Communicated - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: communicated Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 309 results (0.091 seconds)Escotel Mobile Communications Limited Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-1997
Reported in: 1997IIIAD(Delhi)520; 1997(2)ARBLR33(Delhi); 1997(41)DRJ217
..... conditions mentioned in schedule b annexed hereto the learned counsel next refers to the following communications to reiterate that the petitioners had actually bid for haryana circle which will include ..... mentioned in schedule b annexed hereto the learned counsel next refers to the following communications to reiterate that the petitioners had actually bid for haryana circle which will include .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecretary, Ministry of Communications and ors. Vs. Sakkubai and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-02-1997
Reported in: JT1998(9)SC297; (1997)11SCC224
..... leave petitions 3 part time casual workers in posts and telegraphs department ministry of communications filed applications before different benches of the central administrative tribunal claiming the benefit of ..... a letter dated 17 5 1989 issued by the government of india ministry of communications department of posts giving a clarification regarding casual labourers and part time casual labourers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrone Communications Limited Vs. Collr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-1997
Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT486TriDel
..... be mounted and they were used to be ultimately in telephone exchange 2 under their communication dated 5 3 1997 the appellants have prayed for decision on merits 3 we have ..... 1 m s krone communications limited bangalore were engaged in the manufacture of telephone connectors including back panel connectors they .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAditya Mass Communicated Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Trans ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-1997
Reported in: 1997(5)ALT411
..... case has to be tested only on the basis of terms and conditions under which communication of acceptance is not necessary and opening of tender is sufficient according to him when ..... in the opening of the tenders according to the learned counsel for the respondent this communication dated 15 11 1996 of the petitioner was received only at 12 10 p m .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarish Kumar Agarwal Vs. Punjab Communications Ltd.
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Dec-16-1997
Reported in: (1998)92CompCas303
..... under section 113 3 of the companies act 1956 hereinafter called the act against punjab communications limited sas nagar punjab the cause of action relates to the delay in the delivery .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPythagoras Communication Vs. Collector of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-1997
Reported in: (1998)(59)ECC401
1 the appellant in c appeal no 1641 90 a is absent in spite of notice of hearing there is...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTApsrtc, Mushirabad, Hyderabad Vs. Sri Aditya Mass Communications Pvt. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD286; 1997(6)ALT160
orderp s mishra cj 1 this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent has been preferred against the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEscotel Mobile Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-07-1997
Reported in: 1997(43)DRJ582
a k srivastava j 1 this is an application under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 with...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Communication Cable Co. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-1997
Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT267TriDel
1 both these appeals one by the appellants and the other by the revenue were heard together and are being...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Through Secretary, Govt. of India Ministry of Communica ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-04-1997
Reported in: 1998(3)ALLMR816; 1998(2)BomCR874
orderr m s khandeparkar j 1 this is a revision application against the order dated 23rd october 1996 passed in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial