Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 22d officers and other staff of authority Page 12 of about 119 results (0.267 seconds)

Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. Vs. Bhaskar Moreshwar Karve and Another.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR3; (1994)96BOMLR831; [1994]81CompCas132(Bom); 1993CriLJ3370

..... but that as far as this item was concerned, the board was asked only to decide. according to shri shah, the managing director, mr. kerkar, and the company secretary were obliged to request the board to decide the proposal favourably. to say that there is no substance in this argument would be an understatement. to my mind, the ..... 1984] mh. 952; : 1985(1)bomcr479 wherein the learned judge has held that the issues involved in that dispute wherein a prosecution under section 630 of the companies act was pending were ones which were of a civil nature and which were required to be decided by a civil court and the learned judge, therefore, disapproved of a ..... for discharge by an order dated november 23, 1992, and on december 1, 1992 framed the charge against the accused for an offence under section 630 of the companies act. 6. the accused thereafter filed criminal revision application no. 378 of 1992 before the court of sessions for greater bombay, principally contending that the framing of charges .....

State of Haryana Vs. Anil Pesticides Limited and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2003]132STC29(P& H)

..... of the negative list dated december 16, 1996 and, therefore, the application of the company for the grant of benefit of sales tax exemption was rejected. feeling aggrieved by this decision, the company filed an appeal before the commissioner and secretary to government of haryana, industries department who by his order dated may 21, 2001 ..... in this petition filed under article 226 of the constitution.2. m/s. anil pesticides limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company') is a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 arid during the year 1994-1995 it set up an industrial unit at village badgodam tehsil kalka district panchkula. the ..... as already observed, the issue is rather technical and the appellate authority having relied upon the report of the technical expert cannot be said to have acted arbitrarily so as to warrant our interference under article 226 of the constitution. in such matters, opinion of the technical experts must weigh with the authorities .....

Modern Food Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. M.D. Juvekar

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1988)1GLR481; (1988)IILLJ534Guj

..... article 106(1) empowers the president to appoint chairman of the board of directors or managing director or managing directors of the company. the first chairman of the board of directors was the secretary to the government of india, ministry of food and agriculture (department of food), art. 106(2) empowers the president to ..... this contention was rejected by the learned single judge. in appeal, the division bench confirmed this view of the learned single judge. the allahabad high court in secretary, home department, government of maharashtra v. bansidhar and others (1982) 2 slr 475 was required to consider a similar contention. in that case the employee wireless ..... under the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at new delhi and units spread all over the country including ahmedabad, has filed this appeal against the order of r. c. mankad, j. dated october 8, 1987 in special civil application no. 1326 of 1980 (reported in m. d. juvekar v. modern bakeries (india) ltd. (1988 .....

Agarwal Agencies and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3426

..... allegation that the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of the director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company. the only allegation, made against the petitioners in paragraph 13 of the complaint, reads as under :(vernacular matter omitted)4. in order to appreciate ..... all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part ..... 1-1999 passed by judicial magistrate, pilibanga taking cognizance against the petitioners for offence under sections 17 and 18 read with section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968.2. briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 20th jan., 1994 insecticides inspector shri mani ram tomar collected sample of methyl parathion 2 .....

S.V. Venkatasubbu and ors. Vs. Utilities (India) Ltd., in Voluntary Li ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1964Mad230

..... the liabiliy of such director cannot be enforced against his legal representatives in those proceedings. the ratio of that decision is that the misfeasance proceedings under the companies act are only available against the specified enumerated persons mentioned therein and not against their executors, administrators, heirs or legal representatives.12. section 543 corresponds to section ..... taken part of in the promotion or formation of the company, or any past or present director, managing agent, secretaries and treasurers, manager, liquidator or officer of the company-(a) has misapplied or retained or become liable or accountable for any money or property of the company, or(b) has been guilty of any misfeasance 01 ..... affirmed it in attorney general for trinidad and tobago v. gordon grant and co., 1935 ac 532 and secretary of state v. mask and co. .9. the liability of a director to pay or return the company's money or property is a general or a common law liability, if such an expression can be .....

The Secretary, Board of Revenue (income-tax) Vs. the Madras Export Co.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1923Mad422; 76Ind.Cas.375

..... officer, salsette building sites v. dasabhai bezanji 20 ind. cas. 763 : 17 c.w.n. 421. see also the observations of lord shaw in secretary of state for india v. chelikani rama rao 35 ind. cas. 902 : 39 m. 617 : 1916 31 m.l.j. 324 : 20 ..... case as arbitrators and at the same time be hearing an appeal from their own decision which had not. yet been given. lord shaw in secretary of state for india v. chelikani rama rao 35 ind. cas. 902 : 39 m. 617 : 1916 31 m.l.j. 324 : ..... with regard to whose procedure, orders and decrees, the rules of the civil procedure code are applicable and that, therefore, an appeal lay to the high court: secretary of state for india v. chelikani rama rao 35 ind. cas. 902 : 39 ma. 617 : 1916 31 m.l.j. 324 : 20 ..... of 1894; and it was there held that, as the land acquisition act conferred no express right of appeal, none existed, following the observation of lord bramwell in sandback charity trustees v. north staffordshire railway company (1878) 3 q.b.d. 1 : 47 l.j.q.b. 10 : .....

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]50SCL171(HP)

..... ) the managing director or managing directors; (b) the whole time director or whole time directors; (c) the manager; (d) the secretary; (e) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the board of directors of the company is accustomed to act; (f) any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with that provision: provided that the person so charged ..... the aforesaid definition of 'officer who is in default' that the managing director(s), if any, whole time directors, if any, manager, if any, secretary, if any, any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions, the board of directors of the company are accustomed to act, any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with the provisions of the .....

Vijay Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]118CompCas604(HP)

..... ) the managing director or managing directors ;(b) the whole-time director or whole-time directors ;(c) the manager;(d) the secretary ;(e) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the board of directors of the company is accustomed to act;(f) any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with that provision :provided that the person so charged ..... the aforesaid definition of 'officer who is in default' that the managing director(s), if any, whole-time directors, if any, manager, if any, secretary, if any, any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions, the board of directors of the company are accustomed to act, any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with the provisions of the .....

Pl Shipping and Logistics Private Limited Vs. A.G.A. Publication Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... ; the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing a civil suit without exhausting which he cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this court under section 433 (e) of the companies act; the respondent has not admitted its debt; the petitioner has not pleaded that the debts of other creditors have not been paid, and that the respondent is commercially ..... modes of performance are impliedly and necessarily forbidden. (krishna chandra sahoo v. bank of india air 2009 orissa 35; state of bihar v. j. a.c. saldanna air 1980 sc 326; haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharastra (2000) 6 scc 179; air 2000 sc 2281; prabha shankar dubey v. state of madhya pradesh air 2004 sc ..... the corporation had ratified the act of signing of the pleading by its officer. (united bank of india v. naresh kumar (1996) 6 scc 660). 17. in view of the requirement of rule 21 of the companies (court) rules, 1959 if the person, who filed the company petition, is neither a director nor the secretary or the principal officer of .....

The State of Bihar Vs. D.N. Ganguly and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1958SC1018; (1958)IILLJ634SC; [1959]1SCR1191

..... formed a union at the close of the last world war. the president of the said union was mr. john and its general secretary was mr. fateh narain singh. on june 22, 1947, the company entered into a collective agreement with the said union and by mutual consent the standing orders and rules, certified under the industrial employment ..... other by mr. bari. on 22 january 1954, the union through its a general secretary, mr. fateh narain singh, served on the company 'a slow-down notice' with effect from february 24, 1954, and on february 6, 1954, mr. bari purporting to act as the president of the union asked his followers to go on strike as from february ..... (standing orders) act of 1946, were settled. the union was recognized as the sole and exclusive collective bargaining agency for the workmen of the company. towards the end of 1954, two groups of the union were formed and rivalry grew between them. .....