Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bengal bihar and orissa and assam laws act 1912 section 4 repealed Page 3 of about 154 results (0.139 seconds)

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2001Cal213,(2001)2CALLT445(HC)

..... , creeks, harbours, and places overflown, within the ebbing and flowing of the sea, and high-water mark, within, about, and throughout the said three provinces, countries of districts, of bengal, bihar and orissa and all the said territories or islands adjacent there unto and dependent thereupon, the cognizance whereof both belong to the jurisdiction of the admiralty, as the same is used and ..... pleasure, and we do hereby grant ordain, establish, and appoint that the said supreme court of judicature at fort william in bengal, shall be a court of admiralty, in and for the said provinces, countries, or districts, of bengal, behar and orissa, and all other territories and islands adjacent there unto, and which now are, or ought to be, dependent thereupon and we .....

Jaswinder Singh and Another Vs. Mrigendra Pritam Vikramsingh Steiner a ...

Court : Delhi

..... for further acquisition, it was empowered to raise an army, make war and peace and exercise governmental functions. it subsequently obtained the grant of diwani of bengal, bihar and orissa from the emperor shah alam in 1765. the british crown, however, did not all at once and directly assume the sovereign powers, but as between the ..... by them unless by consent of the parties. rise of chartered and non-chartered high courts: 14. on the east india company securing the dewani of bengal, bihar and orissa in 1765, it set up courts of civil and criminal jurisdiction for the mofussil. the moffusil dewani adalat was established for administration of civil justice, with ..... presidency towns. pursuant to this act, king george iii issued a charter establishing a court of record called the supreme court of judicature at fort william in bengaldated 26th march, 1774. the clauses of the charter show that the jurisdiction of the supreme court extended throughout the presidency towns. the supreme court was, .....

Madras Steam Navigation Co. Ld. Vs. Shalimar Works, Ld.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1915Cal681,(1915)ILR42Cal85,28Ind.Cas.463

..... , creeks harbours and places overflown within the ebbing and flowing of the sea and high water mark, within, about and throughout the said three provinces, countries or districts of bengal, bihar and orissa and ail the said territories or islands adjacent thereunto and dependent thereupon, the cognizance whereof doth belong to the jurisdiction of the admiralty, as the same is used and exercised ..... and pleasure, and we do hereby grant, ordain, establish and appoint that the said supreme court of judicature at fort william in bengal, shall be court of admiralty, in and for the said provinces, countries or districts, of bengal, bihar and orissa and all other territories and islands adjacent thereunto, and which now are or ought to be dependent thereupon; and we do hereby .....

In the Matter of Lovejoy Patell and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1944Cal433

..... jurisdiction, powers and authorities to be thereby established should and might ex tend to all british subjects who shall reside in the kingdom or the provinces of bengal, bihar and orissa or any of them. panck-ridge j. was of opinion that section 14, regulating act, 1773, had the effect of confining the jurisdiction conferred on ..... 16, letters patent of 1862, by conferring on this court power and authority with respect to the persons and estates of infants, idiots and lunatics within the bengal division of the presidency of fort-william conferred upon the high court a jurisdiction more extensive, in the territorial sense, than that which the supreme court had ..... regard to ordinary original civil jurisdiction. this jurisdiction over infants is operative and is to be exercised on the person and estate of all infants within the bengal division of the presidency. the power and authority, however, are the same as those which were vested in the high court immediately before the publication of .....

Kommuru Krishnamurthy Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961AP283

..... law of england was introduced into india.in 1765 lord clive persuaded king shah alam to grant to the company at calcutta firman for the collection of revenues of bengal, bihar and orissa. this further facilitated the establishment of courts. to administer civil and criminal justice. the privy, council observed in mayor of lyons v. east india co., (1836 ..... a trading company decided to assume to themselves the sovereign powers that had been conceded by the moghul rulers of india and they established supreme courts at madras, bengal and bombay between 1774 and 1823 empowering thereto decide suits against all inhabitants of their areas, then came the charter act in 1833 as a result of ..... why an action lies against the crown with reference to acts of this type is as also observed by chakravarti, j. in uday chand v. province of bengal, 51 cal wn 537, because such actions in fact could lawfully be brought against the east india company at the relevant time and also because a specific provision .....

Jayaswal Shipping Company Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in Ste ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1954Cal415,58CWN468

..... the charter of 1774 defines the admiralty jurisdiction of the supreme court. it made the supreme court of judicature, at port william in bengal, the court of admiralty, in and for the provinces, countries or districts, of bengal, behar and orissa, and all other territories and islands adjacent thereunto. it gave power to the supreme court to hear, examine, try and determine and ..... of this high court in calcutta is the same as the admiralty jurisdiction in the high court in england. mr. justice panckridge took the same view on this point in -- 'bengal assam steamship co., ltd. v. shankar maru' : air1937cal122 .14. the crux of the problem of interpretation presented in this case before me arises, however, on the language of proviso (a .....

Jai Rajendra Impex Private Ltd. Vs. M/S. Shambhu Nath and Brothers and ...

Court : Kolkata

..... marketing of electrical fans of all kinds under the trademark toofan since 1987. the said goods manufactured by the plaintiff were distributed and sold extensively through the states of west bengal, bihar, jharkhand, orissa, assam, gujarat, tamil nadu, uttar pradesh, madhya pradesh, andhra pradesh and many other states through an established network of dealers and distributors. b) the trademark toofan is represented in .....

Sunith Kumar Mallik and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... the petitioners are the resident of different mohalla in the town of hazaribagh.. it is stated that in the year 1765.00, the british government took over the diwani of bengal, bihar and orissa. the area of the hazaribagh district was bifurcated into three estates namely ramgarh kendi and kharagdiha and one thanadari jagir of kunda on which no revenue was assessed. it .....

Sundararajulu Naidu and ors. Vs. B. Papiah Naidu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1938Mad623; (1938)1MLJ686

..... .), a grant of a similar description came up again for consideration before the privy council. the grantee in that case was the eldest son of the nawab nazim of bengal, bihar and orissa. he agreed to relinquish this title with its appurtenant rights in consideration of his receiving the titles of nawab bahadur of murshidabad and amir-ul-omrah and also in consideration .....

Nrisingha Charan Nandy Choudhry Vs. Rajniti Prasad Singh

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1936)38BOMLR768

..... jurisdiction has again been debated by the learned counsel for the parties.2. the sonthal parganas, which originally formed part of the presidency of bengal and are now included in the province of bihar and orissa, were considered to be a backward tract; and it was, therefore, deemed expedient that that territory should be governed, not by the ..... the sonthal parganas act, xxxvii of 1855, which removed the district of the sonthal parganas from the operation of the general laws and regulations governing the presidency of bengal, specified only certain laws which were extended to that district, and that section 17 or its predecessor is not to be found in that list. it is ..... court established outside that district. the intention of the legislature must be gathered from the language used by it, and the expression ' a civil court established under the bengal, agra and assam civil courts act, 1887 ' is wide enough to include a civil court established in the district of gaya. the court, in which the .....