Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 22d officers and other staff of authority Page 6 of about 119 results (0.151 seconds)

Kairali Marketing and Processing Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Pullengadi Se ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : II(2007)BC520; 2007(1)KLT287

..... the bank cannot be held to be in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its affairs on the date when the offence was committed. therefore the signatory/the then secretary cannot be prosecuted under section 138 read with section 141 of the n.i. act. the petitioners herein can hence claim no benefit or advantage on account of ..... the conduct of the complainant not prosecuting the then secretary/signatory of the cheque. the challenge raised on this ground must hence fail.26. if the signatory/then secretary is not the person in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its .....

V. Selvaraj Vs. Mylapore Hindu Permanent Fund Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1968Mad378

..... the meeting specifically convened for electing directors, except under the provisions of section 256 of the companies act. he denies what all has been said by the secretary in his counter-affidavit and alleges that the registrar of companies rejected the request of the petitioner for extension of time for holding the 94th annual general body ..... meeting. he, therefore, presses that respondents 2 to 5 who are deemed to have ceased to hold the office of directorship, should be restrained from acting ..... at the gokhale hall on 22-4-1967. in this counter-affidavit, the allegations already traversed in company application no. 124 of 1967 are reiterated and the allegations made in the affidavit of the secretary of the fund in support of this application are expressly denied. the deponent of this affidavit states that .....

Peirce Leslie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Miss Violet Ouchterlony Wapshare and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC843; [1969]39CompCas808(SC); [1969]3SCR203

..... trust had the fullest information upon all material facts, and that having this information he agreed to and adopted what was done.'5. the appellant-company was the secretary of the old company, was in charge of its correspondence and accounts and was actively engaged in assisting it and its shareholders in selling the estates. in the course ..... the government of india act, 1915, provided that the revenues of india received for his majesty ..... belong to the east india company in trust for her majesty for the service of the government of india.'13. by section 54 of the government of india act, 1858, the existing provision was continued in force and was construed as referring to the secretary of state in council in place of the company. section 20(3)(iii) of .....

Harshendra Kumar D Vs. Rebatilata Koley Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2011SC1090

..... fact that the dishonoured cheque was signed by him on behalf of the company, would give rise to responsibility under sub-section (2) of section 141. (iii) in the case of a director, secretary or manager as defined in section 2(24) of the companies act or a person referred to in clauses (e) and (f) of section ..... containing the particulars specified in the register. any change among its directors, managing directors, managers or secretaries specifying the date of change is also required to be furnished ..... a register of its directors, managing director, manager and secretary containing the particulars with respect to each of them as set out in clauses (a) to (e) of sub-section (1) of section 303 of the companies act, 1956. sub-section (2) of section 303 mandates every company to send to the registrar a return in duplicate .....

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Yadavgir Dharamgir

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1936Bom19; (1935)37BOMLR931; 160Ind.Cas.505

..... as are not charged with functions which are in themselves the acts or the attributes of sovereignty. as the secretary of state for india in council is now liable to the same extent as the east india company was, it seems to me to be extremely probable that the secretary of state would be bound by his contracts with private individuals, ..... mr. justice tyabji seem to have been partly based on an alleged distinction between the crown as representing the east india company and the crown in its ordinary capacity. but in the case of denning v. the secretary of state there is a. discussion of the relevant statutes which seems to indicate that no such distinction could properly be made ..... the courts ; and he urges that the dismissal of a servant whose duties are in no way duties of state is not an act of state. in the case of jehangir m. cursetji v. secretary of state this aspect of the question was touched upon by the learned judge who decided it. but the discussion was not strictly necessary .....

Akhil Sibal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1995Delhi480

..... in this writ petition namely; what does 'declaration shall be made' means as used under section 6(1) of the act. would it mean, that the (declaration is made on the date it is signed by a secretary to such government or of some officer duly authorised to certify it or on the date it is published in the official ..... . najundappa v. state of karnataka : air1976kant40 , khadim hussain v. state of u.p. : [1976]3scr1 , dr. chura mani v. state of himachal pradesh & ors. air 1975 hp 19, asia tobacco company ltd. v. union of india & ors. : [1985]155itr568(mad) , smt. shakuntala b. moda v. union of india & ors. 21 (1991) dnj 214, universal cans & containers . ltd. 1992 (40) ..... (1) whenever it appears to the [appropriate government] that land in any locality [is needed or] is likely to be needed for any public purpose for for a company], a notification to that effect shall be published in the official gazette [and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the .....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Madras and Southern Maharashtra ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1940]8ITR280(Mad)

..... profits within the prohibition of deduction from the profits in section 53 (2) of the finance act, 1920. rowlatt, j., put the question this way :-'are the profits of the company for the purpose of corporation profits tax the amount of their share before the secretary of state is recouped, or are they only the balance which is left to them after the ..... the commissioner of income-tax, in agreement with the company, has referred to this court under the provisions of section 66 (1) of the indian income-tax act, 1922, the following question :-'whether the said sum of rs. 23,33,333 being the equivalent in rupees of the guaranteed interest paid by the secretary of state for india under the terms of the .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Madras and Southern Mahratta Railway Co ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1940)2MLJ110

..... corporation profits tax the amount of their share before the secretary of state is recouped, or are they only the balance which is left to them ..... of income-tax, in agreement with the company, has referred to this court under the provisions of section 66(1) of the indian income-tax act, 1922, the following question:whether the said sum of rs. 23,33,333 being the equivalent in rupees of the guaranteed interest paid by the secretary of state for india under the terms of ..... state formed part of the company's profits and that the recoupment to the secretary of state out of the surplus profits represented a distribution of profits within the prohibition of deduction from profits in section 53(2) of the finance act, 1920, rowlatt, j., put the question this way:are the profits of the company for the purpose of .....

Nelson Vs. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the place limits of the general route of the road, and in which a withdrawal had been ordered in accordance with the provisions of the act making the grant, secretary smith, sustaining the title of the railroad company, said (p. 103): "i am clearly of the opinion that, after the withdrawal made upon the map of general route, no ..... title when obtained, to indians twenty-one years of age, or the head of a family having abandoned the tribal relations. secretary noble said: "the provisions of this act were in force at the date when the company's rights attached on definite location of its road, and, if the matters alleged relative to the claim of the indian enoch ..... only. this withdrawal takes effect from august 15, 1873, the date when the map was filed by the company with the secretary of the interior, as required by the sixth section of the act of july 1, 1864, organizing said company." the letter of the commissioner and the diagram therein referred to were received and filed in the local land .....

In Re: U.P. Cement Corporation Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas562(All)

..... of 2000 filed by cement workers union and others against winding up order was dismissed on 31-7-2000. 8. the statement of affairs of the company in pursuance of section 454 of the companies act, 1956, on form 157 verified by sri yashpal sharma, the company secretary on 6-3-2000, was submitted to official liquidator with a copy to the registrar of the ..... the lead bank by way of equitable mortgage. a declaration and undertakingdated 8-5-1994 has also been given by the company regarding joint mortgage. the government of u.p. guaranteed the above loan by its letter dated 22-10-1980 and 23-12-1991 and also executed guaranteed agreement dated 23-12-1991. to secure credit facilities towards the working capital .....