Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 22d officers and other staff of authority Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 9 results (0.050 seconds)

T.U. Khatri, Residing at 2/5 Yeshwant Nagar, Goregaon (West) Bombay-40 ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2002Bom268; 2002(3)ALLMR27; 2002(4)BomCR733; (2002)3BOMLR847

..... to theinstitute and upon fulfilment of requisiteconditions including the no objection from the barcouncil of maharashtra, shri khatri was issuedcertificate of practice by the institute inaccordance with the company secretaries act, 1980( for short 'the act of 1980') and the companysecretaries regulations, 1982 ( for short 'theregulations') for the period from 31st october,1986 to 30th june, 1987. the certificate ofpractice issued to shri khatri was renewed ..... rival case set up by theparties and also considered the provisions of theact of 1980 and the regulations and some of therelevant provisions of the companies act, 1956.6. the company secretaries act, 1980 ( actof 1980) was made to provide for regulation anddevelopment of the profession of companysecretaries. section 2(1) defines variousexpressions, inter alia, 'company secretary' meansa person who is a member of the institute;'council' means the council .....

Rajeev Kapur and Others Vs. Grentex and Company Private Limited and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the name and style of grentex and company in the year 1980 with late shyamsunder kapur, appellant no.1 and respondent no.2 as its partners. subsequently on 28th september 1992, the company was incorporated as a company limited by shares under the provisions of the act. the authorised share capital of the company is rs. 500 lakhs divided into ..... all statutory records. as there was no response from respondent no.2, the appellant no. 1 addressed a letter dated 28th january, 2008 to the company secretary of the company requesting him to hand over charge of all documents pertaining to the property assets group. on 25th february 2008, the appellant no. 1 addressed a letter ..... disputes had arisen between him and respondent no.2 since december 2003. he has also relied on his email dated 5th january 2005 addressed to the company secretary informing him that whatever resolutions are hereafter made should bear his signatures so as to ensure that all resolutions are to his knowledge and the said request .....

M/S. General Detergents Vs. Arun H. Merchant the Executive Director of ...

Court : Mumbai

..... principal officer of the company. such exercise would have helped the complainant to explore and bring before the court. applicant's efforts to prove that in exclusion ..... suffer due to dishonour of the cheque to call from the signatories of cheque, as well from principal officers of company such as the company secretary, managing director, full time directors and even other directors of the company concerned, and call them to furnish information such as : (i) the details as regards the authority of signatory ..... section 18 of limitation act. (c) admission on the documents filed by accused before bifr. 32. it is not the case of the appellant that any steps which are illustratively referred in earlier paras of this judgment were resorted to. any summons was not sought to secure attendance of the company secretary or any other .....

Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas377(Bom); [1971]41ITR377(Bom)

..... office or place of profit under a company. - (1) save as provided in sub-section (2), no company shall, after the commencement of this act, appoint or employ any firm or body corporate to or in any office or place of profit under the company, other than the office of managing agent secretaries and treasurers or trustee for the ..... holders of debentures of the company, for a term exceeding five years ..... (2) if any office or place of profit is held in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (1), the director, partner, relative, firm, private company, managing agent, secretaries and treasurers or the manager, concerned, shall be deemed to have vacated his or its office as such on and from the date next following the date of .....

Saumil Dilip Mehta Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2002Bom194; 2002(3)ALLMR489; 2002(2)BomCR594; (2002)3BOMLR514; [2003]113CompCas443(Bom); 2002(2)MhLj36; [2004]138STC258(Bom)

..... take a decision whether the board is accepting his resignation or not. an intimation should be sent to such director and after such resolution is passed, the company secretary is under the obligation to comply with the legal formalities for giving a finishing touch to the resolution which has been passed in the said meeting of the ..... tendered by the petitioner by filling in form 32 and it has not been so tendered in view of provisions of section 303 sub-section (2) of the companies act. he further submitted that as no legal steps have been taken and the resignation has not been tendered legally, the petitioner cannot seek the protection of this ..... annual general meeting. 7. when a director has tendered his resignation and the board of directorshas accepted it and has acted on it, such director cannot be held liable for theliability incurred by the said company after the date of acceptance of hisresignation except the liability which has been incurred by him for purchase ofshares of the .....

The Commissoner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. the Remington Typewriter Com ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1928Bom465; (1928)30BOMLR1190; 113Ind.Cas.602

..... pay these dividends, and not to receive them : and here i would respectfully follow the decision of mr. justice woodroffe and mr. justice greaves in imperial tobacco company of india, id. v. the secretary of state for india i.l.r (1922) cal 721, which i have already dealt with in my judgment in the hongkong corporation case. as regards the actual ..... is not a business connection under section 42(i) or 43 of the act. provision is made in the act for deducting tax on dividends at the source. furthermore, it was held by the majority of the court in the case of imperial tobacco company of india, ltd. v. the secretary of state of india (1922) l.l.r. 49 cal. 721. that the ..... company in that case could not be considered as an agent in receipt of dividends .....

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Yadavgir Dharamgir

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1936Bom19; (1935)37BOMLR931; 160Ind.Cas.505

..... as are not charged with functions which are in themselves the acts or the attributes of sovereignty. as the secretary of state for india in council is now liable to the same extent as the east india company was, it seems to me to be extremely probable that the secretary of state would be bound by his contracts with private individuals, ..... mr. justice tyabji seem to have been partly based on an alleged distinction between the crown as representing the east india company and the crown in its ordinary capacity. but in the case of denning v. the secretary of state there is a. discussion of the relevant statutes which seems to indicate that no such distinction could properly be made ..... the courts ; and he urges that the dismissal of a servant whose duties are in no way duties of state is not an act of state. in the case of jehangir m. cursetji v. secretary of state this aspect of the question was touched upon by the learned judge who decided it. but the discussion was not strictly necessary .....

Jer Rutton Kavasmanek and anr. Vs. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... companies (amendment) act, 2000. 31] on 5th may 2001, the said extra ordinary general meeting was held. the appellants opposed the proposed resolution. the proposed resolution for amendment of the articles of association was not passed. the appellants amongst the other shareholders voted against the said resolution. after this eogm, one mr.udayan maroo, the company secretary ..... 1984) 8. (1978) 1 scc 215 (cosmosteels private ltd. and ors. v. jairam das gupta & ors.) 9. (1977) company cases vol.47 page 92 (bennet coleman & co. v. union of india and ors.) 10.(1980) company cases vol.50 page 771 (debi jhora tea co. ltd. v. barendra krishna bhowmick & ors.) 11.(2005) 11 scc 73 ( ..... claude-lila parulekar (smt) v. sakal papers (p) ltd. and ors.) 12.(1986) company cases vol. 59 page46 (bhubaneshwar singh & anr. v. kanthal india .....

Khojeste Mistree and ors. Vs. Bombay Parsi Punchayet and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR786; 2008(4)BomCR617

..... have to take a decision whether the board is accepting his resignation or not. an intimation should be sent to such director and after such resolution is passed, the company secretary is under the obligation to comply with the legal formalities for giving a finishing touch to the resolution which has been passed in the said meeting of the board ..... required to take any steps under section 22 and the duty of the other trustees to do so. the provisions of section 22 are similar to the provisions of the companies act, 1956 under which change in directorship is required to be informed to the registrar by filing form no. 32. it has been held that failure to file such ..... insolvent. faith. e) if he should by reason e) if he should by reason of mental or bodily of mental or bodily infirmity be incapable of infirmity be incapable of acting. acting. f) if he ceases to f) if he ceases to profess the zoroastrian profess the zoroastrian faith. faith. g) if such person resigns g) if such person resign from .....

Supertex Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2002Bom18

..... the petitioner has lost the advantage of subsidy for last 12 years. severe financial stress has been caused to the company and it would further suffer if the matter is again remitted to the joint secretary to the government of india for adjudication. according to the learned counsel, even if certain facts are required to be ..... it must have control directly or indirectly over any body corporate, firm or trust. what is meant by 'associated persons' is also defined by the act and it means any company of which such director, whether independently or together with his relatives, constitutes one-fourth of its board of director. according to mr. joshi, therefore, ..... particular kind of industries fulfilling the requirements of the 1971 scheme as stipulated in the conditions of the scheme mentioned therein and, therefore, the government cannot act arbitrarily and pick up some industries for grant of such subsidy and deny the same to others for reasons which have no relation with the object of .....