Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results

Cable Operators Welfare Association vs Sameer Manchanda

Court: Kerala

JANUARY 2019 / 4TH MAGHA, 1940 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 6681/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: CABLE OPERATORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION JAIHIND BUILDING, KUMBALAPALLY ROAD,CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALA P.O.,ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT NAVEEN.V.D. BY ADVS. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM … 2019 / 4TH MAGHA, 1940 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 6681/2018 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: CABLE OPERATORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION JAIHIND BUILDING, KUMBALAPALLY ROAD,CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALA P.O.,ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT NAVEEN.V.D. BY ADVS. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM SRI.JOSEPH

Cable Operators Welfare Association vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

Services Inter Connection(Addressable Systems)Regulations, 2017, providing for 'revenue sharing' between the Multi System Operator (MSO in short)and Local Cable Operator (LCO in short) and fixing a default revenue sharing ratio of “55:45” in the case of pay channels,

M/S.Cable Operators Guild of Madurai, Vs. 1.The Managing Director,

Court: Chennai

enter the website www.arasucable.com The subscriber should know either their area LCO number or the name of the cable operator/company. The subscriber is given additional facility to identify their operator by entering their area pincode. The subscriber should … be reconciled by the Bank and will be sent to TACTC Corporation. The TACTV Corpn. will remit the Cable operator's share of Rs.50/- in the Cable Operators Bank account on 10th every month. The Bank account of the

M/s. Nagpur Cable Operators' Association Vs. Commissioner of Police, N ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1996Bom180; 1995(2)MhLj753

to take any steps to cause any obstruction and/or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and TV set … to take any steps to cause any interference or obstruction to the members of the petitioner-Association and like operators to carry out their lawful business of receiving signals through the satellite channels and in turn render their

Chekuri Chaitanya Krishna Chowdary Vs. Narendra Varma, Local Cable Ope ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

taken a new Siti Cable connection on 13.8.2012 from the office of the opposite party no.1, the local cable operator. On the same day, the persons from the office of opposite party no.1 came to his house and … reply, from opposite party no.2, Manager(Operations), Siti Cable (Head Office) whereunder, the complainant was informed to approach local cable operator, who has given connection and visit their office and complain for not issuing receipts. On 18.9.2012, at about