Skip to content


Cable Operator - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: cable operator Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 109 results (0.144 seconds)
Aug 09 1995 (HC)

M/s. Nagpur Cable Operators' Association Vs. Commissioner of Police, N ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-09-1995

Reported in: AIR1996Bom180; 1995(2)MhLj753

..... to cause any obstruction and or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and ..... to cause any obstruction and or interference in carrying out their regular business as lawful cable operators by receiving signals from satellite and in turn render services to its various members and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 1995 (SC)

Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-09-1995

Reported in: AIR1995SC1236; JT1995(2)SC110; 1995(1)SCALE539; (1995)2SCC161; [1995]1SCR1036

..... all the viewers who have t v screens sets in the second case viz cable telecasting the cable operator receives the signals from the satellite by means of the parabolic dish antenna and ..... any frequency or channel owned or controlled by the national government or governmental agencies the cable operator can show any event occurring in any part of the country or the world live .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 1995 (FN)

Hurley Vs. Irish-american Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, I ...

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-19-1995

..... by others turner broadcasting system inc v fcc 512 u s 622 636 1994 cable programmers and cable operators engage in and transmit speech and they are entitled to the protection of the ..... require a speaker to generate as an original matter each item featured in the communication cable operators for example are engaged in protected speech activities even when they only select programming originally .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 1995 (HC)

Hindalco Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Oth ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-15-1995

Reported in: AIR1996All199

..... in which entertainment is held notax can be levied t v cable operators neither provides any place nor charge any money for granting ..... nor seeks admission or entrance to any place provided by the operator but he views the programme on his own television in ..... from its employees towards the maintenance charges of the aforesaid cable television net work though the actual expenditure incurred by hindalco .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1995 (HC)

Kashi Nath Tapuriah Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Dec-22-1995

..... company had formed a co operative society since long time which is known as cable company co operative society and is registered under ..... short in connivance with tulsi prasad vice chairman of the cable cooperative society ltd society in short misappropriated a sum of ..... shares subsequently this was transferred to the british insulated calendars cables plc known as bicc part of its equity shares were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 1995 (TRI)

Baker Mercer (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-1995

Reported in: (1995)(78)ELT336TriDel

..... their customers these consisted of cable bracket and adopter it appears that these three are essential for the operation of the meter but they ..... that these cables are bought out items and are dealt with by the appellants only as part of their trading operations and not ..... stations and talkie talkies manufactured by the appellants the value of cable which is not an integral part of the sets but is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 1995 (TRI)

Oriental Building and Furnishing Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-22-1995

Reported in: (1995)53ITD198(Delhi)

..... equipments furniture fixture and fittings etc 2 m s cjhpl shall run operate a first class restaurant in the said premises 3 in consideration of ..... the decision of the delhi high court in cit v super fine cables p ltd 1985 154 itr 532 and the calcutta high court in ..... which is the jurisdictional high court in the case of super fine cables p ltd supra in the said case the assessee company which had .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1995 (TRI)

National Radio and Electronics Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-31-1995

Reported in: (1995)(76)ELT436TriDel

..... customer including conducting groufing cabling setting out the layout fixing and erecting and as a result of these operations the ups comes into ..... it was held that in the present case the ups becomes operative only on installation on the ground and therefore it became ..... items is includible even if they are not essential for the operation of manufactured goods provided they are fitted or attached to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 1995 (TRI)

T.T.G. Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-18-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT517TriDel

..... mechanical electrical hydraulic and pheumatic systems including interconnecting pipe lines and cables alongwith commissiong spares and operating spares as per list enclosed in the schedule to the enquiry ..... in hydraulics we moved away from conventional electro mechanical to fully hydraulic operation with simple cylinder operated movements the growing number of world wide sold machines and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 12 1995 (HC)

Alkapuri Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D. S. Khoba and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-12-1995

Reported in: (1996)134CTR(Guj)483

..... this explanation cannot have retrospective operation in other decision in the case of cit vs oriental power cables ltd 1992 105 ctr raj ..... inserted w e f 1st june 1987 and not retrospective in operation to interpret the original provisions sans and the explanation 9 ..... the unamended provisions of s 194a this explanation was prospective in operation it did not therefore apply to the present case same .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //