Dinesh Coaching Centre vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Mar 13, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1521397

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1521397
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: E.S.Indiresh
Decided On: Mar 13, 2026
Case Number: WP/4228/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dinesh Coaching Centre

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to setting aside the order dated 29.01.2026 passed in case no.g2/1353/tu no-01/2025-26 3987 by the 2nd respondent as per the annexure-e, and allow the above writ petition or pass other suitable orders or directions as this hon'ble court deems fit under thefacts and circumstances of the case.this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice e.s.indireshoral ordersri. g.s. venkata subbarao, learned counsel, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 3. -3-2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.3. in this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 29.01.2026 (annexure-e) passed by respondent no. 2.4. a perusal of the arguments advanced by thelearned counsel for the parties, as well as the writ papers, indicates that respondent no.2 has issued the impugned official memorandum dated 29.01.2026, and thereby quashing the registration/permission granted to the petitioner to conduct a coaching centre.5. on careful consideration of annexure-e, it isevident that no material has been considered by respondent no.2, nor there are any allegations made against the petitioner, as is apparent from the impugned order. -4-6. in that view of the matter, the impugnedorder/ official memorandum dated 29.01.2026 is passed without application of mind and does not disclose any valid or sufficient reasons for quashing the registration of the coaching centre run by the petitioner. hence, the petition is allowed. the order / official memorandum dated 29.01.2026 (annexure-e) passed by respondent no. 2 is hereby quashed as the matter shall not fall within the purview of the provisions contained in the karnataka tutorial institutions (registration and regulation) rules, 2001. sd/- (e.s.indiresh) judge sb list no.: 1 sl no.: 7

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1. DINESH COACHING CENTRE
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI.N.V. DINESH, S/O. LATE VISHWESWARIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.445, 1ST CROSS, MARUTHI TEMPLE ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU- 570023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y.K. NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE)

AND: Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001.

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION MYSURU-570001. -2-

3. SRI. SRINIVAS PRASAD, S/O LATE PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.444, 1ST CROSS, MARUTHI TEMPLE ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR, MYSURU-570023. …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.S. VENKATA SUBBARAO, ADVOCATE FO RR3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2026 PASSED IN CASE NO.G2/1353/TU NO-01/2025-26 3987 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER THE ANNEXURE-E, AND ALLOW THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION OR PASS OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE

FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL ORDER

Sri. G.S. Venkata Subbarao, learned counsel, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 3. -3-

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 29.01.2026 (Annexure-E) passed by Respondent No. 2.

4. A perusal of the arguments advanced by the

learned counsel for the parties, as well as the writ papers, indicates that Respondent No.2 has issued the impugned Official Memorandum dated 29.01.2026, and thereby quashing the registration/permission granted to the petitioner to conduct a coaching centre.

5. On careful consideration of Annexure-E, it is

evident that no material has been considered by Respondent No.2, nor there are any allegations made against the petitioner, as is apparent from the impugned order. -4-

6. In that view of the matter, the impugned

order/ Official Memorandum dated 29.01.2026 is passed without application of mind and does not disclose any valid or sufficient reasons for quashing the registration of the coaching centre run by the petitioner. Hence, the petition is allowed. The order / Official Memorandum dated 29.01.2026 (Annexure-E) passed by Respondent No. 2 is hereby quashed as the matter shall not fall within the purview of the provisions contained in the Karnataka Tutorial Institutions (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2001. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2026 Same Parties Dinesh Coaching Centre vs State of Karnataka Same Judge E.S.Indiresh