Communicated - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: communicated Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.044 seconds)Landmark Communications, Inc. Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-01-1978
..... judges as individuals or as anointed priests set apart from the community and spared the criticism to which in a democracy other public ..... of the same virginia law under which landmark was prosecuted nationwide communications inc v backus no 77 0139 r mar 15 1977 thereafter ..... publish because of the court order shielding them from prosecution landmark communication inc v campbell no 77 404 n ed va june 17 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNixon Vs. Warner Communications, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-1978
..... on november 12 1974 the public broadcasting system joined the application the next day warner communications inc filed a separate application on december 2 1974 footnote 5 for a detailed discussion ..... u s 589 1978 u s supreme court nixon v warner communications inc 435 u s 589 1978 nixon v warner communications inc no 76 944 argued november 8 1977 decided april .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFcc Vs. Pacifica Foundation
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1978
..... do not support even the professedly moderate degree of governmental homogenization of radio communications if indeed such homogenization can ever be moderate given the preeminent status of ..... and children in the audience rationales as justification for expunging from the airways protected communications the commission finds offensive taken to their logical extreme these rationales would support .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFcc Vs. National Citizens Committee
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1978
..... for the district of columbia circuit syllabus after a lengthy rulemaking proceeding the federal communications commission fcc adopted regulations prospectively barring the initial licensing or the transfer of ..... broadcast combinations existing combinations are generally permitted to continue in operation however in communities in which there is common ownership of the only daily newspaper and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPinkus Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-23-1978
..... jury were improper because they included children and sensitive persons within the definition of the community by whose standards obscenity was to be judged charged that members of deviant sexual ..... 6 emphasis added however one defines sensitive or insensitive persons they are part of the community the contention that the instruction was erroneous because it included sensitive persons is therefore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirst Nat'l Bank of Boston Vs. Bellotti
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-26-1978
..... amendment rights generally have been afforded only to corporations engaged in the communications business or through which individuals express themselves and the court below apparently ..... on matters irrelevant to its business the governmental interest in regulating corporate political communications especially those relating to electoral matters also raises considerations which differ significantly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gopal Chandra Misra and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-15-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC694; [1978(37)FLR16]; (1978)ILLJ492SC; (1978)2SCC301; [1978]3SCR12
..... court judge or other constitutional functionaries indicated above could withdraw the resignation after communicating the same to the appropriate authority or even before the date from which ..... functionaries like the president vice president speaker etc the resignation once submitted and communicated to the appropriate authority becomes complete and irrevocable and acts ex proprio vigore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHouchins Vs. Kqed, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-1978
..... the district attorney and the court social services officers were permitted to contact relatives community agencies employers etc by phone to assist in counseling inmates with vocational educational ..... to prevent 25 persons with cameras from photographing inmates and security operations moreover communication with inmates would not be permitted because of excessive time consumption problems with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBallew Vs. Georgia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-1978
..... are preferable to smaller juries six they produce longer deliberations more communication far better community representation and possibly greater verdict reliability consistency saks 107 far from ..... untoward differences in verdicts and that prevents juries from truly representing their communities attains constitutional significance georgia here presents no persuasive argument that a reduction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-15-1978
Reported in: [1978]113ITR380(Cal)
..... and it was not necessary that the order of assessment should be communicated to the assessee within that period c m chockalingam and m ..... passed under section 23 3 of the act not having been communicated to the assessee within four years after the end of the ..... the issue of notice under section 29 and service of notice or communication of the assessment order are different stages or steps before an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial