Skip to content


Co Maker - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: co maker Page 1 of about 54 results (0.017 seconds)
Feb 01 2019 (HC)

Maninder Singh Maker and Ors vs.ajit Singh Maker and Ors

Court: Delhi

documents appear to have been handed over to the Local Commissioner by the staff, who were present at the time of The trust is being currently managed by Shri Ajit Singh Maker, his wife and persons appointed on their behalf. (iii) All

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 2017 (HC)

Maninder Singh Maker and Ors vs.ajit Singh Maker and Ors

Court: Delhi

who is the wife of Mr.Ajit Singh Maker.12. Learned senior counsels appearing for Mr.Ajit Singh Maker and Mrs.Jupinder Kaur, under instructions Defendant Mrs.Jupinder Kaur who is the wife of Mr.Ajit Singh Maker.12. Learned senior counsels appearing for Mr.Ajit Singh Maker and Mrs.Jupinder

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 2018 (HC)

Maninder Singh Maker and Ors vs.ajit Singh Maker and Ors

Court: Delhi

review the order dated 20.11.2017 by filing these documents but could not satisfy such documents if were not available with the & Mr.Alok Tripathi, Advocates for plaintiff No.2. versus AJIT SINGH MAKER AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Samrat Nigam, Mr.Sudarshan Rajan &

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 2005 (HC)

Zenith Fashions Makers (P) Ltd. Vs. Ultimate Fashion Makers Ltd. and a ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2006]130CompCas526(Delhi); 121(2005)DLT297; 2005(83)DRJ471

taking cognizance. 5. In my opinion, the action of the court or in other words the mistake of the M.M. cannot

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 01 1991 (TRI)

Makers Development Services Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1992)40ITD185(Mum.)

amalgamating company's case was sought to be added in amalgamated company' s case, and the same was deleted by the Tribunal. name of the amalgamating companies which had merged with M/s. Maker Development Services P. Ltd. The notice of reopening issued on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 1985 (FN)

Pattern Makers Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

periodic dues and the initiation fees uniformly required as a condition of acquiring or retaining membership." [ Footnote 15 ] Section Court Pattern Makers v. NLRB, 473 U.S. 95 (1985) Pattern Makers' League of North America, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, No. 83-1894 Argued

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1926 (FN)

Western Paper Makers' Chem. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

and the Interstate Commerce Commission was brought in the federal court for Western Michigan to enjoin in part and to modify Co. v. United States, 271 U.S. 268 (1926) Western Paper Makers' Chemical Company v. United States No. 312 Argued May 4,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2008 (HC)

Makers Development Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M. Visvesvaraya Industrial R ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR1; 2008(5)BomCR821; (2008)110BOMLR1406

operative, whereas if such efforts are not successful then the contract will carry on as at present in respect of Hotelcum 1. On the current status of the hotel project, Dr Maker outlined for the members the historical background giving details of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 2011 (SC)

Makers Devt.Services P.Ltd. Vs. M. Visvesvaraya Indusl.Res. and Develo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2012(1)CTC106; 2012(1)SCC735; 2012(1)MLJ968; AIR2012SCW107; 2012(2)LW103; 2012(1)KCCR15(SC)(SN); AIR2012SC437; 2012(3)SCJ624

words, if the appellant was allowed to proceed with the construction on the suit land, in the event of dismissal of (C) No. 22276 of 2011 has been filed by the Makers Development Services Pvt. Ltd. against the order dated 28.06.2011 passed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 1987 (TRI)

Makers Development Services (P) Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(15)ECC1

part of the property sold to the appellants. The main contention of Shri Chandrasekharan is that when it is admitted that 1. The appellants M/s. Makers Development Services (P) Ltd. purchased the mini cement plant of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //