Cantonments Act 1924 Section 95 - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Haannurammabai Kalal (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ528; 2008(1)AIRKarR178; 2008AIHC1220(Kar); 2008AIHC1220(Kar)

that the appellant ought to have sought remedy under the cantonments act itself as there was a bar in approaching the 11 sub section 4 of section 273 of the cantonments act 1924 reads as under nothing in sub section 1 shall issued under sections 185 and 256 of the cantonments act 1924 as null and void was dismissed by the trial court 1924 all of a sudden the appellant received notice under section 256 of the cantonments act 1924 as per ex p

Airports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

..... a period of eight weeks or adjusted against any future assessment in accordance with law cantonments act 1924 sections 68 1 nbsp revision of assessment list nbsp 1 the challenge by the petitioner airports ..... and mezzanine floor was purchased from the dcb for a sum of rs 4 61 95 600 this comprised capital cost of the original terminal i building at rs 2 86 .....

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Mukesh Prasad and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : II(2002)ACC184; 2002(50)BLJR169

notice as is now clearly evident section 60 of the cantonments act being dependent on these provisions and these provisions not vehicles in madhya pradesh section 3 1 of the said act entitled the taxation authority to levy tax on motor vehicles from the facts already narrated are that the cantonment act 1924 is the earliest in point of time which empowered thecantonment learned single judge did not take notice of section 82 section 137 or the first schedule to 1922 act may be

Cantonment Board, Delhi Vs. Mangey Ram

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi77; 1986(11)DRJ97

sanction of building plans by virtue of the provisions of cantonment act 1924 include within its ambit power exercisable in a is specifically contained in section 185 2 of the said act it provides that a board shall by notice in writing building plans by virtue of the provisions of cantonment act 1924 include within its ambit power exercisable in a like manner was held there are good reasons why an order under section 336 granting or refusing to sanction should be subject to

Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Defence Secretary and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

this action of co provisions of section 113 of the cantonments act 1924 were violated and it was prejudicial to the period 16th september 2003 to 30th november 2003 by this act shri ajay kumar chaudhary failed to act in accordance with act in accordance with section 113 of the cantonment act 1924 and acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of shri ajay kumar chaudhary failed to act in accordance with section 113 of the cantonment act 1924 and acted in a

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

..... made absolute accordingly no order as to costs 18 petition succeed cantonment act 1924 section 71 expression at any time power to amend assessment list power ..... in accordance with the provisions contained in chapter v of the cantonment act 1924 act for short it appears that after 1st april 1980 the respondents ..... rs 22 78 771 on 1st february 1981 to rs 22 95 253 on 1st april 1981 to rs 23 50 791 on .....

J. Pratap Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT526; 2006(86)DRJ251

the ratio of the case has no application to the cantonments act 32 it is well settled that a decision should board but only varied boards under section 14 of the act the term of the varied board admittedly expired on 2 the act should be concluded before this period cantonments act 1924sections 13 amp 14 appointment of civilian member to the board 2 2003 the central government constituted a varied board under section 14 1 of the act 6 since the aforesaid board

Gajraj Singh Son of Sri Attar Singh and Meerut-rohata-barnava-binauli- ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2915

required under section 61 read with section 255 of the cantonments act 1924 2 of 1924 inviting objections and suggestions from submits that the language of section 60 of the cantonment act shows that the reference to the power of municipalities in arguments are quoted herein under for convenience the cantonment act 1924 section 60 general power of taxation 1 the board may another without incorporation then unless a different intention clearly appears section 55 provides for an appeal to this court on one

Mrs. Tara Malik Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979MP188; 1979MPLJ555

and that as cantonment boards are independently authorised under the cantonments act to impose a similar tax it cannot be held that as cantonment boards are independently authorised under the cantonments act to impose a similar tax it cannot be held that to a cantonment board section 60 of the cantonments act 1924 which deals with imposition of taxes authorises a cantonment board been constituted under the law relating to local authority concerned section 2 f defines owner in respect of any land or

Venkataramana Rice and General Merchants, Gudivada, Krishna District V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD449; 1998(6)ALT74

area and place declared to be a cantonment under the cantonments act 1924 section 3 envisages constitution of a p rural superfluous 35 for all the above reasons both the impugned act as well as demand notices issued pursuant to the impugned place declared to be a cantonment under the cantonments act 1924 section 3 envisages constitution of a p rural development board and 15 of the central sales tax act according to section 14 paddy is declared to be goods of special importanceand