Skip to content


Communicated - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: communicated Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.064 seconds)
Nov 01 1966 (HC)

V. Sivakamayya Vs. Secretary to Government of India, Department of Com ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-01-1966

Reported in: AIR1968AP283; (1969)IILLJ485AP

..... reports after an adverse entry was made under the departmental instructions the entry was communicated to the petitioner and the petitioner made representation relating to the adverse remarks made ..... the president the petitioner offered his explanation when adverse remarks made against him were communicated to him and made representations to the director general of post and telegraph and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1966 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secy. Ministry of Communication, Govt ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-16-1966

Reported in: AIR1966P& H500

1 this judgment will dispose of regular first appeal no 81 d of 1960 and regular first appeal no 23...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 1966 (FN)

Ginzburg Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-21-1966

..... only four of the 15 articles predominantly appealed to prurient interest and substantially exceeded community standards of candor while the other articles were admittedly nonoffensive but the trial judge ..... brother brennan is that the material must be patently offensive because it affronts contemporary community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters nothing that i .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 1966 (FN)

Schmerber Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-20-1966

..... incriminating product of compulsion was neither petitioner s testimony nor evidence relating to some communicative act or writing by the petitioner it was not inadmissible on privilege grounds iii ..... an incriminating product of compulsion was neither petitioner s testimony nor evidence relating to some communicative act or writing by the petitioner it was not inadmissible on privilege grounds page .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 17 1966 (FN)

Evans Vs. Newton

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-17-1966

..... education trusts for the advancement of religion and trusts for other purposes beneficial to the community not falling under any of the preceding heads see also restatement second trusts 368 1959 ..... two new york cases which in turn held marsh inapplicable to a privately operated residential community of apartment buildings housing 35 000 residents watchtower bible tract soc y v metropolitan life .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1966 (HC)

Natverlal Jayshanker Trivedi Vs. E.F. Deboo and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Feb-02-1966

Reported in: (1966)7GLR574

..... farther complains that such a decision if recorded has not been communicated to him 6 now in order to understand the first ..... and the detaining authority is entitled to use agent for such communication ordinarily the post office would be the agent of the ..... his affidavits that the senior member of the reviewing authority shall communicate his report to the other member the detaining authority may be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 1966 (HC)

In Re: S.S.M. Subramaniam Chettiar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-26-1966

Reported in: 1967CriLJ1232

..... of the evidence act indicates that the section applies to communications from one public officer to another public officer in the ..... use of the word confidential in referring to the words communications in official confidence old field j observed that they import ..... or direction for its maintenance but include generally all matters communicated by one officer to another in performance of their duties .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1966 (FN)

Osborn Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-12-1966

..... official duties or corruptly or by threats or force or by any threatening letter or communication influences obstructs or impedes or endeavors to influence obstruct or impede the due administration of ..... the opinion of mr justice brennan that the fantastic advances in the field of electronic communication constitute a great danger to the privacy of the individual that indiscriminate use of such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 1966 (FN)

Memoirs Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-21-1966

..... not constitutionally protected against regulation and proscription if to the average person applying contemporary community standards the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to ..... may have adverse effects upon individual mental health with potentially disruptive consequences for the community footnote 3 7 in addition there is persuasive evidence from criminologists and police .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1966 (SC)

Narinder Mohan Pass Vs. General Manager Northern Railway

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-12-1966

..... the aforementioned directions of the board the general manager northern railway issued the following communication to the divisional superintendents in the northern railway subject selection for the post of ..... the petitioners stand removed from the panel their efforts to get withdrawn the aformentioned communication of the general manager northern railway have failed hence these writ petitions the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //