Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Chicks - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 2019

Kaikhosrou(chick) Kavasji Framji and Anr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-15-2019

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5574 OF2009Kaikhosrou (Chick) Kavasji Framji & Anr. ….Appellant(s) VERSUS Union of India & Anr. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is filed...


Jun 17 2009

Kaikhosrou (Chick) Kavasji Framji of Indian Inhabitant and Jawahir (Je ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-17-2009

Reported in: 2009(5)BomCR200; 2009(111)BomLR2641

V.C. Daga, J.1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice dated 31st July, 2001, (the impugned notice) issued by the respondent No. 2 to the petitioners...


May 16 1988

Chick Kam Choo Vs. Exxon Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-16-1988

Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp. - 486 U.S. 140 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 01 1994

Gopalakrishna Sharma Vs. Jyothi Nagaram Chick Venkatashamaiah

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-01-1994

Reported in: ILR1994KAR821

of the Court of the Civil Judge, Chinthamani.2. The petitioner Gopalakrishna Sharma is the plaintiff and Jyothi Nagaram Chicka Venkatashamaiah and S.V. Subbanna, respondents 1 and 2 herein, are defendants 1 and 2 respectively in the suit


May 18 1920

Sundar and ors. Vs. Habib Chick and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-18-1920

Reported in: 60Ind.Cas.81

Piggott, J.1. The matter now before us arises out of the following facts. Au appeal had been filed in the Court below by certain persons who are the respondents in First Appeal from Order No. 84...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial