Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Certain Premises - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 19 2017

Bcl Secure Premises (P) Ltd. Vs. Metro Railway, Kolkata

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-19-2017

the applicability of this sub-section by an express agreement in writing.” The Seventh Schedule to the Act specifies certain relationships. If a person who is intended to be appointed as an arbitrator falls in that relationship with … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side A.P.No.374 of 2017 BCL Secure Premises (P) LTD.versus Metro Railway, Kolkata For the petitioners:- Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Jishnu Saha..Sr.Adv.Srinanda Bose Pankaj Agarwal J.D.Roy …Advocates For the Respondent:-


Oct 14 2004

Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Municipa ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-14-2004

Reported in: (2005)107BOMLR843; 2005(1)MhLj547

which was partially occupied had the rate able value fixed at Rs. 1,01,285/- was revised by reason of certain additions which were made in the units. The revision was an upward one. Some of the units in … objections to the reassessment on 8-1-2004. The petitioners thereafter submitted a tabulated statement showing details of the self-occupied premises and other details as were called upon by the Corporation in respect of the said property and the


Aug 22 2007

Peacebird Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Collector of Stamps of Mumb ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-22-2007

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR51; 2008(1)MhLj865

1st, 2nd and 3rd floors and said Champaklal Chimanlal Shah whereupon the agreement for sale of the respective premises in the occupation of the said tenants on ownership basis were executed between the said Champaklal Chimanlal Shah


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 01 2005

Harish Commercial Premises Co-op Soc. Ltd. Vs. Varsha Dinesh Joshi and ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-01-2005

Reported in: 2006(2)ALLMR1; 2006(5)BomCR853

are necessary which are briefly enumerated as under:2. The petitioner is a registered co-operative society of a commercial premises situated at 205/206, S.V. Road, Andheri (West), Bombay-50.3. It is the case of the petitioner that respondents before


Jun 29 2004

Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-29-2004

Reported in: [2010]320ITR414(Bom); [2004]140TAXMAN145(Bom)

of transfer fee received by the assessee during the years under appeal as a result of transfer/sale of certain office premises by the existing members of the assessee-society to third parties (known as incoming members) in lieu


Mar 06 2006

Sterling Centre Premises Owners Co-op. Societies Ltd. Vs. Nanubhai R. ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-06-2006

Reported in: (2006)3GLR1853

Matched in: Parties Sterling Centre Premises Owners Co-op. Societies Ltd. Vs. Nanubhai R. Shah - Prop. of Dash Publicity and anr.


Oct 04 2011

Suku Premises Development Pvt Ltd and 1 - Petitioners Vs. State of Guj ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Oct-04-2011

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value =...


Apr 29 2014

Usha Sunder Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Nilang Desai and Ot ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-29-2014

No.3 is the previous Secretary. Defendant No.4 is the successor in interest of defendant Nos.1 and 2 under certain documents executed by and between defendant Nos.3 and 4. 3. The predecessors-in-title of defendant Nos.1 and 2 sought


Apr 05 1990

Apeejay Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., and Another Vs. Nishar Ahm ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-05-1990

Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR468; (1990)85CTR(Bom)46; [1990]185ITR487(Bom)

The building was sold to various persons on what is known as ownership basis by blocks and godowns. Certain portions were retained by the vendors for their own use or for letting out to tenants. All this


Mar 08 2001

Kiran Industrial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Janata Kamgar Union ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR494; 2001(4)BomCR550; (2001)3BOMLR180; [2001(89)FLR707]; (2001)ILLJ1499Bom; 2001(4)MhLj665

of R. A. Maskati (supra) a learned Single Judge of this Court has held that a trust owning certain properties to be a commercial establishment to attract the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act. The Trust had … has 200 members as the owners of the industrial units or Industrial galas. The society has several commercial premises wherein different kind of commercial or trading activities are carried on by the owners of the units. The


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial