Skip to content


Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: cable operator Page 1 of about 1,037 results (0.123 seconds)
Mar 05 2013 (HC)

M/S.Cable Operators Guild of Madurai, Vs. 1.The Managing Director,

Court: Chennai

..... also mention their bank account details in their login page of the tactv webside the cable operator can view their individual subscriber payment details any time just by login to the tactv ..... website thereby the cable operator can ascertain their defaulters at any time easily quot 5 the first respondent very specifically .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 2013 (TRI)

Chekuri Chaitanya Krishna Chowdary Vs. Narendra Varma, Local Cable Ope ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the office of the opposite party no 1 the local cable operator on the same day the persons from the office of ..... opposite party no 2 manager operations siti cable head office whereunder the complainant was informed to approach local cable operator who has given connection ..... of standards of quality of service broad casting and cable services cable television non cas areas regulations 2009 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 09 1995 (HC)

M/s. Nagpur Cable Operators' Association Vs. Commissioner of Police, N ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1996Bom180; 1995(2)MhLj753

..... to cause any obstruction and or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and ..... to cause any obstruction and or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 1994 (FN)

Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... television programs and sell or license them to cable operators in some cases cable operators have acquired ownership of cable programmers and vice versa although cable operators may create some of their own pro 629 ..... actual effects of 668 must carry on the speech of cable operators and cable programmers i e the extent to which cable operators will in fact be forced to make changes in their .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 1984 (FN)

Capital Cities Cable, Inc. Vs. Crisp

Court: US Supreme Court

..... transmit only one signal and receive notification from their networks concerning advertisements cable operators simultaneously receive and channel to their subscribers a variety of signals from ..... had determined that the retransmission of distant broadcast signals by cable systems did not subject cable operators to copyright infringement liability because such retransmissions were not performances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2009 (TRI)

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... it was a short order and prescribed that the charges payable by the cable subscribers to cable operator cable operators to msos broadcasters and msos to broadcasters prevalent as on 26 12 ..... principal tariff order wherein it stipulated that the tariff at various levels namely cable subscriber to cable operator cable operators to msos broadcasters and msos to broadcasters prevalent as on 26 12 2003 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 2010 (HC)

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court: Uttaranchal

..... the act from the definition of communication network given in the agreement between the cable operator and sub cable operator termed as franchisee in the agreement it will be clear that the service ..... any programme which transmitted or given to a large number of sub cable operators although they call them as cable operator the viewers enjoy or are entertained by such performance film or programme .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 1997 (FN)

Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... theory has been advanced as the substantial interest supporting a first amendment burden on cable operators and cable programmers in finding that must carry serves a substantial interest the principal opinion ..... ignores the fact that there are two groups of appellants challenging the judgment below cable operators and cable programmers and that the issue is of more interest to the former than .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1996 (FN)

Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... similar purposes the provisions as augmented by fcc regulations permit cable system operators to prohibit programming that the cable operator reasonably believes describes or depicts sexual or excretory activities or ..... of the federal government they owe their existence to contracts forged between cable operators and local cable franchising authorities ante at 734 760 762 opinion of breyer j post .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1991 (FN)

Leathers Vs. Medlock

Court: US Supreme Court

..... receipts act to impose the tax on cable television petitioners in no 90 38 a cable television subscriber a cable operator and a cable trade organization cable petitioners brought this class action in the ..... by arkansas newspapers magazines television broadcasters and radio stations this court has recognized that cable operators exercise the same core press function of communication of ideas as do the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //