner Seeks Concession of Pre-arrest Bail in a Case Registered ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
CRM not M-21741 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-21741 of 2012 Date of Decision:-21.8.2013 Barinder Kumar Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER...
“petitioner Seeks the Concession of Pre-arrest Bail in a Case Regist ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
Crl. Misc. not M-15933 of 2013 (O&M) & -1- Crl. Misc. not M-17716 of 2013 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Crl. Misc. not M-15933 of 2013 (O&M) Gurkirpal Singh...
“petitioner Seeks the Concession of Pre-arrest Bail in a Private Com ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
CRM not M-13869 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-13869 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 22.08.2013 Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner Versus Lakhbir Singh .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE...
“counsel for the Petitioner Contends That Relief of Pre-arrest Bail ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
CRM No.M-7032 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-7032 of 2014 Date of Decision:-22.4.2014 Sunder Singh alias Raju ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER...
“The Petitioners Seek the Concession of Pre-arrest Vs. State of Hary ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-7601 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2014. Sneh Verma & another --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
The Petitioner Seeks the Concession of Pre-arrest Bail in Vs. Unknown
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M38347of 2013 Date of decision: 6.5.2014 Kanwal Mohini .petitioner vs State Bank of Patiala and anr ..respondent Present Mr.SK Bawa, Advocate. Mr.DK...
The Petitioner Seeks the Concession of Pre-arrest Bail in a Case Vs. S ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M27227of 2013 Date of decision:- 6.5.2014 Vikas Malhotra Petitioner versus State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr.Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate. Mr.CS Brar, DAG, Punjab...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free