Cantonments Act 1924 Section 95 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: cantonments act 1924 section 95 Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 536 results (0.405 seconds)The Public Prosecutor Vs. M. Rangareddy and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-18-1956
Reported in : 1957CriLJ623
nor is there any other board or body under the cantonments act discharging any such duties the duties of the cantonment as follows the madras prohibition act is a self contained act prescribing its own procedure and only by virtue of certain p c applicable to investigations under the madras prohibition act section 162 cri p c cannot therefore be invoked as a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Awtar Krishna
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-17-1956
Reported in : AIR1957All88; 1957CriLJ167; [1957]8STC244(All)
nor is there any other board or body under the cantonments act discharging any such duties the duties of the cantonment offence punishable under section 14 b u p sales tax act 3 learned counsel for the respondent referred us to a in each case cantonments act c a no 41 2006 section 346 cantonment fund servants rules 1937 rules 13 14 15
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTelu Ram JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-05-1956
Reported in : AIR1956P& H147
full supervisory control under section 52 1 b of the cantonments act 7 this being so this petition falls and is an appeal arising out of a proceeding under a special act sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 board under section 20 3 cantonments act act 2 of 1924 in that meeting all the seven elected members and six nature of the decision of the board 4 under this section it is open to the authority concerned to suspend the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNandram Agarwalla Vs. State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-28-1956
Reported in : AIR1957Cal222,1957CriLJ442
the 9 12 1946 and 30 12 1946 returns were actually filed on behalf of srirarn jhabarmull the returns exts 3 under section 120b 379 i p c and charges under section 465 and 466 i p c that the petitioner had
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindusthan Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Laxmi Narayan Saha and anr.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-19-1956
Reported in : AIR1957Cal72,61CWN118
sue being invalid under section 6 e transfer of property act lakshmi narayan saha is not entitled to that part of transferors in my opinion the respondent company arc entitled under section 146 to make the application for execution which the original
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSambanda Naicker and ors. Vs. Ranganayaki Ammal and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-27-1956
Reported in : AIR1957Mad207
to bring a fresh suit on the same cause of action but this old section was amended later on and it suit on the same cause of action but this old section was amended later on and it took the form in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Chandra and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-26-1956
Reported in : AIR1957SC381; 1957CriLJ559
but in a case like this where the two accused acted in concert by virtue of a common intention and of maintain the convictions and sentences against both the appellants under sections 364 and 386 penal code taken with sections 120b b
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Shaik Server
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-02-1956
Reported in : 1957CriLJ1393
applied the presumption under section 114 a of the evidence act and convicted the petitioner under section 411 i p c to cast a reasonable doubt as to his guilt under section 411 i p c 6 the conviction and sentence of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohanlal Keshavlal Vs. the State
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-25-1956
Reported in : AIR1956Bom504; 1956CriLJ879
prosecute him as required by section 6 prevention of corruption act rule 1704 of the discipline and appeal rules under the again indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 295a f
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahalinga Shetty Vs. Jalaja Shedthi and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-15-1956
Reported in : (1956)2MLJ446
clear that unless there is a specific exception in the act in every place where the word kavaru occurs the meaning 10 mr ramayya nayak then referred to clause 3 of section 36 which is as follows if at the time of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT