Competitive - Judgment Search Results

Competition Commission of India Vs. Co-Ordination Committee of Artists ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

dominant position and regulation of combinations'. It comprises of Sections 3 to 6. Section 3 deals with anti- competitive agreements and Section 4 prohibits the abuse of dominant position. Section 5, on the other hand, takes care

Competition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.13578 OF 2015 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THOMAS COOK (INDIA) LTD. & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E

Competition Commission Of India Vs. State Of Mizoram

Court: Supreme Court of India

…Appellant Versus STATE OF MIZORAM & ORS. …Respondents. JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.Facts:1. A complaint received by the Competition Commission of India (for short ‘appellant/CCI’) from respondent No.4 seeking investigation under the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

of resources is determined solely by supply and demand. The rationale of free market economy is that the competitive offers of different suppliers allow the buyers to make the best purchase. The motivation of each participant in

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7152014 Pronounced on:02. 12.2014 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Mr.

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7152014 Pronounced on:02. 12.2014 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Mr.

Competition Commission of India and Anr vs.oriental Rubber Industries ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 12.2017 Pronounced on:24. 05.2018 LPA6072016, C.M. APPL.41020/2016 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.…. Appellants Through: Sh. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Balaji Subramanian, Sh. Udayan

Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

DG was to investigate violations of Section 3(3) (a), (b) and (c) of the Act, pertaining to anti- competitive agreements, by manufacturers of Man Made Fibre („MMF‟), including GIL, the DG could not have investigated into any

Competition Printing Press Vs. Jaiprakash Singh and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2001(89)FLR809]; (2001)IILLJ1341Bom

R.J. Kochar, J.1. It is the case of the Respondent workman, who indeed was not at all interested in reinstatement but still continued to carry on this extremely vexatious litigation obviously to extract or knock out...

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

publication--'Competition Success Review' -- under the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867. The petitioner's said publication i.e.. Competition Success Review (English monthly) is also registered with the Department of Posts, Office of the Chief Post Master