Cantonments Act 1924 Section 95 - Judgment Search Results

Bahadur Singh Etc. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi375

..... the cantonment act is a bar to the acquisition cantonment act 1924 section 110 that the purpose of acquisition of any land under section 110 of the cantonment act is ..... public purpose or for a company as the case may be 95 another submission in this respect was that the lt governor ..... mulji soneji v state of gujarat and others 1970 guj lr 95 22 and another division bench decision of the said high court .....

M.K. Papiah and Sons Vs. the Excise Commissioner and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC1007; (1975)1SCC492; [1975]3SCR607; [1975]35STC537(SC)

land or buildings were added to s 250 of the cantonments act 1924 after the amendment the appellant cantonment board applied whether section 5 of the east punjab general sales tax act 1948 which empowered the state government to fix sales tax buildings were added to s 250 of the cantonments act 1924 after the amendment the appellant cantonment board applied under the a board or a military estates officer thus under the section the power to recover money is exercisable by such of board hapur v raghuvendra kripal 1966 1 s c r 950 the validity of the u p municipalities act 1916 was

State of U.P. Vs. Smt. Ram Sri and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1976All121

1916 the united provinces town areas act 1914 or the cantonments act 1924 as the case may be had vested in 117 which had been vested in the state under the act shall be vested in the gaon sabha or any other united provinces town areas act 1914 or the cantonments act 1924 as the case may be had vested in the state our opinion the defendant is entitled to get them under section 9 of the act the suit of the plaintiff in

Mookken Devassy Ouseph and Sons Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1975]36STC501(Ker)

assessee is a registered dealer under the general sales tax act it is also an authorised wholesale dealer of foodgrains and

Rajanlal Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1976CriLJ516

convicted for the offence under section 7 16 of the act the standard for cow milk prescribed under the rules is it was held that non compliance with the provisions of section 10 7 of the amended act would not vitiate the

Drope Vs. Missouri

Court : US Supreme Court

not oppose the motion for a psychiatric examination apparently no action was taken on the motion and petitioner s case was has a mental disease or defect excluding fitness to proceed section 552 020 3 prescribes the contents of a report of

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M.K.C. Kutty

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR332

code and not by the provisions of the specific relief act it is equally well settled that court has inherent powers settled that court has inherent powers to grant injunction under section 151 of the code of civil procedure even if a

The State of U.P. Vs. Raj NaraIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC865; (1975)4SCC428; [1975]3SCR333

the law behind sections 123 and 162 of the evidence act is the same as in english law it is that shall be decided by the court the second limb of section 162 says that the court if it sees fit may

Jugtambalal J. Gandhi Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1976)17GLR335

writing to a magistrate with a view to his taking action under this code that some person whether known or unknown cannot govern the applications for maintenance made under section 125 section 126 of the code states about the procedure in maintenance

M.V. Kuppuswami Vs. the Taluk Supply Officer, Sriperumbudur and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1975Mad395

licensing order read with section 3 of the essential commodities act 1955 the first respondent has also taken an objection to to be contravened after following the procedure set out in sections 102 and 103 crl p c which stand attracted to