Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 22d officers and other staff of authority Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 1 results (0.099 seconds)

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]50SCL171(HP)

..... ) the managing director or managing directors; (b) the whole time director or whole time directors; (c) the manager; (d) the secretary; (e) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the board of directors of the company is accustomed to act; (f) any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with that provision: provided that the person so charged ..... the aforesaid definition of 'officer who is in default' that the managing director(s), if any, whole time directors, if any, manager, if any, secretary, if any, any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions, the board of directors of the company are accustomed to act, any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with the provisions of the .....

Vijay Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]118CompCas604(HP)

..... ) the managing director or managing directors ;(b) the whole-time director or whole-time directors ;(c) the manager;(d) the secretary ;(e) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the board of directors of the company is accustomed to act;(f) any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with that provision :provided that the person so charged ..... the aforesaid definition of 'officer who is in default' that the managing director(s), if any, whole-time directors, if any, manager, if any, secretary, if any, any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions, the board of directors of the company are accustomed to act, any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with the provisions of the .....

Reliance Infrastructure Limited Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... and stated that since it was required to incorporate a special purpose vehicle (spv) having its head office in himachal pradesh, duly registered under the companies act, 1956, for implementation of the project it was working towards setting up such a corporation in cyprus/mauritius. with regard to payment of upfront ..... powari power project, it was decided to set up a committee under the chairmanship of chief secretary with following as members.1. principal secretary (industry)2. principal secretary to chief minister3. principal secretary (power)4. principal secretary (finance) and5. secretary (law).the committee will come up with a proposal so as to decide this issue on ..... for financial strength. however, the financial strength criteria was evaluated based upon a somewhat vague intent of such participation by standard bank. the committee of secretaries viewed this as an infirmity in the evaluation process.7. however, after going through the relevant record it also came to the notice of the .....

In Re: Gontermann-piepers (India) Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2005]57SCL225(HP)

..... companies act arc required to disclose their interests direct or indirect in the scheme of arrangement. the statutory provisions have not been complied with and the proposed arrangement is such that the relevant factors have remained unnoticed and the proposed arrangement lacks bona fides.8. in reply to the objections, sh. rajesh gupta, company secretary ..... and senior manager (accounts) of the ist petitioner-company has stated that sbi being the objector has provided the financial assistance to the ist petitioner-company against its textile project only. none of the financial assistance provided by the sbi ..... sica was raised before the learned single judge of the karnataka high court during the pendency of the proceedings under sections 391 to 394 of the companies act and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned single judge had approved the scheme of arrangement. the ratio of the case of .....

Sirmur Chemical and General Industries Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... predecessor directed that the hearing of this appeal should be postponed till the proceedings in the connected civil miscellaneous petition no. 6 of 1951, under section 162 of the indian companies act, 1913, were completed and that case became ripe for arguments. (5) recording of the evidence in c. m. p. 6 of 1951, took a long time due to ..... sirmur chemical and general industries ltd. (which will be referred to hereafter as the "(company)" informing it that the licence granted to it on 30-6-1945 a. d. had been revoked under para ..... on 30-6-1945 and 18-9-1945, to the company. the company started work on 5-4-1946 a. d. under its articles of association. on 15-4-1948 a. d., sirmur state merged in the indian union. on 10th baisakh, 2005-b. (corresponding to 22-4-1948 a. d.), the secretary, sirmur government , wrote to the managing agent of .....

Chamba Valley Transport Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1953HP8

..... state and began to run vehicles of their own. after several unsuccessful demands, the last dated 8-11-1950, when representatives of the company are alleged to have waited on the development secretary, the present petition was filed on 1-12-1950.4. basing its title on the contract with the respondent's predecessor, the state of ..... bannikhet road), the transferee (the respondent) is not, as such, bound by the licence (the 5-year permits), under section 59 of the easements act, 1882; that the petitioner company having already sold its vehicles to the respondent, it was not entitled to ply transport on unexpired permits relating to those vehicles; and that the permits have ..... to nationalise transport. now, prior to the amendment, amongst others, of the restriction clause (6) of article 19 by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951, it would have been within the scope of judicial review as to whether a restriction on the exercise of the fundamental right of carrying on a trade or .....

Siri Ram and anr. Vs. Niranjan Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962HP52

..... record and it appears therefrom that the company was registered as a private company tinder the companies act. the authorized capital of the company was rs. one crore divided into 10,000 shares of rs. 1000/- each. the subscribers to the memorandum of association were (1). c.c. desai, secretary to the government of india, ministry of ..... production, for and on behalf of the president of india, (2) c.c. desai, secretary ..... thousand each. the president of india was allotted 2,99,999 shares and the secretary of the production ministry, was allotted one share. after the company was constituted the assets of the fertiliser project were transferred to the said company with effect from 15-11-59. subodh ranjan ghosh was discharged from his services .....

Eicher Limited Through Bimal Sachdeva Vs. Himachal Pradesh Housing Boa ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002HP135

..... on april 17, 2000 ex parte ad-interim relief was granted to the plaintiff-appellant and the operation of the impugned order of the executive officer-cum-secretary, housing board, nigam vihar, shimla dated february 10,2000 was stayed till further orders subject to the plaintiff/applicantdepositing rupees 28.58 lacs, the amount ..... to the plaintiff, are illegal and unwarranted. plaintiff replied to the notices reiterating its stand but without any success. plaintiff sent a representation to the chief secretary to the government of himachal pradesh requesting for the directions of the government to the defendant-board to withdraw the two notices demanding unearned increase. plaintiff brought ..... , inter alia :(a) the suit is not maintainable ; (b) the suit is barred under the provisions of the h.p. land revenue act; (c) as the plaintiff company has failed to pay the amount determined by the chief executive officer, therefore, the defendant board is within its right to direct the cancellation of .....

Shobit Construction and anr. Etc. Vs. T.K. International Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2006HP4,2006(1)ARBLR510(HP)

..... by the registrar of the civil court at khurd at bhubaneshwar. summons were also served on the defendant-company on december 2, 2003 at their gurgaon address which were received by one satya pal singh at. the instance of its secretary mr. pardeep. summons were also served on the defendant on december 20. 2003 at its site office ..... neither filed the original arbitration agreement nor any duly certified copy thereof' in terms of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the act. on this ground alone, lite application of the defendant-company is liable to be dismissed.13. mr. b. c. negi, learned counsel for the defendant, however, refers to the contract agreement between the ..... 26, 2004, the defendant filed an application (omp no. 32 of 2004) in civil suit no. 52 of 2003 under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act,1996 (arbitration act for short) for referring the dispute between the parties to an arbitrator.9. onmarch 22, 2004, the plaintiff moved a formal application (omp no. 57 of 2004) .....

Surinder Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ShimLC237

..... there was no other equally efficacious remedy available to the petitioner after his revision petition was dismissed by the financial commissioner-cum-secretary relief and rehabilitation.62. section 36 of the act specifically bars the jurisdiction of the civil courts to entertain any suit or proceedings in respect of any matter which the central ..... certificate dated october 31, 1961. it is interesting to note that there is no original certificate on the records.44. the financial commissioner-cum-secretary revenue and secretary relief and rehabilitation, exercising the revisional powers upheld the orders of the chief settlement commissioner observing that the original sale certificate is available on the ..... of the chief settlement commissioner must be quashed on the ground that there is no finding of the chief settlement commissioner that the company had obtained allotment of the land 'by means of fraud, false representation or concealment of any material fact' within the meaning of section 24(2 .....