Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 22d officers and other staff of authority Page 11 of about 119 results (0.064 seconds)

Sunita Palita Vs. M/s. Panchami Stone Quarry

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . the very fact that the dishonoured cheque was signed by him on behalf of the company, would give rise to responsibility under sub-section (2) of section 141. (iii) in the case of a director, secretary or manager [as defined in section 2(24) of the companies act]. or a person referred to in clauses (e) and (f) of section 5 ..... of the companies act, an averment in the complaint that he was in charge of, and was responsible to the company, for the conduct of the business of the ..... categories of persons were covered by section 141 of the ni act the company who committed the offence as alleged; everyone who was in-charge of or was responsible for the business of the company and any other person who was a director or a manager or a secretary or officer of the company with whose connivance or due to whose neglect the .....

Davis Vs. Patrick

Court : US Supreme Court

..... witness whereof the said parties here unto have set their hands the day and year first above written." "j. r. gole" " secretary, for and on behalf of the flagstaff " " silver mining company of utah, limited " "erwin davis" "witness to the foregoing signatures --" "e. johnson" at the same time and as a part of the same arrangement, ..... with any or all rights, powers, or authority delegated under this agreement, and should the said erwin davis proceed to act upon the powers contained in the last preceding clause, he will consult with the board of directors of the said company as to the new manager from time to time to be appointed. " page 122 u. s. 147 "in ..... the purposes aforesaid, or any of them, and for all or any of the purposes of these presents, to use the name of the said company, and generally to do, execute, and perform any other act, deed, matter, or thing whatsoever which ought to be done, executed, or performed, or which in the opinion of the said john nelson hays .....

V.S. Gupta Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2010]154CompCas1(Delhi)

..... . the very fact that the dishonoured cheque was signed by him on behalf of the company, would give rise to responsibility under sub-section (2) of section 141.(iii) in the case of a director, secretary or manager (as defined in section 2(24) of the companies act) or a person referred to in clauses (e) and (f) of section 5 ..... ) the managing director/s;(b) the whole-time director/s;(c) the manager;(d) the secretary;(e) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the board of directors of the company is accustomed to act;(f) any person charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with that provision (and who has given his consent in ..... petitioner did not become person in-charge of and responsible to the company for conduct and its business.24. since the petitioner was not a director, secretary, manager or any other person falling under any of the categories a to g listed in section 5 of companies act, at the time of commission of the offence, he could not have .....

Blue Print and 13 ors. Vs. Blue Great Eastern Hotels Authority and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT450(HC)

..... had been the owner of a commercial or non-residential property.22. 1980 act i,e. the great eastern hotel (acquisition of undertaking) act 1980 and 1976 act deal with two entirely different and independent sets of properties. 1980 act relates to and deals with the only property called as 'undertaking of the company'. 1976 act on the other hand is concerned with the only property called as 'government ..... notice was required before taking steps for eviction of unauthorised occupiers.' '(r) housing department, government of west bengal, the nodal department under the act, declared the member secretary, great eastern hotel authority, as the prescribed authority under the act for the concerned area. as the unauthorised occupants had failed to vacate the portions illegally occupied by them police assistance was also sought on .....

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd Vs. Ppn Power G ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... jurisdiction of the commission on 24-9-2008. he filed a petition m.a.p.no.2 of 2008 for determination of capital cost. 253. the commission appointed its secretary to scrutinize the petitions of the petitioner and the respondent. he submitted his report on 11-5-2009 which was forwarded to the petitioner and the respondent on 8- ..... the annual invoices may be raised only once is clearly misconceived. as such, the default on the part of the appellant could not have arisen if the respondent company did not act in due compliance of its obligation under the ppa by raising the annual invoices in time. so, the findings of the state commission as well as the facts ..... is barred by limitations is not valid in law in view of the decision of the honble supreme court in (2008) 7 scc 169 consolidated engineers enterprises vs. principal secretary irrigation department. further, the limitation point was discussed by this tribunal vide appeal no.12 and 116 of 2010 dated 7.3.2011 which in turn decided that the .....

Mipco Seamless Rings (Guj.) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1998)(102)ELT396Tri(Mum.)bai

..... was not so established, whereas in the present case the appellants admit that inspection reports are their private records regularly maintained. it is also seen that shri sojitra, company secretary, had given his statement on 20-2-1991 on the duplication theory with reference to his explanatory letter dated 15-2-1991, and specifically pointed out the date ..... ). they were packed in 389 bags (22,788 nos.) with yellow labels and 403 bags contained 21,869 rings with red labels. shri j.b. sojitra, company secretary gave a statement on 9-10-1990 saying the rings found in gunny bags were those which were found unsuitable for manufacture of bearings being not as per customers ..... the classification of unmachined seamless rings was in dispute from 1-3-1986 to 29-2-1988. the appellant claimed classification under such heading 7208.00 central excise traiff act, 1985 as pieces roughly shaped by forging on which duty is at specific rate @ rs. 365 per m.t. while department sought to classify the goods under .....

L. Rama Subbu and anr. Vs. Madura College Board

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1998)93CompCas246

..... 8 and 9 as were then in force and such induction of members was in the interest of the company. the petitioners have also stated that the secretary is not the sole admitting authority and the respondent company has not disclosed as to who were those ten members protesting against the admission of the said four patron ..... more or less the same grounds as are taken in the present petition filed by the first and the second petitioners under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act. as stated above, that suit has now been dismissed and the civil court upheld the legality of the said resolution rejecting the contention taken by the plaintiff ..... three members are taken out from the category of consenting members, then the petitioners failed to have their requisite shareholding as contemplated by section 399 of the act and the petition should fail on that ground. learned counsel has also contended that the petitioners have slept over their alleged right in challenging the said resolution dated .....

Deepak JaIn Vs. Vijaya Leasing Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

..... have been heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. according to shri s. srinivasan, practising company secretary and authorised representative of the companies, section 117c has been inserted by the companies (amendment) act, 2000 with effect from 13-12-2000. prior to the amendment act, 2000 there has been no such provision for creating debenture redemption reserve to safeguard the interests of debenture ..... as to have the effect of altering the law applicable to a claim in litigation at the time when the act was passed". for these reasons, shri srinivasan sought for dismissal of the applications.3. according to shri b. ravi, practising company secretary and authorised representative of the applicants (ca nos. vll1 and 2/2002), section 117c is intended to protect the interests .....

Chase Vs. Curtis

Court : US Supreme Court

..... signed by its president and a majority of its trustees, and verified by the oaths of the president or secretary thereof, and did not file the same in the office of the clerk of the county where the business of the company was carried on, to-wit, the county of new york, nor have they made, published, signed, ..... . 173, showed the distinction between the liability of stockholders for the debts of the corporation, under a section of the same act, making them severally individually liable for the debts and contracts of the company to an amount equal to the amount of stock held by them, respectively, until the whole amount of the capital stock fixed ..... personally liable to pay whatever judgment may be thereafter rendered on account thereof against the corporation? surely not. such claims are not within the contemplation of the act. the mischief to be prevented by its requirements has no relation to liabilities of that description. the creditors to be protected are those only who become such .....

United States Vs. Bitter Root Dev. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... fraudulent purpose, as aforesaid, they organized, on or about the 12th day of august, 1890, the bitter root development company, the defendant. in its articles of incorporation, which were duly filed with the secretary of state of montana, said john r. toole, william toole, and james w. hamilton were named as incorporators, ..... your orator further shows that, in pursuance of said conspiracy and in the execution thereof, the said daly and his associates, acting through and under the corporate name of the defendant bitter root development company, entered into other contracts or agreements with other parties, namely, kendall brothers, harper brothers, g.l. shook, william toole, ..... shows that the said marcus daly and his associates, in further execution of said conspiracy, organized other corporations for the purpose of concealing their illegal acts and complicating and confusing the situation so as to make detection and proof of the same difficult, if not impossible. one of these schemes was .....