Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results

Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... theory has been advanced as the substantial interest supporting a first amendment burden on cable operators and cable programmers in finding that must carry serves a substantial interest the principal opinion ..... ignores the fact that there are two groups of appellants challenging the judgment below cable operators and cable programmers and that the issue is of more interest to the former than .....

M/S. Video Master and Another Vs. M/S. Nishi Productions and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(1)ALLMR620; 1998(3)BomCR782

..... fee or charge thus instead of individual viewers having their own separate dish antennae the cable operators have common dish antennae and other equipment for deploying the signals by means of wire ..... the plaintiffs it appears that the plaintiffs are issuing a form of certificate to various cable operators this certificate is in effect a licence in our view the defendants can only avail .....

Aasia Industrial Technologies Ltd. and ors. Vs. Ambience Space Sellers ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)99BOMLR613

..... fee or charge thus instead of individual viewers having their own separate dish antenna the cable operators have common dish antenna and other equipment for deploying the signals by means of wire ..... plaintiffs a party may view or further communicate the programmes only on these conditions all cable operators including the defendants are bound by these conditions and to comply with the same the .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(7)SC275; (1998)9SCC93

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....

Hindustan Machines Tools Ltd. and anr. Vs. M.S. Kang/P.N. Kashyap

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1997(2)SC393; (1997)ILLJ911SC; (1997)11SCC186; [1997]1SCR569

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....

Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. Devi Shankar Kumar Shukla

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(9)SC359; (2000)ILLJ531SC; (1997)11SCC193

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....

Vishal Singh and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1997(2)ALD(Cri)864; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)62; 1998CriLJ505; JT1997(8)SC570; 1997(6)SCALE566; (1998)9SCC90

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....

Nylon Net Manufacturing Company Vs. Addl. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(7)SC231; 1997(2)KLT520(SC); (1998)9SCC98

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....

Choksi Tube Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998(97)ELT404(SC); (1997)11SCC179

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....

Harishankar and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(9)SC289; (1997)11SCC191

..... re transmitted by that agent cum distributor to other msos cable operators this would result in subscriber base of other cable t v operators shifting over to agent cum distributor this would be discriminatory ..... for in the sense that the signals of the broadcaster shall go through the cable network owned and operated by such an agent cum distributor the object of the interconnection regulation is .....