Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajit Singh Maker & Anr. vs Pritpal Singh & Ors.

Ajit Singh Maker & Anr. vs Pritpal Singh & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 15, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1256144

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CS(OS)/119/2026
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajit Singh Maker & Anr.

Respondent

Pritpal Singh & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Kunal Gosain, Mr. Kunal Sashni

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi + cs(os) 119/2026 & i.a. nos. 3589/2026, 3590/2026, 3591/2026 & ajit singh maker & anr. .....plaintiffs through: none.versuspritpal singh & ors. .....defendants through: mr. kunal gosain and mr. kunal sashni, advs. for d-1, along with d-1 in person. mob: 9999449903 email: [email protected]:hon'ble ms. justice mini pushkarnaorder% 15.05.20261. none appears for the plaintiffs, when the matter is called out.2. none had appeared for the plaintiffs even on the last date of hearing.3. learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 1 submits that thepresent is a frivolous suit, as the agreement between the parties was a consent agreement, as filed in cs(os) 558/2014 and cs(os) 3121/2011.4. it is submitted that the defendant no. 1 had earlier filed contemptproceedings against the plaintiffs, being cont.cas(c) 755/2021, titled as “pritpal singh versus jupinder kaur maker & anr.”, wherein, the court has already passed a judgment dated 14th november, 2025, holding the plaintiffs herein as guilty of contempt.5. it is submitted that the division bench of this court has alreadyconfirmed the said order vide its judgment dated 17th december, 2025 in cont. app. (c) 20/2025. further, an appeal before the supreme court has also been dismissed on 16th january, 2026, in special leave to appeal (c)6. accordingly, the present suit along with the pending applications, isdismissed for non-prosecution.7. considering the submissions made before this court, a cost of rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lac only) in total is directed, to be paid jointly and severally by the plaintiffs to defendant no. 1, within a period of 8 weeks, from today.8. in case, the aforesaid cost is not paid to the defendant no. 1 within thestipulated period, the defendant no. 1 is granted liberty to approach this court, by way of an appropriate application in that regard.mini pushkarna, jmay 15, 2026/sk

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 119/2026 & I.A. Nos. 3589/2026, 3590/2026, 3591/2026 & AJIT SINGH MAKER & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: None.

versus

PRITPAL SINGH & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kunal Gosain and Mr. Kunal Sashni, Advs. for D-1, along with D-1 in person. Mob: 9999449903 Email: [email protected]

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

ORDER

% 15.05.2026

1. None appears for the plaintiffs, when the matter is called out.

2. None had appeared for the plaintiffs even on the last date of hearing.

3. Learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 1 submits that the

present is a frivolous suit, as the agreement between the parties was a consent agreement, as filed in CS(OS) 558/2014 and CS(OS) 3121/2011.

4. It is submitted that the defendant no. 1 had earlier filed contempt

proceedings against the plaintiffs, being CONT.CAS(C) 755/2021, titled as “Pritpal Singh Versus Jupinder Kaur Maker & Anr.”, wherein, the Court has already passed a judgment dated 14th November, 2025, holding the plaintiffs herein as guilty of contempt.

5. It is submitted that the Division Bench of this Court has already

confirmed the said order vide its judgment dated 17th December, 2025 in CONT. APP. (C) 20/2025. Further, an appeal before the Supreme Court has also been dismissed on 16th January, 2026, in Special Leave to Appeal (C)

6. Accordingly, the present suit along with the pending applications, is

dismissed for non-prosecution.

7. Considering the submissions made before this Court, a cost of Rs.

1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) in total is directed, to be paid jointly and severally by the plaintiffs to defendant no. 1, within a period of 8 weeks, from today.

8. In case, the aforesaid cost is not paid to the defendant no. 1 within the

stipulated period, the defendant no. 1 is granted liberty to approach this Court, by way of an appropriate application in that regard.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

MAY 15, 2026/SK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial