Coaching - Judgment Search Results
Coach Bihar Dist. Deed Writers' Assn. and another Vs. District Registr ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-23-1994
Reported in: AIR1995Cal372,(1995)1CALLT120(HC),1995(1)CHN444,99CWN314
clerks from doing any function of deed writer in the Registration Offices. The petitioner No. 1 is the Coach Bihar District Deed Writers' Association of which the petitioner No. 2 is the Secretary. The petitioner No. 2
Sundaram Industries Employees Union (Coach Division) Vs. Management of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2000
Reported in: (2000)IILLJ990Mad
N.V. Bala Subramanian, J.1. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare the demand of respondents 1 and 2 (hereinafter to be referred to as the management) that the members...
Jyoti Kumar, Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer/Plant, Integral Coach Fa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-1991
Reported in: (1991)1MLJ500
in terms of Clause 2900 of the said conditions of contract, MrJyothikumar, Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer (Plant), Integral Coach Factory, Madras-38, was nominated as the sole Arbitrator by the General Manager/Integral Coach Factory, Madras-38, to decide the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
international Coach Builders Ltd. Vs. Karnataka State Financial Corpn.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-05-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC2012; [2003]114CompCas614(SC); (2003)2CompLJ166(SC); JT2003(2)SC395; 2003(2)SCALE677; (2003)10SCC482; [2003]2SCR631; (2003)2UPLBEC1022
filed under Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to wind up the company known as International Coach Builders Ltd. Another petition by another creditor was also filed on 2.11.88. On 10.11.89, during the pendency of
TVR Coach Builders Vs The State Tax Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.373 and 374 of 2026 M/s.TVR Coach Builders, Rep by its authorized Signatory Mr.Prasanna Venkatesh, No.162/15, Thanthonimalai, Karur - 639 005. ... Petitioner Vs. The
Dinesh Coaching Centre vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-13-2026
DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:1. DINESH COACHING CENTREREPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI.N.V. DINESH, S/O. LATE VISHWESWARIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.445, 1ST CROSS,
Ved Parkash @ Coach Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5450-2014 Date of Decision: March 3, 2014 Ved Parkash @ Coach ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr. A.K. Sama, Advocate,
HMM Coaches Limited now M/s HMM Infra Limited and Others Vs. Presiding ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-24-2015
a common order. The relevant facts are taken from CWP No.27578 of 2013. S.No.Case No.Particulars1CWP No.27578 of 2013HMM Coaches Limited now M/s HMM Infra Limited v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambala and another2CWP No.27580 of 2013HMM Coaches
Paramount Coaching Centre Pvt Ltd. Vs.gopal Krishan @ Gopal Verma & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2017
VII Rule 11 CPC), 10556/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC) and Crl.M.A.No.12978/2017 (under Section 340 Cr.PC) PARAMOUNT COACHING CENTRE PVT LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar & Mr. Devesh Gupta, Advs. Versus
Coach India vs Superintendent of Central Tax and Central Excise
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-19-2024
service tax for the relevant year(s), though the petitioner services come within the meaning of ‘commercial training and coaching service’. 2.The show cause notice dated 13.06.2018 was issued to the petitioner, directing the petitioner to show cause
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free