Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: karnataka Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.016 seconds)Voltas Ltd. Vs. B.J.N. Hotel Ltd.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-05-2003
Reported in : II(2005)BC219; [2004]122CompCas928(Kar)
is unable to pay the debts 2 the respondent after service of notice entered appearance and filed detailed statement of objections is accordingly rejected karnataka public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 k a no 32 1974 sections 2 g 4 accordingly rejected karnataka public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 k a no 32 1974 sections 2 g 4 h
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-06-2003
Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678
own limitations as a judge and from those limitations i generalize to the inherent limitations of all appellate courts reviewing rate be said that the board the company is performing the duties entrusted to it took assistance of the contractor taking of out of works by any authority in exercise of its powers under any law for the time being in force 51 1885 to supply energy to the public subject to such conditions and restrictions if any the central government or state government 3 of the supply act suffice it to state that service line commences only after stepping down from 66 kv to of the board the board is required to take prompt action to supply adequate electricity to the intended consumers as soon electricity supply corporation v commissioner of wealth tax west bengal 1971 82itr154 sc and the upper ganges valley electricity supply co
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.V. Suresha Vs. Zilla Panchayat by Its Chief Executive Officer and or ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-10-2003
Reported in : ILR2003KAR4794; 2004(1)KarLJ305
room for complaints from the villagers or in discharging his duties therefore the impugned resolution passed by the second respondent is act no 14 of 1993 zilla panchayat and gram panchayat powers of in respect of termination and appointment of persons to condition of furnishing bank guarantee for the value imposing such condition is also in terms of the statutory provisions though the resolution dated 31st july 2001 vide annexure c terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground that he is not view of non compliance of the mandatory provisions of the act and the rules 6 having regard to the facts and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEngee Industrial Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-26-2003
Reported in : 2002LC531(Karnataka); 2004(164)ELT242(Kar)
for the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in general be they penal or beneficial restrictive or enlarging of the the term merged duty denotes the merger of the two duties leviable on the product imported under sections 2 and 3 1 3 1986 reads as follows in exercise of the powers conferred by sub rule 1 of rule 8 of the purposes of the act but in that case the three conditions that must be fulfilled in order to justify this course the threshold between the usual import of a vessel for servicing and the import of a vessel for the purpose of the act penalty can follow only after determination of the actual liability for payment of market fee and not even before it kammins ballrooms co ltd v zenith investments torquay ltd 1971 ac 850 provides in instance of this but in that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDattaprasad Co-operative Housing Society Limited and ors. Vs. State of ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-17-2003
Reported in : ILR2004KAR1892; 2004(3)KarLJ310
three judges speaking through chinnappa reddy j observed the maxim generalia specialibus non derogant is quite well known the rule flowing of wills the effects of registration and non registration the duties and powers of registering officers refusal to register the fees the effects of registration and non registration the duties and powers of registering officers refusal to register the fees for registration a special act dealing with a specific subject namely with conditions of service enumerated in the schedule or workmen in industrial act dealing with a specific subject namely with conditions of service enumerated in the schedule or workmen in industrial establishments it the provisions of section 17 b and c of central act 14 of 1908 and article 20 1 2 of karnataka the public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 40 of 1971 and the bombay rent control act delhi rent control act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. K. Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-10-2003
Reported in : ILR2003KAR2177
before and without any break in service or change in duties and responsibilities of the positions in which they were working statutory in character because they are enacted in exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 and clause 5 b above the rule of course would have governed the conditions of service of the respondents had their reemployment service not of the government order dated 297 30 1 1976 the service of the petitioners in the university will be treated as under sub section 2 of section 7 of the uas act their conditions of service were protected under section 32 2 constitution bench in deoki nandan prasad v state of bihar 1971 illj557sc wherein this court authoritatively ruled that pension is a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhl Worldwide Express (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Airfreight Employees Union, Re ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-11-2003
Reported in : [2004(101)FLR399]; ILR2004KAR1307
dispute between the parties therefore it is implicit under the powers provided he must follow the principles of natural justice in the same section 33 of the act deals with the conditions of service etc of the workmen section 33 3 4 workmen in proportion to their membership impugned order quashed labour services appointment h v g ramesh j petitioner secured appointment on trade union connected with an industrial establishment to which the act applies shall communicate to the employer before the 30th april
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGolden Colour Lab and Studio and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Commerci ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-30-2003
Reported in : ILR2003KAR4883; [2003]134STC570(Kar)
the definition of the word sale in the m p general sales tax act 1958 after its amendment consequent to the bombay v narottamdas 1951 2scr51 stated that the jurisdiction and powers of the high courts are not dealt with in entry works contract where there was a supply of materials and services in an indivisible contract but there the question had arisen the supreme court declaring specifically that section 31 of krc act was valid or holding that the law declared in padmanabha law dictionary in madhava rao scindia v union of india 1971 3scr9 the supreme court observed that it is difficult to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.A. Babu Jayaprakash Vs. the Managing Director, Karnataka Soaps and D ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-07-2003
Reported in : [2003(97)FLR293]; 2003(1)KarLJ541; (2003)IILLJ884Kant
not an incidental power under the constitution the government has general authority to raise revenue and choose the methods of doing to continue to be unfit for the discharge of his duties the corporation could also without any previous notice dismiss either challenge to held power to tax is not an incidental power under the constitution the government has general authority to raise to payment of lease rent and supervision charges amongst other conditions such as payment of royalty forest development tax and other respondent company to resort to a method of terminating the services of the petitioner even assuming that the petitioner did not company being an instrumentality of the state in all its actions it is expected to act in a fair and reasonable
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBangalore Development Authority Vs. P. Anjanappa (Deceased) by L.Rs
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-07-2003
Reported in : ILR2003KAR1471; 2003(2)KarLJ250
this court and therefore review petitioner cannot invoke the inherent powers of this court to review the earlier order passed lastly of the exemption provided in section 3 2 of the act in that the division bench was pleased to hold that exemption under section 3 2 of the act 26 of 1971 did clearly amount to an error apparent on the face
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT