Cable Operator - Year 2016 - Judgments

Jan 06 2016 (HC)

Saisiva @ Sivasubramanian Vs. The District Collector, Theni District a ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Jan-06-2016

..... 10 have been or are being contravened by any cable operator he may seize the equipment being used by such cable operator for operating the cable television network provided that the seizure of equipment in ..... section 4 a in cases where the central government had issued a notification mandating every cable operator to transmit programmes in an encrypted form through a digital addressable system iii a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 2016 (HC)

Saisiva @ Sivasubramanian and Another Vs. The District Collector, Then ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Jan-05-2016

..... as follows sir reference your application dated 9 10 2014 renewal for registration as a cable operator the necessary registration cannot be granted to you for the following reason s i application ..... and fulfilled the prescribed eligibility criteria and conditions 21 the procedure for registration as a cable operator is prescribed in section 4 22 since section 4 2 does not indicate the eligibility .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2016 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.param Hans City Cable Network

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-26-2016

..... that the defendant has about seventy thousand connections and the license fee for cable operator is rs 18 per month per household and therefore the damages are conservatively ..... defendant is a ground cable operator carrying on its business of providing cable television services under the name param hans city cable network to various subscribers having operation throughout india including the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.gurgaon Cable Tv Series

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-18-2016

..... in the state of haryana having approximately seven lakhs connections the defendant like any other cable operator provides cable advertising and non stop entertainment and make extensive use of hindi songs film extracts ..... rate card of the plaintiff on its website which specifically states the license fee for cable operator license is rs 18 rupees eighteen per connection per house hold per month plus .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.fun Cable Network

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-18-2016

..... card of the plaintiff on its website which specifically states the license fee for cable operator license is rs 18 rupees eighteen per connection per house hold per month ..... the plaintiff that the defendant fun cable network located in gurgaon haryana is a ground cable operator providing cable television services to various subscribes having operation throughout india including districts of haryana .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2016 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.haridwar Cables Network

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-26-2016

..... has submitted that the defendant has about seventy thousand connections and the license fee for cable operator is rs 18 per month per household and therefore the damages are conservatively calculated at ..... is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant is a ground cable operator carrying on its business of providing cable television services under the logo hcn movie express to various subscribers .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2016 (HC)

Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.sbn Network

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-26-2016

..... has submitted that the defendant has about seventy thousand connections and the license fee for cable operator is rs 18 per month per household and therefore the damages are conservatively calculated at ..... it is the case of the plaintiff that defendant is a ground cable operator carrying on its business of providing cable television services under the logo sbn today and sbn entertainment to various .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2016 (HC)

N. Pandiarajan Vs. Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Rep. ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Jun-09-2016

..... was allowed on 03 05 2014 in the meanwhile the first respondent appointed a taluk cable operator in uthamapalayam taluk and granting signals through him on and from 01 09 2015 and ..... office bodinayakkanur 4 it comes to be known that some of the local cable tv operators viz haridoss cable tv maruthi cable vision and the 5th respondent herein propagated and advertised that they would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2016 (HC)

Yogesh Cable Networks vs.ministry of Information & Broadcasting & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-03-2016

..... in public interest notified that it shall be obligatory for every cable operator to transmit or re transmit programmes of any channel in ..... are readily available in the open market and even through the cable operators and vendors he further contends that originally digital set top ..... five years have elapsed from the said date when the cable operators were made aware that they have to changeover to das .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 2016 (HC)

M/S Kollam Internet Cable Distribution Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & O ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2016

..... in public interest notified that it shall be obligatory for every cable operator to transmit or re transmit programmes of any channel in ..... are readily available in the open market and even through the cable operators and vendors he further contends that originally digital set top ..... five years have elapsed from the said date when the cable operators were made aware that they have to changeover to das .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results