Cereal - Judgment Search Results

Sunrise Cereals Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Namely Binod Kumar Sekhsa ...

Court: Jharkhand

(Shiv Shambhu Agrotech Private Vs. Union of India & Ors.) With Civil Review No. 18 of 2015 (Sunrise Cereals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.) With Civil Review No. 19 of 2015 (Shree Ganesh Rice

Sarada Cereals Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and anr ...

Court: Kolkata

Ashim Kumar Roy, J.1. A complaint being laid before the Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta by the opposite party No. 2 represented by its Director Ram Prakash Behani alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 185/403/406/420/477/120B...

Bagree Cereals (P.) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Hanuman Prasad Bagri and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2001]105CompCas465(Cal),(2001)2CompLJ397(Cal)

that if a debt remained owing to H. P. from the company being the present company, i.e., Bagri Cereals Pvt. Ltd. it would be unreasonable for H. P. to ask for a just and equitable winding up

The United Cereal Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1971CriLJ1605; ILR1971Delhi607; 1971RLR17

Matched in: Parties The United Cereal Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Postum Cereal Co. Vs. California Fig Nut Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co. - 272 U.S. 693 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Postum Cereal Co. v.

Hanuman Prasad Bagri and ors. Vs. Bagress Cereals Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1416; [2001]105CompCas493(SC); (2001)2CompLJ392(SC); JT2001(4)SC424; 2001(3)SCALE86; (2001)4SCC420; [2001]2SCR811; 2001(2)LC1134(SC)

Rajendra Babu, J.1. A petition under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] was filed before the Calcutta High Court on grounds of oppression and mismanagement. The learned...

The Commissioner, Trade Tax, U.P. Vs. National Cereal Product Etc. Etc ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC2773; JT2005(3)SC127; (2005)3SCC366; [2005]140STC69(SC)

granted in special leave petitions.2. The dispute in this case is whether germinated barley or malt is a cereal for the purposes of three notifications. Malted barley is barley which is soaked in water and upon germination,

Icici Bank Ltd vs.sun Cereal Services Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court: Delhi

Punit K. Bhalla, Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Mr. Kashish Narang & Mr. Darpan Bain, Advocates (M- 9810080772). versus SUN CEREAL SERVICES PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Puneet Bajaj, Advocate (M- 9811700978). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M.

Commissioner of Trade Tax Vs. National Cereal Products Limited

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1998]111STC241(All)

consider as to whether the malt having been obtained from barley can be treated as foodgrain including the cereals outside the provisions of Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act and falls under notifications dated May

Cit Vs. National Cereals Products

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2004]136TAXMAN445(Delhi)

ORDERThis appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against order, dated 16-5-2002, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in...