Communicated - Judgment Search Results

C. Cetty Mani and Others Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Governm ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... not follow 8221 10 at the time of hearing learned counsel for the applicant produced communication in letter no 138 1 2010 css dated 28 4 2011 wherein the respondents were ..... hon ble mr b venkateswara rao judicial member the applicants belong to scheduled caste community are all similarly placed and working as junior telecom officers in the office of the .....

C. Manoharan Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Government Departme ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp the applicants belong to scheduled caste community are all similarly placed and working as junior telecom officers in the office of the ..... did not follow 10 at the time of hearing learned counsel for the applicant produced communication in letter no 138 1 2010 css dated 28 4 2011 wherein the respondents are .....

C. Gopalan Vs. Union of India Represented by Secretary to the Governme ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... terminal benefits of the applicant within a period of 2 months from the date of communication of this order failure to release the same within the aforesaid period would entail the .....

Smt. Janakiamma and Another Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secr ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

1 the applicants have filed this original application challenging annexure a 1 order by which the respondents have rejected the...

P.M. Suni and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

k george joseph administrative member 1 the applicants in this o a are candidates for promotion to the post of...

R. Anilkumar Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Departme ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

dr k b s rajan judicial member 1 the only legal question involved in this case is when and how...

The Indian Performing Right Society Vs. A.D. Venture Communication Ind ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2012(5)CTC(IP)20

..... nbsp nbsp the case of the plaintiff is that defendant infringed its copyright by communicating the above referred works to the public the plaintiff has accordingly sought an ..... injunction restraining the defendant from organizing the events including communicating plaintiff 8217 s repertoire of musical works administered to the public without obtaining license .....

S.K. Tiwari Vs. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Communi ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... in these circumstances that the acrs below the bench mark were communicated to the applicant after the acrs were reviewed by the ..... under which the adverse acrs and below bench mark acrs were communicated to the applicant they have pointed out that the applicant was ..... the applicant to challenge his below bench mark and adverse remarks communicated to him since they were based on the memorandums issued .....

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Himachal Futuristic Communications Li ...

Court: Delhi

..... by the learned sole arbitrator in the dispute between it and the respondent himachal futuristic communications limited 8216 hfcl 8217 formerly known as himachal telematics limited 8216 htl 8217 arising out ..... award passed by the arbitrator in the dispute between petitioner and the respondent himachal futuristic communications limited 8216 hfcl 8217 arising out of a purchase order for supply of 148 .....

M/S. Starnet Communications Pvt. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court: Delhi

..... initiating poc activities shortly for all the three lsa s emphasis supplied 12 the aforesaid communication was accompanied by three separate but identical undertakings for each of the three lsas issued ..... that in a matter of this nature such oral understanding can hardly be appreciated when communications were being exchanged between the parties on every issue 14 learned counsel for the petitioner .....