Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 05 2013

M/S.Cable Operators Guild of Madurai, Vs. 1.The Managing Director,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-05-2013

enter the website www.arasucable.com The subscriber should know either their area LCO number or the name of the cable operator/company. The subscriber is given additional facility to identify their operator by entering their area pincode. The subscriber should … be reconciled by the Bank and will be sent to TACTC Corporation. The TACTV Corpn. will remit the Cable operator's share of Rs.50/- in the Cable Operators Bank account on 10th every month. The Bank account of the


Aug 09 1995

M/s. Nagpur Cable Operators' Association Vs. Commissioner of Police, N ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-09-1995

Reported in: AIR1996Bom180; 1995(2)MhLj753

to take any steps to cause any obstruction and/or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and TV set … to take any steps to cause any interference or obstruction to the members of the petitioner-Association and like operators to carry out their lawful business of receiving signals through the satellite channels and in turn render their


Aug 20 2013

Chekuri Chaitanya Krishna Chowdary Vs. Narendra Varma, Local Cable Ope ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Aug-20-2013

taken a new Siti Cable connection on 13.8.2012 from the office of the opposite party no.1, the local cable operator. On the same day, the persons from the office of opposite party no.1 came to his house and … reply, from opposite party no.2, Manager(Operations), Siti Cable (Head Office) whereunder, the complainant was informed to approach local cable operator, who has given connection and visit their office and complain for not issuing receipts. On 18.9.2012, at about


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial