Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results
M/S.Cable Operators Guild of Madurai, Vs. 1.The Managing Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
enter the website www.arasucable.com The subscriber should know either their area LCO number or the name of the cable operator/company. The subscriber is given additional facility to identify their operator by entering their area pincode. The subscriber should … be reconciled by the Bank and will be sent to TACTC Corporation. The TACTV Corpn. will remit the Cable operator's share of Rs.50/- in the Cable Operators Bank account on 10th every month. The Bank account of the
M/s. Nagpur Cable Operators' Association Vs. Commissioner of Police, N ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-09-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Bom180; 1995(2)MhLj753
to take any steps to cause any obstruction and/or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and TV set … to take any steps to cause any interference or obstruction to the members of the petitioner-Association and like operators to carry out their lawful business of receiving signals through the satellite channels and in turn render their
Chekuri Chaitanya Krishna Chowdary Vs. Narendra Varma, Local Cable Ope ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
taken a new Siti Cable connection on 13.8.2012 from the office of the opposite party no.1, the local cable operator. On the same day, the persons from the office of opposite party no.1 came to his house and … reply, from opposite party no.2, Manager(Operations), Siti Cable (Head Office) whereunder, the complainant was informed to approach local cable operator, who has given connection and visit their office and complain for not issuing receipts. On 18.9.2012, at about
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free